kvnmcwebn wrote:
hello,
that did the trick
it would be nice if it worked with the width: auto; but its a lot
better now if the whole buttons hot.
I guess you meant *without* the width:auto... so I think I have good news
for you ;)
Try display:inline-block instead of width:auto
HTH,
Thierry |
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I guess you meant *without* the width:auto... so I think I have good
news for you ;)
Try display:inline-block instead of width:auto
Or, better, remove the *extra* float declaration you have for these anchors
;-(
That declaration *resets* the first one and you end up
kvnmcwebn wrote:
Hello,
Whats the best way to make the bellow css buttons hot for the entire
height in ie? Right now there just hot over the text. I tried adding
a fixed pixel height to the a: rule but that didnt work so well.
I've seen this solution online somewhere before but im on a
Not sure what you mean. The CSS works as expected (horizontal navbar) with
the follwing HTML:
ul id=drNav
lia href=#item/a/li
lia href=#item/a/li
lia href=#item/a/li
lia href=#item/a/li
lia href=#item/a/li
/ul
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
Whats the best way to make the bellow css buttons hot
--- kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats the best way to make the bellow css buttons
hot for the entire height
in ie? Right now there just hot over the text. I
tried adding a fixed pixel
height to the a: rule but that didnt work so well.
I've seen this solution online somewhere before
its supposed to look
http://www.mcmonagle.biz/nav.htm
also-thanks for the response terrance.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: 31 August 2005 20:18
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] css buttons only hot
kvnmcwebn wrote:
Hello Thierry,
Thanks for the solution but maybe theres something in the struture of
my html that dosnt work with that method. Check it if you have a
minute. Both pages
work fine in firefox.
http://www.mcmonagle.biz/nav2.htm
It blows out the nav bar, fixes the hotspot
22:25
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] css buttons only hot over text in ie
kvnmcwebn wrote:
Hello Thierry,
Thanks for the solution but maybe theres something in the struture of
my html that dosnt work with that method. Check it if you have a
minute. Both pages
work fine
Em 19/ago/2005, às 12:00, Jad Madi escreveu:
hi, i'm trying to the logo over the main-nav any suggestions?
http://easyhttp.com/css/css-ads.html
Hi there Jad.
Just make it all a image. or split that banner in two in the vertical
Just see what i did here http://estacaoshopping.com.pt/
Just
G'day
I'm trying to combine a CSS image rollover with a drop down menu.
Everything is working fine bar the css image rollover.
For some reason the a:hover is not being read. I've probably missed
something very simple but just can't see it.
Your HTML:
lia id=Home title=Home
At 05:05 PM 6/14/2005, Richard Czeiger wrote:
Wondering how we can get CSS to specifity the spearator used in ordered
lists (ie: the thing between the list item number and the value of the
list item). For example...
1.
a)
1 -
a:
I would argue that this is perfectly
G'day
Paul Novitski wrote:
I would argue that this is perfectly good markup styling:
ol
li1 - Aardvark/li
li2 - Banshee/li
li3 - Cicada/li
/ol
and then:
ol li
{
list-style-type: none;
}
At 12:54 AM 6/15/2005, Bert Doorn wrote:
G'day
Paul Novitski wrote:
I would argue that this is perfectly good markup styling:
ol
li1 - Aardvark/li
li2 - Banshee/li
li3 - Cicada/li
/ol
and then:
ol li
{
Paul Novitski wrote:
What about using ULs in this case? (That's how I originally marked up
my example; should have left it like that!) How would a screen-reader
read this:
ul
li1 - Aardvark/li
li2 - Banshee/li
li3 - Cicada/li
Bert Doorn
I don't have access to jaws or the like, but what about
semantics? Is it an unordered list made to look like an ordered
list, or an ordered list using the wrong element?
I seem to remember, from my days with JAWS 4, that it would be read
out as List with 3 itemsbullet; 1
Bert,
Or what about simple normal every-day headings? We can go up to 6
levels deep with them...
I guess it all depends on the application.
