Hi Ben
In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various
anti-discrimination legislation, including the Disability Discrimination
Act. (It comes under the banner of 'equal opportunities' rather than 'human
rights'.) One form of discrimination is offering a service to one group and
Hi Elizabeth,
Thanks for your clarification as that brings it back into perspectiveI
think I read too much into Andrews reply;-)
I am all about equal opportunity and would not dream of intentionally
excluding anyone especially when it is so easy to include as many as
possible.
Cheers,
On Oct 25, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote:
Hi Ben
In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various anti-
discrimination legislation, including the Disability Discrimination
Act. (It comes under the banner of ‘equal opportunities’ rather than
‘human rights’.) One
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 18:49, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 25, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote:
In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various
anti-discrimination legislation, including the Disability Discrimination
Act. [...]
One form of discrimination is
Brett Patterson wrote:
On a different
note, I have a problem with the JavaScript code I am writing.
If you're going to begin a new topic, you should always begin a new
thread to avoid confusing the old thread with irrelevant material and to
attract potential readers who are disinterested in
Elizabeth,
sorry to be a pedant on a Monday morning (erk!) - HREOC is now AHRC - the
URL is the same though.
Cheers, Andrew
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ben
In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various
Michael wrote:
If you were to be prosecuted the court (or more likely
HREOC/Administrative Appeals Tribunal before it got to court) would
consider what measures could be taken without imposing undue hardship
upon the service provider to ensure that equitable access is available
to people
I will be out of the office starting 27/10/2008 and will not return until
28/10/2008.
Keep track of your Medicare Claims History online . Register for Online
Services today .
NOTICE - This message is intended
Indeed, as Alan Kay inventor of Smalltalk and OOP said
I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have
C++ in mind.
cheers
L
liorean wrote:
2008/10/24 James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based. It can
be
Luke,
Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question "Is _javascript_
object-orientated?". With that, and in closing, I would like to point
out that my comments were based on the actual question - asking if
_javascript_ were object-oriented, not if it has objects.
Prototype has objects,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke,
Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question Is JavaScript
object-orientated?. With that, and in closing, I would like to point out
that my comments were based on the actual question - asking if
Breton,
There is a difference between the use of object and object-oriented
programming. Coad / Yourdon suggests object-oriented being classes and
objects, inheritance and communication with messages. Does _javascript_
have classes? Can inheritance of _javascript_ occur without prototype?
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Breton,
There is a difference between the use of object and object-oriented
programming.
Yes you say that, but you never go into any detail about it. In what
way in particular is the concept and use of objects
Hello,
Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so
no further development in this area is needed. I am going to link you
to two more resources. If you feel that the first ever implementation
of object should mandate all others (such as the first insulins), then
I
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so no
further development in this area is needed. I am going to link you to two
more resources. If you feel that the first ever implementation
You seem to have missed my point and many references
too.
Try reading some of the references and come back with an informed
opinion, not just nit-picking at analogies I am providing to attempt to
help you understand (as I gather you would not be reading any
references I have provided, which
I have in fact read your references, not only just now, but again and
again I have read the wikipedia articles on the subject many moons
ago. Frankly I fail to see how any of it contradicts my position, but
they do contradict your position. I'm afraid I will have to throw up
my hands and give up
My sentiments exactly.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 27/10/2008, at 3:46 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have in fact read your references, not only just now, but again and
again I have read the wikipedia articles on the subject many moons
ago. Frankly I fail to see
18 matches
Mail list logo