RE: [WSG] Avoiding the evil br

2005-10-10 Thread Peter Williams
From: Jon Tan I think that for any agent the semantic way to separate address lines would be using a comma at the end of each line as appropriate, which regardless of what mark-up was used would be interpreted correctly by screen readers. Doesn't this also apply to non-CSS agents

Re: *****SPAM***** Re: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Richard Czeiger wrote: Umm actually you do.. Check out www.courtappearances.com.au to see what I'm talking about. Here's the CSS for that: http://www.courtappearances.com.au/styles/style.css As soon as I read ...you do I knew what hook you were using ;) It's *very* nice ;) Thierry |

Re: [WSG] Avoiding the evil br

2005-10-10 Thread Hope Stewart
On 10/10/05 3:38 PM, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Read this aloud: 909 anystreet ithaca, new york Did you stop at the line break? Did it matter? My point is that we don't need to make the line break obvious to the screen reader. For this address it doesn't matter, but for

Re: [WSG] Avoiding the evil br

2005-10-10 Thread Buddy Quaid
Usually when telling someone an address your giving it to them as information which they either have to write down or type in. The pause is usually to let them write it down before you go any further. I wonder if there is a way to make the screen reader say what you want it to say for

[WSG] DW 8 standards

2005-10-10 Thread Jad Madi
Hi, is there any good reviews of Dreamweaver 8 and web standards? do you recommend using it to achieve standards compliant sites? any advantages/disadvantages? Thanks in advance. -- Regards Jad madi Blog http://EasyHTTP.com/jad/ Web standards Planet http://W3planet.net/

RE: [WSG] DW 8 standards

2005-10-10 Thread Patrick Lauke
Jad Madi is there any good reviews of Dreamweaver 8 and web standards? do you recommend using it to achieve standards compliant sites? any advantages/disadvantages? Apparently it's quite good. I'd recommend having a look at http://www.sitepoint.com/article/dreamweaver-8-standards (and the

RE: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Townson, Chris
I know we live in commercial, capitalist times ;) ... however, I cannot agree that a company logo is page content (that warrants a presence in the HTML) in the true sense: a logo is essentially 'indexical': it depends for its meaning upon some other entity (the company) and the context within

RE: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Patrick Lauke
Townson, Chris b) You always have a sensible H1 for which all H2s are genuine subheadings. and what, h1img src=logo.jpg alt=Company name //h1 is not genuine? Patrick __ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford

[WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Vicki Berry
Russ wrote: Derek Featherstone has posted his accessibility presentation from WE05 at a new site - Simply Accessible http://simplyaccessible.org/ I've just gotta say... this is fantastic. As someone to whom the podcasts are pretty much inaccessible (because I am stuck with dial-up and also I

RE: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Townson, Chris
Chris Townson wrote: b) You always have a sensible H1 for which all H2s are genuine subheadings. Patrick H. Lauke wrote and what, h1img src=logo.jpg alt=Company name //h1 is not genuine? Semantically, I would say: No, its not This would be due to the point about indexicality I mentioned.

Re: [WSG] Say no to CSS hacks with branching techniques

2005-10-10 Thread Al Sparber
From: James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] One of the functions of this list and group is to implement best practices using W3C standards based development. These conditionals you talk about are a Microsoft addition to workaround bugs in their software (what happened to fixing the bugs?), like

RE: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Patrick Lauke
Townson, Chris This would be due to the point about indexicality I mentioned. This would be the point where I'd say the whole discussion on semantics risks disappearing up it own behind...no offense. You want to do web design, eh? Well, get onto the semiotics and linguistics course for the

Re: [WSG] Say no to CSS hacks with branching techniques

2005-10-10 Thread Michael Allan
James, I can see where you're coming from, and I'm all for the programming purity you're advocating, but I want to stick my hand up in support of Thierry's position here. In fact, I was in the process of assembling all these filters myself when he posted his link to this list, so I'm

[WSG] Link underlines in MSIE

2005-10-10 Thread Mary Wright
Hi, I'm starting a new website and have a border-bottom style on the a:hover menu links. It works perfectly in Safari but doesn't show up at all in MSIE on the PC. Would a kind person take a look and tell me where I'm going wrong? The page is at www.zebragraphics.co.uk/porge, css at