I think using headings is a very good suggestion.
In legislation, the numbered entries we are talking about are indeed
headings for sections, sub
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 10:10 +0100, Patrick Lauke wrote:
I think that this (particularly the legal document case) is a
scenario in which we have to recognise that there *is* no widely supported
semantic equivalent.
I'd agree with this statement, however, in terms of structuring your
content in
Bert, Patrick and all.
The issue of semantics, presentation and accessibility for
legislation is a really good example of the genuine social importance
of what people like members of WSG do.
The law is central to our society. We probably all know the maxim
ignorance of the law is no
Richard,
Wondering how we can get CSS to specifity the spearator used in
ordered lists (ie: the thing between the list item number and the
value of the list item). For example...
1.
a)
1 -
a:
I need this ability to replicate government legislation and
apparently
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Wondering how we can get CSS to specifity the spearator used in ordered
lists
As far as I can tell, you should be able to define that with the styles
provided for automatic numbering and lists in CSS 2.1
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#counters
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS List Separator
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Wondering how we can get CSS to specifity the spearator used in ordered
lists
As far as I can tell, you should be able to define that with the styles
provided for automatic numbering and lists in CSS 2.1
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21
I need this ability to replicate government legislation and
apparently it has to be an EXACT duplicate. As far as I can tell,
this isn't in the spec. Has anyone found a solution? Some fancy CSS
hack or DOM scripting that will get around this?
If that EXACT is truly non-negotiable, as in, it
Wondering how we can get CSS to specifity the spearator used in ordered
lists (ie: the thing between the list item number and the value of the list
item). For example...
As someone has already mentioned,
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/generate.html#counters will eventually
be the way to do
On 15 Jun 2005, at 12:19 PM, John Allsopp wrote:
numbering is a very important part of the content of some documents
(particularly legislation) and so should be in the content of the HTML
I completely agree, and have been involved in translating legislation
into a web format. It's a shame
On Tuesday, June 14, 2005 9:56 PM, Terrence Wood wrote:
I completely agree, and have been involved in translating legislation
into a web format. It's a shame that the start attribute has been
deprecated in XHTML (last I looked).
Well, there is always HTML 4.01 for these cases (legislation,
On 15 Jun 2005, at 11:11 am, Derek Featherstone wrote:
As has already been said, simply choosing the right DOCTYPE for the
job may
not be enough, though, given that we still don't really know to what
degree
punctuation matters.
I've been busy putting a law text on a web page (alongside
Do you have a DTD declaration at the top of your
HTML? It can make quite
a difference to how IE works with CSS, especially
with tables and
percentage font sizes. And older versions of IE do
different things to
IE6 too.
Hi,
Thanks for all the good suggestions. It was neither my
G'day
Has any one encountered problems with IE when using
CSS style sheets? I'm making a web page with a menu
using tables (which I think might be causing the
problem in the first place)
It may, since the content of tables often does not inherit font
settings on a container element or even
It may, since the content of tables often does not
inherit font
settings on a container element or even the body
If it has to stay in a table, add a rule in your css
for that
table (give it an id or class) and see if that fixes
the
immediate problem.
Thanks for replying so fast, it
G'day again
Thanks for replying so fast, it didn't work though.
I have assigned each element in my menu a class
either:
Sounds like overkill to me, but hard to be specific without
seeing the page.
a.menu {background-color: #FF; color: #0066CC;
text-align: left; text-decoration: bold;
Hi Nanna,
I think you'll find that if you give the relevant td's a font size, this
should overcome the problem.
Fingers crossed!
Tim.
It may, since the content of tables often does not
inherit font
settings on a container element or even the body
If it has to stay in a table, add a rule in
Nanna,
Has any one encountered problems with IE when using
CSS style sheets?
Yes, _lots_!!
Do you have a DTD declaration at the top of your HTML? It can make quite
a difference to how IE works with CSS, especially with tables and
percentage font sizes. And older versions of IE do
Nothing wrong with styling states with CSS, but there is plenty wrong
with using javascript to overwrite CSS states when you could do
exactly the same thing with CSS.
