I have two receivers, one on the left channel and one on the right of my
Tascam. I can select which RX feeds an instance of WSTX with the pavu split
volume sliders. I can monitor FT modes on two bands at once easily with this
setup. It takes all of about three seconds to switch TX to one or
Hi Andy,
On mu Kubuntu machine the TX stream only shows up in the PulseAudio volume
control utility when actually transmitting. An interesting quirk over multiple
versions of Kubuntu is that I have to select different "paths" for TX and RX
audio, i.e. one to a pulse device and the other to
Thank you sir! Compiled and installed successfully.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:43:05 -0400
Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Multiple reports of the same issue are not really necessary, especially
> after one of us in the development group has already responded.
>
> Anyway,
Confirmed same error, Kubuntu 22.04 up to date as of today.
Error: Symbol ‘ncand‘ at (1) is USE associated from module ‘q65‘ and cannot
occur in COMMON
/home/nu0c/src/build/build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:93:3:
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:59:57 +
Stan Gammons
This comment absolutely needs to be pinned! Or at least put in page 1 of the
user guide.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:33:05 -0500
Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> That logic is you, the operator. WSJT-X has many operator aids. It is
> not an operator replacement.
>
> --
I would agree to that. I saw one with a P7 call yesterday that looked quite
legitimate. My finger wanted badly to click on it but I said "no, wait...".
Never saw it again. Despite what the nay-sayers claim, FT modes do require some
human thought to get the best out of them. :)
73
-Jim
NU0C
I actually see RRR fairly often. In many cases I think it is newbies who have
not read the manual.
The thing that puzzles me a bit is that occasionally I will work an op who
sends RR73 and then after my 73 he also sends a 73. At that point it starts to
feel a little like a Alphonse and
You CQ DX message should be in TX6.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 19:33:18 +
Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote:
> After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use of
> F/H mode. I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto sequenced
> after RR73 was
:
> On 14.5.2023 18.15, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel wrote:
> > Thanks Kari. That sounds like a viable option. Can you tell me how you did
> > that? I'm not a code warrior. I am an old DOS/Windows guy. I can follow
> > good instructions and do some logical troubleshooting but I'm
wrote:
> On 14.5.2023 18.15, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel wrote:
> > Thanks Kari. That sounds like a viable option. Can you tell me how you did
> > that? I'm not a code warrior. I am an old DOS/Windows guy. I can follow
> > good instructions and do some logical troubleshoo
Thanks Kari. That sounds like a viable option. Can you tell me how you did
that? I'm not a code warrior. I am an old DOS/Windows guy. I can follow good
instructions and do some logical troubleshooting but I'm not well versed in
making the compiler do cool tricks. :)
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 14
:03, Alex Lelievre via wsjt-devel wrote:
> > I believe you need 5.15.8_3 which is what I used for the Mac M1 build.
> >
> > best,
> > alex K6LOT
> >
> >
> >> On May 13, 2023, at 5:58 PM, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel
> >> wrote:
> >
2.7.0-rc1 fails to compile in Kubuntu 18.04 with the following errors:
[ 98%] Building CXX object qmap/CMakeFiles/qmap.dir/mainwindow.cpp.o
/home/nu0c/src/build/build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/mainwindow.cpp: In
constructor `MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget*)`:
So
All of the many software developers that work on the program, experienced
users, and technical specialists are wrong and you are right?
Got it.
On Sun, 7 May 2023 13:35:16 +1000
Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:
> But the one you tune in by moving green marker is your receiving
On Tue, 2 May 2023 10:57:17 +1000
Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:
You STILL do not understand.
> All the online definitions I find for 'split' operation are ;
>
> Split means transmitting on one frequency and listening on another.
