me is minimal.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of David Dixon
Sent: 26 January 2009 22:50
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Users who deliberately disable JavaScript
Again, can you show
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Users who deliberately disable JavaScript
Again, can you show that the small decline in IE's market share has
contributed to users blocking Javascript or using specific Firefox
extensions?
IE has had plugins such as the Web Accessibility Toolbar etc for some
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Users who deliberately disable JavaScript
Again, can you show that the small decline in IE's market share has
contributed to users blocking Javascript or using specific Firefox
extensions?
IE has had plugins such as the Web Accessibility Toolbar etc
2009/1/27 Patrick H. Lauke re...@splintered.co.uk:
As good as it is to hear anecdotal evidence from expert users such as list
members here, I'd say it's much more important to bring some actual live
user stats to the table.
Last time I checked JS stats (around 12 months ago) at the site I work
Our small county site has about 297k visitors last year and about 1.9%
(5,700) had Javascript disabled according to SuperStats.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 14:33, Jessica Enders jess...@formulate.com.auwrote:
Hi Pascal
In the JavaScript/Accessibility/form validation discussion you mention the
Given the increased number of threats and the availability of slick
script blocker extensions for Firefox like NoScript
(http://noscript.net/) it's only going to get more common, particularly
among security conscious people. I certainly use it, only enabling
Javascript for a site I'm visiting when
I have JS disabled, and only enable it for sites which I decide I need
it working.
Due to the way I work, I often have hundreds of browser tabs open
and I can leave them open for weeks with JS off.
I also find it educational to see which sites have non-functional forms
because they have used JS
_javascript_ should be implemented only to supplement
/ layer existing functionality. Your site should operate just fine
without it... There are always exceptions to this rule however you
shouldn't let _javascript_ dictate how you code.
Thanks,
Anthony.
Sven Dowideit wrote:
I have JS
David Lane wrote:
Given the increased number of threats and the availability of slick
script blocker extensions for Firefox like NoScript
(http://noscript.net/) it's only going to get more common, particularly
among security conscious people. I certainly use it, only enabling
Javascript for a
Hello Patrick,
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 21:55 +, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
David Lane wrote:
Given the increased number of threats and the availability of slick
script blocker extensions for Firefox like NoScript
(http://noscript.net/) it's only going to get more common, particularly
Agreed, if people have real long term usage statistics that they can
share to support the claim that Javascript use is in decline, and not
focus on very one-sided arguments of personal use or everyone i know
then I'd be interested to hear. Until that time, or my own analysis
supports these
Again, can you show that the small decline in IE's market share has
contributed to users blocking Javascript or using specific Firefox
extensions?
IE has had plugins such as the Web Accessibility Toolbar etc for some
years now that allow disabling of Javascript very easily, so why would
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