RE: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Townson, Chris
This would be due to the point about indexicality I mentioned. This would be the point where I'd say the whole discussion on semantics risks disappearing up it own behind...no offense. none taken :D You want to do web design, eh? Well, get onto the semiotics and linguistics course for the

Re: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
... QED: Use image replacement for logos (over h1 heading) where possible! ... I'd say, where necessary... I gradually arrived at this: Logo is important visual/id/navigation element of the page, so I have it in the html as IMG. It is not header of any kind (imho, no need to argue), so it is

RE: [WSG] Link underlines in MSIE

2005-10-10 Thread Graham Cook
You need to change your navlist a as follows #navlist a { text-align: left; margin-right: 10px; display:block; float:left; } Graham Cook UA Oz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Wright Sent: Monday, 10 October 2005 11:41 PM To:

Re: [WSG] DW 8 standards

2005-10-10 Thread Buddy Quaid
As an avid user of Dreamweaver everyday, I can tell you that Dreamweaver is great for compliant sites. It has a lot of built in tools like a validator that validates to the spec of your current DTD. Also closes tags according to the dtd chosen. It has not only xhtml validator but also 508

RE: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Patrick Lauke
Townson, Chris I agree with your point here completely. However, in pragmatic (;)) terms, with current technology, text is just the only solution which conveys meaning to _all_ users (not just those using graphical browsers on a desktop PC) The only problem with having an image of a

Re: [WSG] Link underlines in MSIE

2005-10-10 Thread Mary Wright
Thanks for your help, Graham. The border-bottom rules appear now, but the logo has disappeared and the banner image jumps when I mouse over the links. Any ideas? Mary On 10 Oct 2005, at 15:23, Graham Cook wrote: You need to change your navlist a as follows #navlist a { text-align: left;

Re: [WSG] Link underlines in MSIE - amended

2005-10-10 Thread Mary Wright
Ah, the logo has appeared again now. Image is still jumping, tho'. Mary On 10 Oct 2005, at 15:23, Graham Cook wrote: You need to change your navlist a as follows #navlist a { text-align: left; margin-right: 10px; display:block; float:left; } Graham Cook UA Oz -Original

RE: [WSG] Link underlines in MSIE - amended

2005-10-10 Thread Peter Goddard
Mary Do you have a border on the a:link element? I think the bouncing is because all the link styles should have bottom border (even if the color is transparent) although a pale gray would look nice, which goes darker on rollover. #navlist a { text-align: left; margin-right:

Re: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Julián Landerreche
Rimantas Liubertas wrote: H1, which is spared for more appropriate usage — i.e. main header of the page - About us, Products, etc. So, wich tag would you use to put your company/site name if you use H1 to mark-up the section name? OK. the site name can be in the title tag, but I think

Re: [WSG] Placement of company logo

2005-10-10 Thread Thierry Koblentz
adam reitsma wrote: oh dear is it just me, or does this TIP method seem like the modern-day version of the spacer gif? There is more to the spacer image... About the hook: An image element can be printed (good thing for a logo) and can even scale. About hiding the text: Unlike Richard's

Re: [WSG] site check: liquid.rdpdesign.com

2005-10-10 Thread Steve Ferguson
Nice! I wish I had thought of scaling screenshots to percent width, it looks better and would have saved me a lot of trouble.When I view the site using Safari it briefly renders the unstyled page. I haven't noticed this behavior before. Perhaps it's the @import?Steve Ferguson -

Re: [WSG] DW 8 standards

2005-10-10 Thread Terrence Wood
Buddy Quaid said: As an avid user of Dreamweaver everyday, I can tell you that Dreamweaver is great for compliant sites. It has a lot of built in tools like a validator that validates to the spec of your current DTD. Are you talking about DW8? DWMX 2004 does not validate HTML 4, it uses it's