However, adding javascript to make a browser work like the others do
is fine, but you should try to compress it some what, to save
On 5/24/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is said that flyout and dropdown menus belong to the behavior layer and
that CSS should not be used to accomplish such things.
Also, because this technique relies on CSS *and* Scripting it overlaps 2
layers; and that's supposed to be bad
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:00 +0200, Michael Lykke wrote:
Im just wondering - Cause sometimes it seems to me that alot of effort
is put into making something correct way beyond just adhering to the
webstandards. Like asking whether it is ok to use list definitions
when the list only has a single
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Nothing wrong with styling states with CSS, but there is plenty wrong
with using javascript to overwrite CSS states when you could do
exactly the same thing with CSS.
However, adding javascript to make a browser work like the others do
is fine, but you should try to
Do you mean something like
div.picture + h3 {...}
I'm pretty sure I mean that - I am, perhaps, confused on what the plus
(+) sign does.
I was under the impression that your example meant this:
div class=picture
h3.../h3
/div
.. rather than this:
div class=picture
...
/div
h3.../h3
Matt Thommes wrote:
I'm pretty sure I mean that - I am, perhaps, confused on what the plus
(+) sign does.
I was under the impression that your example meant this:
Have a good read through http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/selector.html
--
Patrick H. Lauke
I'm just saying that its silly to reinvent things like :hover with
javascript and DOM but its perfectly fine to write javascript to fix
browser incompatability (IE doesn't support :hover on all elements).
On 5/25/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Nothing wrong
How well supported is this method - the +??
Any documentation of that?
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Matt Thommes wrote:
I'm pretty sure I mean that - I am, perhaps, confused on what the plus
(+) sign does.
I was under the impression that your example meant this:
Have a good read through
On 25 May 2005, at 9:42 am, Chris Stratford wrote:
How well supported is this method - the +??
Any documentation of that?
The usual suspects: Firefox, Safari, Omniweb, Opera, IE Mac all handle
this correctly.
For the browser with way too much market share, you'll need Dean's IE7.
on your site is says
What's Bad
We're using CSS for another purpose than presentation.
why is it that bad?
On 5/24/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For people interested in à la suckerfish menus, this one now allows
tabbing navigation in MSIE too:
Frederic Fery wrote:
on your site is says
What's Bad
We're using CSS for another purpose than presentation.
why is it that bad?
It is said that flyout and dropdown menus belong to the behavior layer and
that CSS should not be used to accomplish such things.
Also, because this technique
Cb2 Web Design wrote:
It is a empty comment hack: html/**/body selector, that seems to be
applied only by I.E. 6.x
http://www.cb2web.com/tut_csshack.shtml
Haven't seen that variant in the wild yet.
My general response to this, and any hack, is in the headlines and
start-paragraphs on this
Nice find!
I've tested (using your test page) on my copy of Internet Explorer:
First: blue (not effected)
Secont: red (effected)
Thrid: black (not effected)
Hope that helps you.
On 5/22/05, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cb2 Web Design wrote:
It is a empty comment hack:
G'day
I've noticed that the CSS 'line-height' property provides extra
spacing between list items, such as in an ordered list, unordered
list, as well as definition lists.
...
I was wondering if anyone else uses 'line-height' - or do most people
use 'margin'?
I'd stick with margins (or padding)
Matt Thommes wrote:
I've noticed that the CSS 'line-height' property provides extra
spacing between list items, such as in an ordered list, unordered
list, as well as definition lists.
I try to favor line-height rather than padding if I'm dealing with an
element that is styled with a height
The Man With His Guide Dog At The Tent Store wrote:
I do not know if this is off topic. Can CSS be used to change
background and foreground colors to create a more accessible web
site.? If so, how? Or please direct me to a web site that discusses
the topic.
Alternative styles article:
Kerri McKenna wrote:
Hi everyone,
I realize that /* */ are used to add comments to CSS, but I'm not
clear on what /* \*/ means, or what the single asterisk is used for.
