Thank you
I have printed the email and have started to fix them.
That is way more that I expected. But that is why I
asked I need a professional eye
On 30/01/10 17:06, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 1/29/2010 08:36 PM, PurencoolGmail wrote:
The site is www.purencool.com
All I want to know is
thanks for your ideas
On 30/01/10 18:21, David Laakso wrote:
PurencoolGmail wrote:
Hi everyone,
I need a professional eye.
I have been developing this site for two weeks
(with help from this email group) and now that
I think I have finished. All I want to know is there
too much css?
The
thank you do you mean the menu images?
and I will look at the css
On 30/01/10 18:55, tee wrote:
The site is www.purencool.com
I caught a border:hidden in one of the h1 elements. Not wanting to sound like
a fool so I googled it first to see if this is something I have not learned to
I am trying to stear clear of jQuery so that I can
learn javaScript
Can you tell me what the error console says in firefox
I don't have a mac
On 31/01/10 06:12, jomali wrote:
I tried your calculator example on Mac OSX 10.6 in Firefox, Safari and
Chrome and it did not work in any of them.
Reply below:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:19 AM, PurencoolGmail purenc...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to stear clear of jQuery so that I can
learn javaScript
That makes sense. However, I'm not sure it's ethical to market yourself as a
Javascript programmer while you are only learning
@Dani
Well observed. I am using WordPress presets here. Not had much time
'proving' my accessibility skills on Semantix Blog, however feel free
to find such issues on Flexewebs.com.
@Peter Mount
I am not saying 'Accessibility does not matter!', I was asking a
question rather. I don't have an
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Jason Grant
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 1:06 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!
@Matthew Pennell
You are confused with the 'broken wrist' issue. If I have
@Thierry
I think keyboard accessibility is relatively easy thing to implement
as it tends to follow naturally if one uses even semi-decent semantic
HTML. It's not 'expensive' to implement. I would deem every browser
based solution a total fail if it didn't have keyboard accessibility
supported.
Accessibility does matter, but I do think that many people on this
list do get too close to the accessibility at all cost point of view.
Lets take the example of google finance http://www.google.com/finance?q=gbpaud
quite a cool site using flash and js to navigate quite a large
amount of
On 31/01/2010 22:50, Andrew Stewart wrote:
Whilst I think there are some silly impenetrable sites on the internet,
I don't think web developers should really be that concerned with
accessibility - not because it isn't worth it, but because we have
hardly any power over what the user sees. The
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Jason Grant
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 2:40 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!
@Thierry
I think keyboard accessibility is
On 31/01/2010 21:05, Jason Grant wrote:
Now for us to say that a solution costing £26M to develop, should have
another £1M invested into accessibility (testing, implementing, etc.)
is a bit of a far fetched argument to be honest. The way the given PLC
looks at it is that 'we just won't employ
My point about OS/browsers is that they can easily adjust the colours
displayed to the screen for the whole operating system, which makes
the whole computer more useable by colour blind users. Which is a much
better solution than spending hours removing reds/greens etc from your
site
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 2:51 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!
Accessibility does matter, but I do think that many people on this
list
Sorry to ask again, but please explain how the site could be made
accessible whilst maintaining the same ease of use?
On 1 Feb 2010, at 10:31, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: Sunday, January
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 3:46 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!
Sorry to ask again, but please explain how the site could be made
accessible whilst maintaining the same ease of use?
The same ease of use?!
Drop the mouse and give it a
On 31/01/2010 23:46, Andrew Stewart wrote:
Sorry to ask again, but please explain how the site could be made
accessible whilst maintaining the same ease of use?
Step one: make the flash itself keyboard accessible
http://www.google.com/search?q=flash+keyboard+access
Kbd users can then tab from
@Thierry
Why does Google not care about accessibility? Do they believe in
'Accessibility does not matter!' (rather than with ? at the end).
Isn't their behaviour the same as Microsoft's with regards to HTML?
