Johan's frontpage with the embedded Flash feature
http://www.assetnow.com/anx/index.cfm/1,8,20,html works splendidly on
my Safari 1.2.3 on Mac OS X3.4
Albert
--
On Sep 21, 2004, at 1:31 AM, Johan Steenkamp wrote:
I
My browser Safari 1.2.3 works just fine with Flash embed
apparently in Satay context. I also had no trouble getting
a live Flash with Macromedia default, Flash Satay, and
Hixie as per Mark's chart/s.
I must have a Mystical, Magical Mystery iMac (Summer 2000),
OS X3.4
Albert
On Sep 22, 2004, at
I haven't tried putting it in the body...I'll toy around with that. If
that doesn't work, I'll test that javascript that Peter sent. Thanks.
Anybody have some pointers as to why it's not doing it in FF? I'm sorry
if I'm missing some basic list etiquette...am I supposed to post the
code, or
Ian
Your site, House Doctor, is working well in its Flash features, both
the moving
hand in the clock (ad) and the pix-rotation portrait. I'm working my
way up the
backlog I've accumulated on this Flash Embed thread, so my sends may
seem
to arrive out of a time warp.
Oh yeah, I'm on Safari
Rimantas -
I'm hoping that, along with classitis and divitis, you are not also
excluding gedraitis.
Yrs, Albert
--
On Sep 23, 2004, at 8:26 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
And yes, validation beauty is only skin deep. I will
Boy, do I feel sheepish. I get all caught up in ID's and side panels
and what not...and the answer is as simple as...well...it's simple. A
BODY background. Just a BODY background. (memo to myself...Keep It
Simple Stupid).
Thanks for not laughing... ;)
~john
_
Dr.
To the many members of WSG:
This is my second post on this same subject, and I'm hoping that this
time I'll be able to get a response.
:-) I have built up a design in Photoshop, which you
can view here
or here.
I'm looking to get help on how I should write up the structure for the
site, as
you forgot the charset:
meta http-equiv=Content-type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 /
otherwise looks fine
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
I'm just started working on my third table-free website and I'm trying
to pay attention to standards but I'm stumped by a couple of spacing
details and would appreciate some help.
See www.zebragraphics.co.uk/ragamuffin. CSS is at
www.zebragraphics.co.uk/ragamuffin/styles/main.css
First, I
Hello, Group.
I have a curious problem. I am creating this site with CSS tabs, and
making it so that the tab is on while visiting that page. Well, it
works in Firefox just fine, but in IE it's not...when on the server.
When viewing it on the local drive, it looks good.
G'day
First, I have extra space above and below the banner image - I just want
10px space,
The banner image sits inside a paragraph. Paragraphs have margins, unless
you set them to zero in your css. Easiest fix is to lose the paragraph - the
image can go directly in the div.
Second, I've
Thats a bug of IE.
I use to apply this css hack to fix some bugs of IE
Ex.
div#nameofyourdiv
{
here... put the propreties that ALL the other browsers recognizes..
}
* html body div#nameofyourdiv
{
put here the properties that only IE will recognize.
}
Genau Lopes Júnior
WebDesigner
Title: RE: [WSG] Unwanted extra space
Hi Mary
You have a padding of 10px in the banner div. Also Padding 10px in the navcontainer div. Try altering the padding rule for the navcontainer to:
padding: 0 10px;
if this doesn't shrink the whitespace enough, try the same rule in the banner div
Hi, I have some questions about slicing in photoshop.
First of all, I noticed that when I slice and save it with the css
settings instead of tables, photoshop uses the x and the y axis thingy
to put the layout in order which means everyhting cannot move ... I
wanted to know how to center the
To move your sliced images to another place on the page, place all the
stuff ImageReady (Photoshop) generates inside another div !--
generated slices here --/div, give the enclosing division position:
relative and control its position on the page as you wish.
I don't understand your question
I am working on my second CSS XHTML site.
Home page thus far: http://sonze.com/lange/index.html
CSS for the page: http://sonze.com/lange/css/master.css
I have some empty div tags to be able to make a graphic a background
image since this presentation is common to all pages.
For example in my
Hello everyone,
Does anybody know how to prevent the flash of (CSS)unstyled
content that appears when a page is loading and the browser is
yet to download and apply the stylesheet to the web page?
I know I read about a technique for preventing this somewhere
(maybe o on this list) but I can't
Hi Shane,
Well, I don't know if it is okay but I've done it on more than one occasion.
I have noticed that Internet explorer puts a nasty margin on empty divs,
that might be something to watch out for.
J
Shane Helm wrote:
I am working on my second CSS XHTML site.
Home page thus far:
Thanks John.
Is there anyway to avoid the IE nasty margin. Should I put something
in the div to avoid it? Would nbsp or a transparent gif or something
help? How have you avoided the problem?
Thanks for your time,
Shane
On Sep 29, 2004, at 12:55 PM, John Oxton wrote:
Hi Shane,
Well, I don't
knowing the name of the problem is half-way to finding a solution already...
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22flash+of+unstyled+content%22
Patrick
David wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anybody know how to prevent the flash of (CSS)unstyled
content that appears when a page is loading and the browser
At 11:35 AM 9/29/2004, Shane Helm wrote:
I have some empty div tags to be able to make a graphic a background image
since this presentation is common to all pages.
For example in my html:
div id=header3/div
My CSS for header3 is as follows:
#header3
{
position: relative;
http://www.bluerobot.com/web/css/fouc.asp
David wrote:
Does anybody know how to prevent the flash of (CSS)unstyled
content that appears when a page is loading and the browser is
yet to download and apply the stylesheet to the web page?
