RE: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-09 Thread michael.brockington
To my eyes, the reason is that the font itself is larger on the right hand side. Naturally this will give a larger line-height, unless you have specified otherwise. Regards, Mike Mike Brockington Web Development Specialist www.calcResult.com www.stephanieBlakey.me.uk www.edinburgh.gov.uk This

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Jens-Uwe Korff wrote: I'm running into big rendering differences between Google Chrome and Safari 3.1/PC. They are said to render pages the same, given that they're using the same Webkit engine. They're using the WebKit engine, not necessarily the same version. Safari is at version 3.2.1 last

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Simon Pascal Klein
I think this comes down more to which font rasterisation engine a system is using. I don’t think Safari on Windows for example has full access to AAT and Quartz and thus will render type using ClearType and GDI on Windows. Add Firefox into the mix which uses Cairo and you’ll get different

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Johan Douma
Hi everybody, Even though Chrome is based on Webkit, Chrome actually uses another graphics/rendering engine (the drawing layer) called Skia (source code: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/skia/). A bit like the javascript engines, Google didn't use webkits' javascript engine

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Johan Douma
Just though I'd let you know about this, I actually think this is a pretty serious problem, because it breaks a lot of scripts and doesn't conform with the other browsers even though it conforms to the javascript spec. V8 (chrome's js engine) can take the values in an array in a random order. If

RE: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread michael.brockington
Any script that relies on an array being ordered, without actually doing a sort() is seriously deficient. As you mentioned yourself, this behaviour is entirely in agreement with the JS spec. Regards, Mike From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Johan Douma
I said indeed serious problem, although that is indeed debatable. for in should indeed be used carefully, it's not quite reliable and browsera all have different behaviours, although chrome's behaviour is the most unreliable (if we can call it like that) due to the order of elements returned.

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Christian Montoya
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Johan Douma Sent: 08 January 2009 11:22 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they? Just though I'd let you know about this, I actually think this is a

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread David Hucklesby
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:36:45 +1100, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote: Hi experts, I'm running into big rendering differences between Google Chrome and Safari 3.1/PC. They are said to render pages the same, given that they're using the same Webkit engine. The differences seem to be mainly due to the

RE: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Jens-Uwe Korff
Hi all, thanks for your suggestions. I'm attaching a side-by-side comparison of a snippet of the page since I cannot put any code live, hoping the attachment gets delivered. Safari is on the left, Chrome on the right. If you cannot see the attachment, it shows how the graphical background

[WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-07 Thread Jens-Uwe Korff
Hi experts, I'm running into big rendering differences between Google Chrome and Safari 3.1/PC. They are said to render pages the same, given that they're using the same Webkit engine. The differences seem to be mainly due to the different font rendering. Safari's fonts are way smaller, hence my