that no browser in common
use handles due to their lack of SGML parsing.
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
- for
example like this:
form div input
It's a question of direct parent, not ancestor.
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
browser to pass it.
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
.
- Dynamic elements:
Things such as being logged in/not logged in, having Google Desktop or
not, sponsored links, search listings etc. all need be take in
consideration.
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com
liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
On 11/01/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
liorean wrote:
Character references refer to Unicode code points independent of the
document encoding and character set. At least for HTML4 and XML, if
not for HTML3.2.
As far as character references in HTML are concerned, they have
for large size.
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
or
behavioral hints exists explicitly in the document, because the
defaults on not-strictly-semantical aspects are also part of the
semantic sets (In my view, at least. Which isn't neccesarily canon...)
Counter arguments against it I think I've already mentioned.
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http
message without any trimming...
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
will realise the risk of confusion and
make the next release ie7b3, but I wouldn't count on that.
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
it is either
whitelisted or otherwise excluded from the autoresponder. See
uri:http://web-graphics.com/mtarchive/001730.php
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
attribute is required on form controls but
not on form functionality. The DTD format doesn't allow this type of
granularity however.
In other words, just because something is valid according to the HTML
DTD doesn't mean it's valid according to the HTML specification.
--
David liorean Andersson
elements (i.e. all type attribute values other than reset and
submit, including the value button, entirely independent of whether
the form control may be successful or not).
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http
been doing some work on trying to present syntax-semantics
in a way that lends itself to a SUCCESS/FAILURE/CRASH/PEG result on
each feature, but that's trickier...
If anyone is interested in helping me writing test cases for that
testsuite, just send me a mail.
--
David liorean Andersson
://liorean.net/xhtmllayout.xhtml
All of them are valid documents and except for DOCTYPE, XML prologue
and XHTML namespace the document they describe is identical.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http
On 29/05/07, Alastair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/07, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems strange that the closing slash is
taken as the close, rather than the greater than sign, is that in the
HTML spec somewhere?
Yes, in the SGML declaration.
Which someone linked
of that.
Coming to JS from a back-end developer perspective I find this very strange.
The perspective difference is quite a lot of the reason, I feel.
Different considerations give different behaviour.
--
David liorean Andersson
say.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
are deprecated in HTML4.01 but
really ought not be since they convey semantics that are inherent to
the document structure and aren't purely presentational. It's likely
they will be un-deprecated in HTML5.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List
a dependency of that code on the bug in
question, than fixing the bug? If such dependencies are created, they
make it harder to actually fix bugs.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
.
3. And maybe last, E4X.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
-expression curlies-and-semicolons, it has object orientation
and higher order programming features, it has reified closures and
lexical scope with a few dynamic scope features etc. It's a hybrid
language. But it does have object orientation.
--
David liorean Andersson
keyed arrays of fixed size. In
fact, true arrays are only available in JavaScript in the form of
strings, and those are read only.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
signatures connected with the type system but that
does not allow code inheritance.
Some have only this and no implementation inheritance mechanism.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
2008/10/24 Anthony Ziebell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Forgot to clarify one thing: ECMAScript is fully OO in my opinion, however
JavaScript is not a full implementation of ECMAScript, unfortunately.
liorean wrote:
JavaScript is a superset of ECMAScript. If ECMAScript is opbject
oriented, so
. But they use classical inheritance, and
because JavaScript does not some people have got into their heads that
Classical inheritance == OOP which means JavaScritp != OOP. But that's
a misconception.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List
to find tutorials or articles about
separate areas of JavaScript:
uri:http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/javascript.html
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
.
Anthony Ziebell is arguing that it's not object oriented based on the
false premise that classical inheritance is the way to achieve object
orientation and prototypal inheritance is not, despite himself linking
articles stating the contrary.
--
David liorean Andersson
2008/10/27 liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The first implementation of JavaScript is still alive in the form of
Mozilla SpiredMonkey
Or SpiderMonkey, as it is properly called :)
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http
think I'm
missrepresenting you at all when I say you've argued against that
point.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
or for built in
operators.
You're still not getting around that there's no built in support for
classical inheritance, other than the pseudo-classes that are used in
the ECMAScript spec internally but not for language for us users.
--
David liorean Andersson
JavaScript additions to ECMAScript.
The name JavaScript is very seldom used by Microsoft. If you read
Microsoft employee blogs and official statements, you almost never
encounter that term. They prefer to either use their own JScript name
or the ECMAScript name.
--
David liorean Andersson
2008/10/28 liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, it's a registred trademark of Sun,
Actually a Trademark, not a Registred Trademark, apparently.
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
liorean wrote:
(Netscape had originally intended to use the name LiveScript.)
2008/10/28 Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Actually, it was initially released as LiveScript and renamed later.
IIRC Navigator 2.0 also supported a mocha: pseudo-protocol like the
javascript: pseudo-protocol we
/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference
[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Guide
--
David liorean Andersson
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
39 matches
Mail list logo