Re: [WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Terrence Wood
Vicki Berry said: I've just gotta say... this is fantastic. Derek, can you update your examoples to use fieldsets instead of divs to group the form controls together? kind regards Terrence Wood. ** The discussion list for

[WSG] off-topic: RSS Feeders

2005-10-10 Thread Drake, Ted C.
Hi All Sorry about this off-topic post and you can certainly reply off line to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I am behind the learning curve with RSS aggregators and would like to know if someone could recommend a good desktop RSS application that would also tie in with ipod or cell phones

Re: [WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Derek Featherstone
On 10/11/05, Terrence Wood wrote: Derek, can you update your examoples to use fieldsets instead of divs to group the form controls together? I do use fieldsets to group form controls together but in most cases, there is one fieldset around all the items in one form - the divs are there to

Re: [WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Terrence Wood
Derek Featherstone said: the divs are there to provide additional style hooks[...] to create rows without using tables. You have not misinterpeted what I was saying, sorry my email is a little terse today.I would've have emailed you off-list but couldn't find your email anywhere (within my 3

RE: [WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Drake, Ted C.
Hi Terrance A fieldset should contain a set of similar inputs, such as the users personal information, a fieldset for creditcard information, shipping address, etc. It would defeat the coordinating purpose to use a fieldset randomly to create rows or columns. That said, you could set a width

Re: [WSG] site check: liquid.rdpdesign.com

2005-10-10 Thread Christian Montoya
On 10/10/05, Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice! I wish I had thought of scaling screenshots to percent width, it looks better and would have saved me a lot of trouble. When I view the site using Safari it briefly renders the unstyled page. I haven't noticed this behavior before. Perhaps

RE: [WSG] site check: liquid.rdpdesign.com

2005-10-10 Thread Paul Bennett
FOUC? an empty script tag will do it, ie: script type=text/javascript/script (after the styles are imported / included iirc...) Paul ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

RE: [WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Terrence Wood
Drake, Ted C. said: A fieldset should contain a set of similar inputs[...] It would defeat the coordinating purpose to use a fieldset randomly to create rows or columns. Agreed, you are absolutely correct. Doh! I didn't acutally check the source code, no wonder my earlier post was confusing.

Re: [WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Terrence Wood wrote: If anyone *is* interested in replicating Dereks layout without the extra div's try this: label for=unameUsername emmust not contain spaces/em input id=uname type=text name=uname value= / /label I'd prefer to go with explicit labeling rather than implicit labeling, but

RE: [WSG] simplyaccessible.org

2005-10-10 Thread Derek Featherstone
On 10/11/05, Terrence Wood wrote: Agreed, you are absolutely correct. Doh! I didn't acutally check the source code, no wonder my earlier post was confusing. Sorry Derek. No worries... If anyone *is* interested in replicating Dereks layout without the extra div's try this: snip / for what

[WSG] Safari FOUC was site check: liquid.rdpdesign.com

2005-10-10 Thread Lea de Groot
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:45:07 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote: Sounds like FOUC. I'll try to fix that... eventually. Thanks. Well, if you succeed, do publicise it! I haven't yet managed to kill the Safari FOUC :( warmly, Lea -- Lea de Groot Elysian Systems - http://elysiansystems.com/ Brisbane,

Re: [WSG] :after/:before used for layout

2005-10-10 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Zach Inglis wrote: I wanted to know your opinion on my post http://www.zachinglis.com/ websites/website/before-sliding-doors/. Interesting. I've been playing with :after lately, although not for anything serious. I've had some problems with positioning in Gecko. Opera is doing fine. Would be

[WSG] IE BG Image Bug

2005-10-10 Thread Stuart Sherwood
One of my sites is triggering a bug in IE where a background image loads and displays perfectly but dissapears after it has scrolled of the page. If you scroll all the way to the bottom and then return to the top of the page, the bg image is no longer there. Any idea what this bug is?

[WSG] Firefox caption madness

2005-10-10 Thread Jake Badger
I'm getting a weird problem when I try and absolutely position something in a table caption. It all works fine in IE, but in Firefox if I try the page below the caption is only as wide as the first cell in the table. If I remove the display:block; on the caption then the caption is the full width