/* */ pairs alone are comments, yes, but they are also used as hacks
when they are used in the right sequence. Some browsers
Kerri McKenna wrote:
Hi everyone,
I realize that /* */ are used to add comments to CSS, but I'm not
clear on what /* \*/ means, or what the single asterisk is used for.
Kerri
PS - I've only just joined the list so I do apologize if this is
perceived as off topic.
---
Excerpt
Hi, it's a CSS filter to rule out IE5Mac, see
http://www.dithered.com/css_filters/css_only/escaped_comment_end.html
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
This is a hack to send a style to Internet Explorer on windows and
not mac.
IMHO, IE CCs are a better alternative to this hack:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
On 12 May 2005, at 5:15 am, Drake, Ted C. wrote:
This is a hack to send a style to Internet Explorer on windows and not
mac.
/* \*/ hides it from IE Mac, which doesn't understand the escape \
It would be better formulated as:
'A filter to hide the next rule block from IE Mac'.
In full:
/* hide
On May 3, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Amit Karmakar wrote:
http://www.ilovejackdaniels.com/css_cheat_sheet.png
Neat! Now the desktop pic on my second monitor. ;)
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
--
www.browsehappy.com
www.opera.com
http://brucelawson.co.uk/garden
?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Rebecca Cox wrote:
Don't know if anyone remembers seeing a sort of rip off of CSS Zen
Garden a while back? Someone did a manky looking old school design, not
on the main site.
Off topic, but I remember Dave Shea sending me a chuckling reply when I
pointed him to my own - admittedly super simple
On 4/18/05, Rebecca Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Don't know if anyone remembers seeing a sort of rip off of CSS Zen
Garden a while back? Someone did a manky looking old school design, not
on the main site.
I'm after the URL if anyone has it.
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
You could try to move the UL just before the text box and then use *float*
rather than an AP div...
I grudgingly did that to work around Opera's bug (just doesn't feel
right to have options before the actual input in the document flow...but
hey)
Also, after attempting in
0s 9 comments -for what there worth,
in ie5.2 mac-
messy overlaps w/radio buttons and text. positioning of google search button
isnt right. maybe the backslash hack would do the trick if you feel inclined
to support this browser.
looks good in mozilla mac os 9
-kvnmcwebn
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:53:14 +0100, Patrick Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure it's a bug in (Win) Opera's absolute
positioning implementation, but annoying nonetheless...
would anybody be able to suggest a simple fix to
get the advanced search/preferences list to align properly
next
Kornel Lesinski
The funny thing is, that in my Opera 8b3/win your XHTML
is pixel-perfect with original Firefox startpage,
Interesting. In my copy of Opera 8 (can't remember which beta, but it's
build 7401) I have the Advanced Search / Preferences to the right of
the actual FF logo, completely
On 11 Apr 2005, at 10:28 pm, Patrick Lauke wrote:
but in Firefox 1.0+ (nightly 20050407) you can see
pretty nasty bug - submit button overlaps radio buttons.
Again, on my FF 1.0.1 and FF 1.1 at home, it only overlaps at
very, very small font sizes.
Could you email me screenshots off list, if it's
Patrick Lauke schrieb:
Kornel Lesinski
The funny thing is, that in my Opera 8b3/win your XHTML
is pixel-perfect with original Firefox startpage,
Interesting. In my copy of Opera 8 (can't remember which beta, but it's
build 7401) I have the Advanced Search / Preferences to the right of
the actual
Patrick Lauke schrieb:
I'm pretty sure it's a bug in (Win) Opera's absolute
positioning implementation, but annoying nonetheless...
would anybody be able to suggest a simple fix to
get the advanced search/preferences list to align properly
next to the input on my frugal google experiment
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
The problem stems form this in the default forms.css
legend {
...
position: static ! important;
float: none ! important;
}
Ingo Chao wrote:
I think the problem is in the browser default /res/form.css:
legend { ... float: none ! important; }
Well that's just
On 12 Apr 2005, at 10:30 am, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Well that's just peachy...so basically, there's no way to override
this, as it will always take precedence over anything I can do with my
styles thanks to the ! important. Interestingly, these rules weren't
in my forms.css, but now that I've
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 02:30:24 +0100, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Well that's just peachy...so basically, there's no way to override
this, as it will always take precedence over anything I can do with
my styles thanks to the ! important. Interestingly, these rules
weren't in my forms.css, but now
would anybody be able to suggest a simple fix to
get the advanced search/preferences list to align properly
next to the input on my frugal google experiment
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/74/ ?