**
The
Hi there group of gurus and list lurkers.
What's the best way to fomat a skip navigation link at the top of a
page so it doesn't appear in modern/styled browsers, but is still
accessible to small-screen / mobile platforms and reduced-ability
environments (screen readers and the like)?
I've seen
hi
on a side note, I was in an accessibility seminar and they suggested using the term
skip to main content because it sounds the best when vocalized by a screen reader.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Brian Duchek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 2:11 PM
To:
personally i wouldnt use the H1 for your jezzjournal i would call that
something else like logo div or whatever and use the H1 for the title
of the post so that the h1 is not the same on every page. Otherwise you
have set it up almost exactly the way i would do it...
jackie
Could someone please explain what I can and can't do with a PNG image in IE
Windows? I have a logo with a soft drop shadow that works everywhere except
IE Win. In IE, there is a gray box that where the transparency should be. So
I tried one with a solid drop shadow and the transparent part of the
I like to use the H1 for image replacement and change the h1 tag for search engine
optimized words that are still appropriate for those with the style sheet turned off.
So, I agree with the first setup.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Jackie Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Brian What's the best way to fomat a skip navigation link at the top of a
Brian page so it doesn't appear in modern/styled browsers, but is still
Brian accessible to small-screen / mobile platforms and reduced-ability
Brian environments (screen readers and the like)?
Hi Brian
Another way of
Thanks Paul.
I haven't defined my h1-h6 styles yet just because I haven't gotten
that far yet, but I will. I can change my header3 id to something
more semantic. I currently was just using it to define a background
image that needs no image replacement because it is not an actual text
My understanding is that while IE Win supports the display of PNG files, it
doesn't support any of their transparency features. If you want to use
transparency for images in a cross-browser safe way, GIF is really your only
option. I wouldn't be holding my breath for IE to catch up either ...
http://9rules.com/whitespace/css_redesigns/yahoo_css_redesign.php
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in
Is there a way to make a check box and radio button print with an empty box instead of
a filled, black box?
Here's a page with an example:
http://v4.csatravelprotection.com/csa/packinglist.do
I tried adding this to the print style sheet
checkbox {background-color:#fff !important;}
but it didn't
On 9/28/04 7:08 PM Ryan Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
AOL browser is uses the IE engine, does it not?
Yes. Most home users using Windows would still be using the IE driven
version of the AOL browser (not sure about Mac). One thing worth
considering when developing for AOL is the
Kevin Futter wrote:
My understanding is that while IE Win supports the display of PNG files, it
doesn't support any of their transparency features. If you want to use
transparency for images in a cross-browser safe way, GIF is really your only
option. I wouldn't be holding my breath for IE to
WaSP reckons its unlikely, or the product of hallucinogenic substances:
http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2004_09.html#a000446 8P
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greer, Ben
Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2004 11:24 AM
To:
On my Safari 1.2.3, I see no problem. A good frontpage, but didn't
delve deeper.
Regards, Albert
--
Imagination is more important than knowledge. - Einstein
-
On Sep 27, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Kim Kruse wrote:
Hi,
On this page http://www.mouseriders.dk/kontakt.php (and the other
Nick Lo wrote:
http://9rules.com/whitespace/css_redesigns/yahoo_css_redesign.php
Good writeup- but I must say yahoo has done a horid job so far.
HTML Errors: 223
The css validates, but it is horrid.
in 2 days, how could one ever remember what #v or where#v #v4.h appears
in the document?
IMO,
Second, I want to know what the default layout settings, the width is.
I sometimes try 800*600 but I hate it because it is too small and
wanted to know what the default if for people with 1024*768 or
whatever it is...
I'm assuming you are asking what the best default monitor resolution you
are
Tim Shortt wrote:
You have to actually test on an AOL
account to really see any affect of this (or any other) behavior (versus
just running a local AOL browser, which I did for years).
If you're really, really committed (or just masochistic) to testing it,
but want to avoid having to actually
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Good writeup- but I must say yahoo has done a horid job so far.
HTML Errors: 223
The css validates, but it is horrid.
in 2 days, how could one ever remember what #v or where#v #v4.h appears
in the document?
IMO, they need to get some developers in there who actually know
John,
1. You've got your selectors a bit mixed up, they should be:
#tabmenu .active a { ... } and
#tabmenu .active a:link { ... } etc
instead of
#tabmenu a.active { ... } and
#tabmenu a.active:link { ... } etc
Then, the border and background for #tabmenu a.active:link is overriding the
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
If you're really, really committed (or just masochistic) to testing it,
but want to avoid having to actually get an AOL account, you can also
run your own server http://www.aolserver.com/ and do testing on your
local setup under true battle conditions...either that, or
I agree it appears that way now but I think it's a little too
easy/early to suggest it is and will end up that way. In that respect
it'll be interesting to watch it develop.
On a site of this massive scale I'd be very surprised if there are not
a bunch of pretty screwed on heads knocking
Cesar -
Web users interested in your services will not be able to get much help
if their browser is Safari 1.2.3. Sorry, but on this browser your
site is
a mess. Maybe someone else on the list can advise you what to do to
make it Safari-accessible.
Yours, Albert
Thanks for pointing out the issues I was having. I have made the
suggested changes and really appreciated the time y'all took to look
at the site and suggest a solution.
Thanks again - Susan
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:05:05 +, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Susan
I'd suggest
Darren Wood wrote:
I think you're missing the point...agreed the code is well shoddy,
but, as Scrivs says, this is a major step forward for the web. If the
best/most popular site on the web is tableless and moving towards
complete web standards, then it becomes very easy for us to sell
46 matches
Mail list logo
