I rather liked the conditionals around the body. What's not to like?
Imho, it goes against the separation of structure and presentation
(plus it
messes up with the cascade), but I can understand why they are doing
this.
Since most people strongly believe that CSS validation is a must,
th
> I rather liked the conditionals around the body. What's not to like?
Imho, it goes against the separation of structure and presentation (plus it
messes up with the cascade), but I can understand why they are doing this.
Since most people strongly believe that CSS validation is a must, they have
Like the site says, it's "delete-key friendly" :-)
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
>>
>> http://html5boilerplate.com/
>>
>> Looks pretty good to me... w
On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
http://html5boilerplate.com/
Looks pretty good to me... what say ye?
Some useful ideas there, although I won't be using it "as-is."
Thanks for sharing.
Cordially,
David
--
*
On 12/08/2010 14:55, Hugo Mendes wrote:
I'm sorry to disappoint you guys, but an "HTML5 Professional Template"
with BROWSER DETECTION (those conditional comments in the markup) is
not a best practice.
It's certainly ugly, but a very pragmatic way of having style fixes for
the various broken ve
; Webmaster & ERP Administrator
>>> 800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
>>> 330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
>>> www.lexi.com
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
>>> Behalf Of
ebstandardsgroup.org] On
>> Behalf Of Tom Livingston
>> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:58 AM
>> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
>> Subject: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate
>>
>> Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a produ
@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Livingston
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:58 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a p
bstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:58 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
http://html5boilerplate.com/
Looks pretty good t
What is " profrontend template " ?
Tnx
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Un
I find it works really well
minimal files & overhead with lots of addition life smoothing extras
(in my case *it* refers to profrontend template rather than boilerplate but
has same practices)
I would be interested to hear what others have to say too :)
- S
On 12 August 2010 12:57, Tom Livi
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
http://html5boilerplate.com/
Looks pretty good to me... what say ye?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
12 matches
Mail list logo
