|
Luke, Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question "Is _javascript_ object-orientated?". With that, and in closing, I would like to point out that my comments were based on the actual question - asking if _javascript_ were object-oriented, not if it has objects. Prototype has objects, and it is of my opinion that _javascript_ is more prototype than anything else. Thanks, Anthony. Luke Hoggett wrote: Indeed, as Alan Kay inventor of Smalltalk and OOP said ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* |
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Andrew Brown
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Breton Slivka
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Andrew Brown
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please David Dorward
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Christian Snodgrass
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Luke Hoggett
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Breton Slivka
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Breton Slivka
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification plea... Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification plea... Breton Slivka
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification ... Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification ... Breton Slivka
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarifica... Anthony
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarifica... Mark Harris
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarifica... Brett Patterson
