I was wondering if people had any opinions on when its acceptable if at all for a
layout to break when users increase font size.
Sites I am working on look fine if text is increased or decreased 1 or 2 times but
when they are increased repeatedly the layout goes a bit whacky in some browsers
My understanding is that if all elements are relative/proportional, the layouts should
never break.
--
On Tuesday, 28 September 2004 4:14 PM, Focas, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if people had any opinions on when its
acceptable if at
Usually there isn't much you can do in these situations.
I just ignore it.
If you can double the font size, that should be more than enough.
If someone needs it bigger - then they are going to be used to broken
sites anyway...
Any bigger and it becomes too hard to manage. You need to draw a line
Yes, if all elements are proportional the layouts never break, increase
or decrease size as same the font.
Take a look: http://www.gestoriagarcia.net
It's my latest work, incerase or decrease the size.
Sorry for my english.
cesar | cesargarcia.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your English is good, but Safari on the Mac makes a hash of your site.
http://www.imagine-hosting.com/images/gestoriagarcia_Safari.jpg
On Tuesday, 28 September 2004 6:41 PM, cesargarcia.com|cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, if all elements are
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I'm attempting my first fixed background, and I have one question and
need one solution to a problem.
question: is it supposed to work in IE?
problem: in FF, even though I believe the syntax is correct, it's not
fixing. I have a sidepanel ID created specifically to house
Opsss.
it will try to solve it.
as I can see my sites in safari ?
I use Windows
Thanks
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Andrew Thompson
Enviado el: martes, 28 de septiembre de 2004 10:56
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [WSG]
I have been developing a catalogue/shopping cart site for a client and have
come across the following problem in IE. For some reason, every now and then,
a rectangular patch of the background shows though. A screen capture of this
is available at:
http://www.madforit.com.au/brothers/ie.jpg
Hi,
This is my first request for help to this list I think. Hope it's
appropriate since it's kind of a CSS help thing but I can't bear going back
on css-discuss if you know what I mean. ;-)
At here:
http://www.lucernemedia.com/
I'm trying to shrink the whitespace after the video titles
Hi Ned
I'm at work, so am being forced to use IE5.5 (entirely against my will, I
assure you). The content is dropping below the menu. Afraid I can't offer a
solution at the moment as my pc/ie won't let me view the css (yes, I love my
Win95 pc...) - I imagine it's something to do with widths
Hi Rick, Welcome to the group :D
as for the whitespace around the P have you removed padding and margin from it?
and if so have you removed it from any surrounding elemenets? thats normaly
the main cause of whitespace around a P
Hope that helps you on your way a bit...
Mark Harwood
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Box floating, footer placement, completion of column
Hi, I normally just lurk and listen in on everyone here
On 9/28/04 4:06 AM Mark Harwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
as for the whitespace around the P have you removed padding and margin from
it?
and if so have you removed it from any surrounding elemenets? thats normaly
the main cause of whitespace around a P
All I've specified for p is a
Rick,
You could put margin:0 in .video_title and .video_synop and that should
fix the space issue.
You might want to consider more semantic code though, perhaps use the h
element (or even a definition list?).
cameron.
Rick Faaberg wrote:
Hi,
This is my first request for help to this list I
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:27:43 +0100, john [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I'm attempting my first fixed background, and I have one question and
need one solution to a problem.
question: is it supposed to work in IE?
It only seems to work for me in IE, if it is the background
Title: RE: [WSG] shrinking p whitespace
Hi Rick
I have altered the markup as follows:
table id=releases
tr
thNew video releases (all available in VHS, DVD, and Digital)/th
/tr
tr
tdh3Electing the President 2004: How the Electoral College Works/h3
Including footage of the 2004
Title: RE: [WSG] fixed background...
Try the following link, I have used fixed.js and it sorts out ie
http://www.doxdesk.com/software/js/fixed.html
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Parker Torrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2004 12:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like I need to do some work on my spelling as well as my html/css :)
I'm at work, so am being forced to use IE5.5 (entirely against my will, I
assure you). The content is dropping below the menu. Afraid I can't offer a
solution at the moment as my pc/ie won't let me view the css (yes, I
Hi everyone
I was recently told by a friend that there is talk of a browser to be
released soon by Google called gBrowser
I have googled for any news on it, and what support for standards it may
have, but haven't really heard much..
To keep on topic, has anyone heard whether it will follow
Webstandards wrote:
Their toolbar is IE only (a Mozilla version project at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/google-toolbar/ has not moved in ages),
so I am hoping they aren't going to base on IE
Not sure about the gBrowser, but there is a version of the Google
toolbar for Firefox at
On 28 sep 2004, at 08.37, Francesco wrote:
I am developing using ASP.NET, which we all know is not XHTML
compliant,
Hi.
You may be interested in the articles at ASP.NET Resources [1], more
specifically Producing XHTML-Compliant Pages With Response Filters [2],
which explains how to clean up the
Well, I did manage to get a warning from Google that our service
(GMail) may not look right because you aren't using IE message, so the
hopes of them NOT using IE as a backend? Slim. Corporations like Google
are probably going to jump on ease of use and/or popularity.
Still, it'd be nice to
Webstandards wrote:
Hi everyone
I was recently told by a friend that there is talk of a browser to be
released soon by Google called gBrowser
I have googled for any news on it, and what support for standards it may
have, but haven't really heard much..
The talk is that GBrowser will be based
Will do.
Has anybody else looked at my code? Can some suggestions be offered,
please?
Thanks.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
Peter Goddard wrote:
Try the following link, I have used fixed.js and it sorts out ie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was recently told by a friend that there is talk of a browser to be
released soon by Google called gBrowser
I have googled for any news on it, and what support for standards it
may
have, but haven't really heard much..
Its been reported they have hired 4 IE
On Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004, at 20:29 Australia/Sydney, Rick Faaberg wrote:
At here:
http://www.lucernemedia.com/
I'm trying to shrink the whitespace after the video titles
(.video_title is
the relevant style I'm pretty sure).
See anything obvious that's keeping the whitespace so big after the
The 'fixed' property for element background images works in IE only for the
body selector, and fails in all other cases.
Cheers,
Kevin
On 28/9/04 7:27 PM, john [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I'm attempting my first fixed background, and I have one question and
need one
In a developers meeting today I was asked about AOL, should we test with it...
What do you do? What considerations are there for AOl?
Ted
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04
Hi everyone
We have been trying to get a calendar popup function for our web site to work. I know
there are a lot of them out there but I'd like to know if you have a favorite. I'm
talking about clicking into a form field for a date, having a calendar appear, click
on the calendar's date, and
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:15:25 -0700, Ted Drake wrote:
In a developers meeting today I was asked about AOL, should we test
with it...
What do you do? What considerations are there for AOl?
If it is a redevelopment, I look to the logs for the current site -
what is the percentage of AOL
There's also the rumour of the google browser bug that was in Bugzilla
(but then was made private and no longer appears):
http://www.deftone.com/blogzilla/archives/google_browser.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jason Turnbull
Sent:
AOL browser is uses the IE engine, does it not?
Ted Drake wrote:
In a developers meeting today I was asked about AOL, should we test with it...
What do you do? What considerations are there for AOl?
Ted
**
The discussion list for
On 9/28/04 7:08 PM Ryan Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
AOL browser is uses the IE engine, does it not?
I think they switched to Gecko.
Rick Faaberg
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web
33 matches
Mail list logo