You could try to move the UL just before the text box and then use *float*
rather than an
I think it's a very intresting question! :) We always talk about clear
coding in xhtml, but which is the best way to write a css?
I think this could be a starting point discussion.
I normally write my css to follow the structure of the xhtml:
/* Main layout*/
...
...
/* Nav */
...
...
/* Sub nav */
...
...
/* Content */
...
...
/* Side Content */
...
...
/* Footer */
...
...
I also tend to split my css in different files.
structure.css - keep all structure css
And what about the properties order? Generally I use to do something like this:
a {
font:1em sans-serif; color:#333; font-weight:bold;
text-decoration:none;
margin:1em; padding:0.5em;
background:#ddd; border-bottom:1px solid #ccc;
}
First I set the font and text properties, than the
C Slack
Having sorted out the html code to make it more readable and
modifiable
it seems that we have shifted the mess to style sheets. Many of the
sheets I look at are long, comment-less and very difficult to
understand.
So that I don't fall into the same trap, can anyone recommend
Jacobus wrote:
I also tend to split my css in different files.
structure.css - keep all structure css
Text.css - all text related formatting
Small.css - used in style switcher to set text to small
Medium.css - used in style switcher to set text to medium
Large.css - used in style switcher to set
Thanks Patrick and others.
For the record I think that the Malarkey URL you refer to is:
http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/stylesheet_ordering.html
It has given me lots of things to think about.
Regards,
Charlie
Patrick Lauke wrote:
C Slack
Having sorted out the html code to make
!
Angela
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
part de Jacobus van Niekerk
Envoyé : jeudi 7 avril 2005 12:09
À : wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Objet : RE: [WSG] CSS Document layout/structure
I normally write my css to follow the structure
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:33:58 +0100, C Slack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I group and sort properties in rule like this:
selector {
positioning; floats;
width; height;
margin; padding;
border;
color; background;
text-; font-;
}
For programming languages I prefer Allman style of
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:44:52 +0100, Piero Fissore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
#menu {
width: [$menuwidth-$menupadding-2*5px];
padding: $menupadding;
border: 5px solid red;
}
Mmm, cool! But does it really help you?
During development - a lot.
I usually put menu after content in document - this
] On
Behalf Of Ricci Angela
Sent: 07 April 2005 12:30
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS Document layout/structure
Hi!
I always do the same: I group styles of the same nature, beggining
by redefining default values where it is needed, and then by page structure
Hi Charlie,
I know what you mean, I did many redesign stuff and find out that I wasn't
able to understand my own css file (that was awful).
You can see a sample at http://www.echo3d.com/css/screen.css
It looks complex but if you pay attention, you'll see that everything is
in order.
Here is some
Hi!
I split the rules into different files:
general.css
layout.css
elements.css
In these files I try to use container centric selectors. That
means: if the XHTML is structured like this:
div id=container1
div id=container2
div id=container3
p/p
/div
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:22:04 +0200, Martin Heiden wrote:
I split the rules into different files:
general.css
layout.css
elements.css
Are you seeing much overhead in load time?
I've put off doing the same for that reason.
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
Elysian Systems -
-Original Message-
From: Hugues Brunelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 April 2005 14:17
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS Document layout/structure
Hi Charlie,
I know what you mean, I did many redesign stuff and find out
: April 7, 2005 07:33
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Document layout/structure
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:17:01 +0100, Hugues Brunelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can see a sample at http://www.echo3d.com/css/screen.css
It looks complex but if you pay attention,
Why aren't you
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:41:55 -0500, Hugues Brunelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes you're right, it it just because I'm always changing my declarations
so
I let them on the long formulation :)
I know that soon I'll have to simplified these declarations.
