Hello,
I have a small semantic problem that I can't make up my mind about.
Basically, I have a list like this: Something: blah blah; blah; blah.
The Something: is a different font size, and kind of a header for the
list. I can't decide if I should just do a paragraph with Something
strong or
The Something: is a different font size, and kind of a header for the
list.
It seems you answered your own question
something should be a header (h.x tag)
look at the footer on sites like linkedin.com - very common approach
Neal
Hello,
I have a small semantic problem that I can't make up
Hi Christian
Whether or not the 'Something' should be a heading depends on the content
and function of the list. Quite often, the text preceding a list is a
lead-in sentence e.g.
While on leave I will:
- make curtains
- get daughter organised for school
- relax (hah!).
I would mark the lead-in
Christian Snodgrass wrote:
I have a small semantic problem that I can't make up my mind about.
Basically, I have a list like this: Something: blah blah; blah;
blah. The Something: is a different font size, and kind of a header
for the list. I can't decide if I should just do a paragraph with
Mordechai Peller wrote:
Christian Snodgrass wrote:
I have a small semantic problem that I can't make up my mind about.
Basically, I have a list like this: Something: blah blah; blah;
blah. The Something: is a different font size, and kind of a
header for the list. I can't decide if I should
crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too:
http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible (the Zeldman
lemur cracked me up completely)
On the issue... it's something MS simply won't back down on no matter what
any of us
code for standards compliant browsers and let ie fall where it may.
dwain
On 1/24/08, Ben Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too:
http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible
It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too:
http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible (the Zeldman
lemur cracked me up completely)
That's awesome!
We can opt to save our energy for standards-based browsers and not
bother learning new versions of IE.
From: Ben Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
On the issue... it's something MS simply won't back down on no matter what
any of us think. So we may as well figure out how to deal with it.
Discuss? :) Surely this list has some opinions...
It's all about numbers.
Ben Buchanan wrote:
Implementation specifics aside (yes I still think it's spam), the
version target feature offers us a chance to lock our sites to the
most convenient version of IE. MS has invited us to ignore their
newer products. We can opt to save our energy for standards-based
browsers
Hi,
Whats my cheapest option for getting ie7 to run on my intel based mac.
Is it basically an option between boot camp, parallels or virtual pc?
Very frustrated with discrepancies at the moment.
-best
kevin
***
List Guidelines:
On Jan 25, 2008 6:08 AM, kevin mcmonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats my cheapest option for getting ie7 to run on my intel based mac.
Is it basically an option between boot camp, parallels or virtual pc?
Very frustrated with discrepancies at the moment.
Yes - Parallels, VMWare Fusion, or
12 matches
Mail list logo
