On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Ziebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so no > further development in this area is needed. I am going to link you to two > more resources. If you feel that the first ever implementation of object > should mandate all others (such as the first insulins), then I welcome you > to submit edits to this article.
You seem to have missed my point. My point was, if we are to count arbitrary deviations from smalltalk as discounting a language from being oop (such as a lack of classical inheritence), then the only OOP language is smalltalk. This is clearly absurd. Therefore, javascript must be OOP. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
