Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Mark Harris
Anthony wrote: My sentiments exactly. On 27/10/2008, at 3:46 PM, "Breton Slivka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm afraid I will have to throw up my hands and give up on you. You are a lost cause. you cannot be reached. Oh, good. Can we return the list to web standards now? ***

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony
My sentiments exactly. Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 27/10/2008, at 3:46 PM, "Breton Slivka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have in fact read your references, not only just now, but again and again I have read the wikipedia articles on the subject many moons ago. Frankly I fail to

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Breton Slivka
I have in fact read your references, not only just now, but again and again I have read the wikipedia articles on the subject many moons ago. Frankly I fail to see how any of it contradicts my position, but they do contradict your position. I'm afraid I will have to throw up my hands and give up o

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
You seem to have missed my point and many references too. Try reading some of the references and come back with an informed opinion, not just nit-picking at analogies I am providing to attempt to help you understand (as I gather you would not be reading any references I have provided, which co

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Breton Slivka
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Ziebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so no > further development in this area is needed. I am going to link you to two > more resources. If you feel that the first ever implement

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Hello, Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so no further development in this area is needed. I am going to link you to two more resources. If you feel that the first ever implementation of object should mandate all others (such as the first insulins), then I we

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Breton Slivka
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Anthony Ziebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Breton, > > There is a difference between the use of object and object-oriented > programming. Yes you say that, but you never go into any detail about it. In what way in particular is the concept and use of "objects" i

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Breton, There is a difference between the use of object and object-oriented programming. Coad / Yourdon suggests object-oriented being classes and objects, inheritance and communication with messages. Does _javascript_ have classes? Can inheritance of _javascript_ occur without prototype? May

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Breton Slivka
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anthony Ziebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luke, > > Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question "Is JavaScript > object-orientated?". With that, and in closing, I would like to point out > that my comments were based on the actual question - asking if J

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Luke, Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question "Is _javascript_ object-orientated?". With that, and in closing, I would like to point out that my comments were based on the actual question - asking if _javascript_ were object-oriented, not if it has objects. Prototype has objects,

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Luke Hoggett
Indeed, as Alan Kay inventor of Smalltalk and OOP said "I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind." cheers L liorean wrote: 2008/10/24 James Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based. It can b

[WSG] Belinda Garfath/CO/HIC is out of the office. [SEC=No Protective Marking Present]

2008-10-26 Thread Belinda . Garfath
I will be out of the office starting 27/10/2008 and will not return until 28/10/2008. Keep track of your Medicare Claims History online . Register for Online Services today . NOTICE - This message is intended

RE: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information

2008-10-26 Thread Webb, KerryA
Michael wrote: > > If you were to be prosecuted the court (or more likely > HREOC/Administrative Appeals Tribunal before it got to court) would > consider what measures could be taken without imposing undue hardship > upon the service provider to ensure that equitable access is available > to pe

Re: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information

2008-10-26 Thread Andrew Boyd
Elizabeth, sorry to be a pedant on a Monday morning (erk!) - HREOC is now AHRC - the URL is the same though. Cheers, Andrew On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ben > > > > In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various > anti-discri

Replacing a paragraph with JS [was: Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please]

2008-10-26 Thread Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Brett Patterson wrote: On a different note, I have a problem with the JavaScript code I am writing. If you're going to begin a new topic, you should always begin a new thread to avoid confusing the old thread with irrelevant material and to attract potential readers who are disinterested in t

Re: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information

2008-10-26 Thread Michael Cordover
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 18:49, tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 25, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote: >> In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various >> anti-discrimination legislation, including the Disability Discrimination >> Act. [...] >> One form of discriminat

Re: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information

2008-10-26 Thread tee
On Oct 25, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote: Hi Ben In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various anti- discrimination legislation, including the Disability Discrimination Act. (It comes under the banner of ‘equal opportunities’ rather than ‘human rights’.) One fo