Hugues
[...]
border-top-width: 0px;
To add to readability of your css you should also consider the layout
of the individual css rules as well as their
organisation/categorisation.
Using typical whitespacing that applies to most coding standards you
can come up with the usual layout:
.className {
property: propertyValue;
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:26:50 +0100, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:55:52 +0100, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
border: 0; border-bottom: 0.1em dotted #781B11;
Property redefined.
That's correct.
The shorthand property border already defines
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:06:32 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Granted. Is there any browser software will not render the shortest
declaration? http://www.dlaakso.com/border.html
Best,
David
Both look the same-Opera 7.54u2 Mac...
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
It's fascinating to see so many CSS styling standards. What makes perfect
sense to one person can be nonsensical to the next. Clearly what makes
styling work for any author is consistency and thoughtful logic -- even if
that logic is idiosyncratic.
Here's what I do:
Any given page can have
Im also interested in this As I'm a programmer I had started laying out my
css like code, so that id have:
#nav{}
#nav p{}
#nav ul{}
#nav ul li{}
Which to me made sense and was nice and clear. But the problem was that things
are not related 1 to 1... the #nav ul li{} may
Another thing to consider is whether other people have to read your CSS.
If working in groups (or still learning) its best to minimise redundancy.
see http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2005/01/20/redundancy_v/
cheers,
Grant
Having sorted out the html code to make it more readable and
I'm also from a programming background. Lately I've been working to try
to take advantage of the inheritance in CSS. So, I start with a base.css
(or global.css) and as the CSS grows, I break out portions specific to a
portion of the interface out into seperate files.
For instance, start with
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:23:31 -0400, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What do you guys think of useing css expressions to mimic
standards-compliant behavior. (hidden, of course, from the good browsers)
If you mean *ie expressions,* they work out well for me.
One useful example I found would
David Laakso wrote:
One useful example I found would be something
like this:
http://blogs.clearscreen.com/migs/archive/2004/12/23/676.aspx
(could not locate remote server)
Funny, it works well for me? Anyways, it's just a nice article on wo
to make use of css selectors in IE.
Richard
http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/04/12/index4a.html and
http://www.htmldog.com/ptg/archives/55.php are useful articles about
mobile phone browsers
a useful post to the WSG from a while back by Kenneth Feldman is quoted
below:
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web
Dave Barnett wrote:
The URL is: http://www.flinders.edu.au/
We have tested the page on all available browser/system setups without
a hitch, but we periodically receive emails from people complaining
about tiny font sizes.
Due to your style:
body {font: normal 0.75em/127% ...
Hi,
I occasionally run into this when developing sites.
I far as I can tell, I am hitting some weird key combination that
decreases the font, because when I go to View - Text Size - Medium its
all back to normal. This happened to me last week (text was small i ie
6.1 and firefox 1.0 ) so
G'day
The URL is: http://www.flinders.edu.au/
We have tested the page on all available browser/system setups without a
hitch, but we periodically receive emails from people complaining about
tiny font sizes.
Problem is caused by this line to start off with:
font: normal 0.75em/127% Verdana,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:11:36 +1030, Dave Barnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The URL is: http://www.flinders.edu.au/
We have tested the page on all available browser/system setups without a
hitch, but we periodically receive emails from people complaining about
tiny font sizes.
As mentioned
Thank you that solved the problem in IE.
Matt
From: Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Css Floating Image
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:12:31 +1100
-Original Message-
From: M M [mailto
I get the same response, so would seem to be a bug; perhaps submit a bug
report to w3c? (Our company has sent in a bug report for the w3c xhtml 1.1
validator the other week, so don't treat it as absolutely perfect!!)
Siggy
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Stefanenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
601 - 700 of 989 matches
Mail list logo