>
> referring to your own station, without reference to anyone
You guys are saying the same thing if different ways. It is all split. Just
like repeater split, DXpedition split, and 40m DX split are all different kinds
of split so are rig split and audio split in WSJTX. If anything this just shows
that it needs to be clarified in the documentation so it
Just as a minor data point the waterfall does not necessarily need to fit the
monitor. On my laptop on the shack I have the waterfall extended to over 4000
Hz and the rightmost portion is usually off my screen to the right. If I want
to see what is up there I just drag the window to the left
They actually had a very detailed plan. FT8 included. But the best laid plans
go out the window when mother nature won't let you land most of your gear on
the island.
https://www.3y0j.no/bandplan
So you do the best you can with what little you have. Who knows, maybe their
GPS was in one of
WSJT-X 2.6.1, compiled from source for Kubuntu 18.04. It has generally been
working well.
This evening I was working W1AW/5 and after his RR73 my system sent a 73 to
W1AW/2:
234145 -8 0.1 2081 ~ CQ W1AW/5 U.S.A.
234215 -8 0.1 2082 ~ NU0C -10
234230 Tx 1954 ~ NU0C R-08
You can always "print" the html doc to a PDF file if that would meet your needs.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 1 Jan 2023 12:35:59 -0500
Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Oh,
> An HTML version is fine. That's all you ever had with V2.2.2 and a
> couple after that.
>
> My opinion is just
I've never had to use shift. Just prtsc by itself brings up Spectacle and I've
never had issues with it.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 03:41:00 +
Stan Gammons via wsjt-devel wrote:
> No idea why I
> can't do a shift print screen to do a screen capture with the save menu
> open in
This just makes too much sense. :) I don't get blind callers. I once called out
a guy for a social media post in which he was bragging about blind calling. He
tried to throw shade by asking me how many DX pilups I have been in. "Plenty.
Would you like to hear some of my recordings?". Never
This just makes too much sense. :) I don't get blind callers. I once called out
a guy for a social media post in which he was bragging about blind calling. He
tried to throw shade by asking me how many DX pilups I have been in. "Plenty.
Would you like to hear some of my recordings?". Never
Jim,
>
> Your admonition isn’t appropriate in this case. WSJT-X actually greyed out
> the relevant messages so they couldn’t be selected.
>
> Thanks,
> Russ KR6W
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 2022, at 8:29 PM, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel
> > wrote:
> &
You should be able to find this in your all.txt file.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 01:46:13 -0300
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> I asked to the DX station's QSL manager if he can send me the details of the
> QSO (Time and RST) registered by the Fox station on his ClubLog, so
Auto sequencing is not perfect and will fail eveyone sooner or later. In
circumstances where the auto sequencing fails it is the responsibility of the
operator to manually select the correct message to send, and to manually click
the Log QSO button if necessary.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 18
The S9OK DXpedition ops guide specifically states "Once you decode the message
‘ S9OK ... RR73' (also called the TX4 message) from us, you should
log the QSO."
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 19:33:27 -0400
Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Allen and Andy,
>
> Yes, it is not required.
Every ham with a modern HF rig has a simple, accurate, and reliable way of
getting the correct time. It's called WWV. If you can't hear WWV on at least
one frequency you either need to do some more antenna work or the bands are in
such bad shape you won't make many contacts anyway.
Other
fie wrote:
> > On Jul 9, 2021, at 19:11, Jim Shorney wrote:
> >
> > I would like to see a defined DX window also. Despite the WSJT-X magic
> > ability to separate signals the DX is often buried under the "locals”.
>
> I suppose the “locals” aren’t working DX? J
I would like to see a defined DX window also. Despite the WSJT-X magic ability
to separate signals the DX is often buried under the "locals".
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:59:23 -0400
Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited
And for those that advocate for the simplicity factor using WWV, your ears, and
your mouse finger is about as simple as it gets. And it works!
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 10:19:40 -0800
Mark Spencer wrote:
> Most of the time
> an initial manual sync of the computer clock while
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.3.0_en.html#_ap_decoding
73,
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:58:46 +0100
Maurizio Brameri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after some more investigation, I noted that it happens always when a
> station is calling CQ and it is decoded as
Compiled without errors and running in Kubuntu 18.04.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:41:57 -0500
Joe Taylor wrote:
> The third public candidate release of WSJT-X 2.3.0 is now available for
> download and use by beta testers.
