On 6 Mar 2004, at 20:44, russ weakley wrote:
Here are some other online accessibility tools:
snip
.. and if I may be so bold, you might find some of these useful (and
there's a pop-up window generator there too):
http://www.accessify.com/tools-and-wizards/default.asp
Ian Lloyd
On 6 Mar 2004, at 21:44, Martin Chapman wrote:
I was finding it bit daunting, since the site I am re-coding is based
on ASP.NET, and as I am sure many of you know... Microsoft + ASP.NET +
web = 666
Reall, what we need is a book that explains how to achieve acceptable
levels of
On 7 Mar 2004, at 12:40, Peter Firminger wrote:
Having said that, something like:
a href=copyright.htm onClick=window.open('',
'copyright','toolbar=0,location=0,directories=0,status=0,menubar=0,scro
llbar
s=auto,resizable=0,width=310,height=300') target=copyright
will still work ok as the
://www.sodesires.com
~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 03/07/04 16:33:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Bobby question
My next question is for e.g. using the style switcher js from ALA, or whichever js written by programmers for your
With Regards
Jaime Wong
~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 03/07/04 20:11:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Bobby question
Hi Jaime,
A noscript tag is read only when _javascript_ isn'
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Bobby question
Thanks Peter for the wonderful explanation :)
I tested it straight away but facing some problem with Strict DTD.
This is what I have in my html
script type=text/javascript
var d=new Date();
yr=d.getFullYear();
if (yr!=2003)
document.write(- +yr
Hi Justin Martin!
Sorry about the previous post, it should have been addressed to Martin not to
Justin, but it may be interesting for anyone who is thinking of buying the Bobby CD.
Guess it's just too early here in the UK.
Apologies again, JG
--- Justin French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Sorry if this is such a dumb question that it displays more of my ignorance
than anything else, but this is the second time in the last few weeks I've
heard references to Bobby, but
Who the hell is Bobby? And what does he have to do with us?
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP
Hi Michael, hope this helps you.
Bobby will allow you to test web pages and help expose and repair barriers to
accessibility and encourage compliance with existing accessibility guidelines, such as
Section 508 and the W3C's WCAG.
View this at -
bobby. Bad tool.
P
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 8:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Bobby question
Sorry if this is such a dumb question that it displays more
of my ignorance
than anything else
Michael,
There are other accessibility tools that have better reputations than Bobby
now. Bobby has received growing criticism over the last few years - here is
an example:
http://www.evolt.org/article/Why_Bobby_Approved_is_not_Enough/4090/9278/inde
x.html?format=print
Here are some other online
Thanks everyone. I'll certainly check those alternatives out, thanks
Russ.
I was finding it bit daunting, since the site I am re-coding is based
on ASP.NET, and as I am sure many of you know... Microsoft + ASP.NET +
web = 666. The client doesn't really know what they want from the
Hi Martin,
I'm not familiar with this at all. How much of this example would be
auto-generated? One would assume that a lot of it could be fixed by putting
things in the right place (scripts in the head section and adding a
doctype).
http://www.add2web.dk/aspdatagrid/Sample/default.asp
P
Regarding accreditation, I reckon the best place to start is the Web
Accessibility Initiative (WAI) which produces (amongst other things) Web
Content Accessibility Guidelines.
These guidelines have include the all-important checkpoints that are broken
into three priorities. Ideally, web
Thanks once again Russ... will take great care in reading those sites
you've suggested. Did I mention I'm 3/4 throught the project :oO ;o)
And, there is always this list if you get stuck. I am sure that there
are
accessibility experts lurking in our ranks that could help out if
detailed
PROTECTED]
Date: 03/06/04 20:07:24
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] Bobby question
Regarding accreditation, I reckon the best place to start is the Web
Accessibility Initiative (WAI) which produces (amongst other things) Web
Content Accessibility Guidelines.
These guidelines have include
Hi Jaime,
Yes it's very important. Many differently-abled people don't use a mouse.
They use the keyboard to navigate around a page/site (generally much faster
and more efficiently than any mouse user). By using onclick or onmousedown
etc. you may be blocking their access to whatever the resource
On Saturday, March 6, 2004, at 11:28 AM, Martin Chapman wrote:
Just a quick question regarding the Bobby accessibility site. I am
currently working on a site to convert to standards/validation specs.
However, 99% of the site is user/password protected. I get round W3C
validating the protected
18 matches
Mail list logo
