On 13 Jan 2010, at 04:02, c...@fagandesign.com.au wrote:
Now, this Accessibility Appendix lists CSS validation (point 3) as a required
attribute for compliance.
No, it doesn't. The document says, under conformance:
Conformance Level Triple-A: all Priority 1, 2, and 3 checkpoints
Christian,
You said you've been told to place IE specific rules in a separate
sheet, but you don't mention why you haven't done so.
In the example you provided, I'd do this:
1) move zoom: 1 to your IE6 rule (and to IE7 rule if necessary)
2) place the IE6 and IE7 rules in an IE ONLY sheet
3)
recommended when they introduced
IE7 and there's not a strong reason to avoid it.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Stone
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:26 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA
In the example you provided, I'd do this:
1) move zoom: 1 to your IE6 rule (and to IE7 rule if necessary)
2) place the IE6 and IE7 rules in an IE ONLY sheet
3) use a conditional comment to call the IE sheet
Would that work? If so, please explain your reasons for not doing so.
Here are
Nick
Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and separate style
sheet.
It's a valid rule that basically says show the screen at 100%. A user style
sheet
can still over-ride this rule. It's an easy way to add hasLayout without
causing
other issues.
This is what
U.S. House of Representatives
http://www.house.gov
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of David Dorward
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:46 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility
Quoting Nick Stone boa...@nick-stone.com:
Christian,
You said you've been told to place IE specific rules in a separate
sheet, but you don't mention why you haven't done so.
Would that work? If so, please explain your reasons for not doing so.
C) facilitates site maintenance (easy to find
On 13 Jan 2010, at 21:30, Chabot, Elliot wrote:
The requirement for validation in WCAG 1.0 is contained in checkpoint 3.2,
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-identify-grammar.
Err, yes. As I said (and you quoted!):
Checkpoint 3.2 says Create documents that validate to
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's a valid rule that basically says show
the screen at 100%. A user style sheet can still over-ride this
rule. It's an easy way to add hasLayout without causing
] On
Behalf Of David Hucklesby
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's
Hucklesby
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's a valid rule
] On
Behalf Of David Hucklesby
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's
] On
Behalf Of David Hucklesby
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's
] On
Behalf Of David Hucklesby
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's
] On
Behalf Of David Hucklesby
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's
Of Chabot, Elliot
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
The requirement for validation in WCAG 1.0 is contained in checkpoint 3.2,
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-identify-grammar
http://www.w3.org
] On
Behalf Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received
11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted
] On
Behalf Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received
11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted
] On
Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:03 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
In the example you provided, I'd do this:
1) move zoom: 1 to your IE6 rule (and to IE7 rule if necessary)
2) place the IE6 and IE7 rules
] On
Behalf Of Nick Stone
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:26 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Christian,
You said you've been told to place IE specific rules in a separate
sheet, but you don't mention why you haven't done so
Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received
11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted by the same Group
] On
Behalf Of c...@fagandesign.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:53 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Quoting Nick Stone boa...@nick-stone.com:
Christian,
You said you've been told to place IE specific rules in a separate
] On
Behalf Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received
11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted
, Elliot
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
The requirement for validation in WCAG 1.0 is contained in checkpoint 3.2,
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-identify-grammar
http://www.w3.org/TR
] On
Behalf Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received
11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted
] On
Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 3:25 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Nick
Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and separate
style sheet.
It's a valid rule that basically says show
] On
Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:54 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Nick
Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and separate style
sheet.
It's a valid rule that basically says show the screen
Hi David,
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's a valid rule that basically says show
the screen at 100%. A user style sheet can still over-ride this
rule. It's an easy way to add hasLayout
Dorward
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 6:25 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
On 13 Jan 2010, at 21:30, Chabot, Elliot wrote:
The requirement for validation in WCAG 1.0 is contained in checkpoint 3.2,
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai
] On
Behalf Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received
11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted
_
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed
] On
Behalf Of Houstin R. Hutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation
Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received
11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted
From: c...@fagandesign.com.au
I guess my question is: Do IE-related CSS hacks cause a document to
fail AAA (or A/AA for that matter) Accessibility compliance?
Hi Christian,
If you mean things like zoom or even proprietary -Moz or
From: c...@fagandesign.com.au
I guess my question is: Do IE-related CSS hacks cause a document to
fail AAA (or A/AA for that matter) Accessibility compliance?
Hi Christian,
If you mean things like zoom or even proprietary -Moz or
34 matches
Mail list logo