Yes both of those mega-corporations are heavily involved in
'specifying the future HTML
And while we are on the topic of Google, their UX principles are as follows:
http://www.google.com/corporate/ux.html
Please pay attention to points 6 and 7 carefully.
Thanks,
Jason
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jason Grant ja...@flexewebs.com wrote:
@Thierry
Why does Google not care about
On 31/01/2010 23:23, Andrew Stewart wrote:
My point about OS/browsers is that they can easily adjust the colours
displayed to the screen for the whole operating system, which makes the
whole computer more useable by colour blind users. Which is a much
better solution than spending hours removing
On 01/02/2010 00:24, Jason Grant wrote:
@Thierry
Why does Google not care about accessibility? Do they believe in
'Accessibility does not matter!' (rather than with ? at the end).
Even large corporations can be as misguided as you, Jason.
Isn't their behaviour the same as Microsoft's with
Please let this be the final word...
A
On Jan 31, 2010, at 7:39 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
On 01/02/2010 00:24, Jason Grant wrote:
@Thierry
Why does Google not care about accessibility? Do they believe in
'Accessibility does not matter!' (rather than with ? at the end).
Even large
@Patrick
You seem to be very 'touched' by these genuine remarks I am making.
You should not jump to a (very wrong) conclusion that I don't know
much about accessibility. I am very comfortable within the area having
worked on making a major e-commerce site fully Web2.0 and AAA
accessible and
This discussion has been at times interesting (where there was healthy
exchange of info) and worrying (when personal criticisms were used
instead of calm discussions).
However, it looks like this thread has reached a point where we not
gaining anything - just expressing disagreement.
So,
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Jason Grant
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 4:24 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!
@Thierry
Why does Google not care about accessibility? Do they believe in
On 2010/01/31 22:40 (GMT) Jason Grant composed:
@Thierry
[...]
However I still feel that your examples are far fetched (i.e. unlikely).
I don't, but I do think you're doing your best to rationalize compounding the
difficulties that result from real-life accidents and disabilities, be they
Hi people,
A colleague has just asked me for some examples of Flash sites:
1. examples of flash sites which are not keyboard accessible (and/or
poor tab ordering)
2. examples of flash sites which ARE keyboard accessible
3. examples of flash sites which work well with screen readers
(He is
Hi,
I have inherited a website (http://www.koomaldreaming.com.au) with my
new job and in Safari and Chrome 3.x I have the content div floating
away from where it should be outside of the container div to the
right.
Any suggestions or help?
Thanks in advance
--
JP2 Designs
On 2010/02/01 14:52 (GMT+1100) Russ Weakley composed:
A colleague has just asked me for some examples of Flash sites:
1. examples of flash sites which are not keyboard accessible (and/or
poor tab ordering)
I can't see any pattern to tab ordering on
http://www.iontelevision.com/schedule.php
Hi Russ
http://www.monotone.com.au/
as far as I can see, no tab access at all.
Elizabeth Spiegel
Web editing
0409 986 158
GPO Box 729, Hobart TAS 7001
www.spiegelweb.com.au
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Russ
Jermayn Parker wrote:
Hi,
I have inherited a website (http://www.koomaldreaming.com.au) with my
new job and in Safari and Chrome 3.x I have the content div floating
away from where it should be outside of the container div to the
right.
Any suggestions or help?
Corrections on the CSS
Hi Elizabeth,
Once I give the Flash block on that site focus by clicking it, tabbing works
fine.
I couldn't find an alternative way of giving it focus.
Thanks,
Tatham Oddie
au mob: +61 414 275 989, us cell: +1 213 422 7068, skype: tathamoddie,
landline: +61 2 8011 3982, fax: +61 2 9475 5172
Russ Weakley wrote:
Hi people,
A colleague has just asked me for some examples of Flash sites:
1.
2.
3.
Russ
4. Mousetype.
http://www.universalsprout.com/
~d
--
desktop
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
mobile
http://chelseacreekstudio.mobi/
33 matches
Mail list logo