___
wsjt-devel
wise, you change bands, click on a CQ and you're transmitting
> on top of someone who is already there instead of QSY to the CQ tx freq.
>
> Al
> AB2ZY
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jim Shorney [mailto:jshor...@inebraska.com]
> Sent: Sunday, De
i would vote "no" on this. I don't see it as being needed when shift-click
anywhere on the waterfall set you TX at any time. I would much rather not have
to re-enable Hold TX every time I change bands.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 03:10:26 +
Al Kozakiewicz wrote:
> 2. Clear
Spot om Adam. There are so many different operating modes and styles that a
dedicated log for each one quickly turns into a herd of cats WRT stats and
award tracking. A good master log saves the day.
One log to rule them all,
one log to find them,
One log to bring them all
and in the
Or toggle the Control checkbox.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:27:35 +0100
5p1kzx Michael <5p1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jerry
>
> Just pick somewhere on the edge. Drag and resize it a little bit. Then
> it wound be cleared.
>
> 5p1kzx, Michael
>
>
> Den 23-11-2020 kl. 22:37 skrev
Shift-click anywhere on the waterfall.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:36:22 +
Barry Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a hot key or something that I have missed to allow click/drag
> on the TX frequency slider?
> I often find that after initiating a contact I need to move TX while
>
Hit F2 and you skip the first two. It Advanced was the last tab you were in you
also skip the third. Quick and easy.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:12:04 +0100
Dieter Dippel wrote:
> Maybe I don't know how improve it, but for me it's always very complex
> (cumbersome) to move to
>
Create an Alias to run WSJT-X with the dark command line.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:42:04 + (UTC)
Timothy Nichols via wsjt-devel wrote:
> So, we're getting much closer. When I copied and pasted the command in
> Bill's e-mail, WSJTX does, indeed, open up in darkstyle -
Agreed. I just tested and it loaded a 10GB all.txt in seconds.
-Jim
NU0C
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:20:02 -0700
"David Beauchesne" wrote:
> Jim,
>
> Notepad++ is much faster (and free).
>
> David, AK2L
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Brown
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 12:07
>
This makes sense. The calling station heard you where you are. He may not hear
you if you move.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 30 May 2020 15:53:18 +0200
wrote:
> After testing a little bit I recognize: If I do an double click in Rx
> Frequency on an entry where I was named as receiver - than only
F2 > Reporting > Op Call
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Mon, 18 May 2020 00:34:22 +0200
Andreas Heertsch wrote:
> - Is it possible to *retain *the *Operator* too in the *Log QSO *window?
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
You know your QSO partner's audio offset frequency, it is easy enough to click
that point on the waterfall display to move the marker. "Close" is good enough.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 17:53:37 +
Andy Durbin wrote:
> I could not find my report in the archive but I did find this
For a general purpose shack computer it makes sense to buy all the horsepower
and RAM you can afford. I've tried to run WSJT-X on an underpowered computer in
a club shack and it wasn't pretty. Having said that, my shack box is an 8 year
old dual core i5 laptop with 16G RAM and terabyte SSD
Um, what? Of course skill is required at the lowest levels. Isn't that the
point? To develop a pool of skilled radio operators? How far do you want to
dumb it down?
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:38:50 +
Stephen Ireland wrote:
> So ... if skill is required at the lowest of
Well, yeah, that would be why I also referenced the definition of "Automatic
Operation".
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:03:16 -0700
Jim Preston wrote:
> Under FCC rules, automatic control means not having a control operator
> present at a control point.
ifference.
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:53 PM Jim Shorney wrote:
>
> >
> > Rules pertaining to Automatic Operation can be found in Part 97 sections:
> >
> > 97.3(6)
> > 97.221
> >
> > 73
> >
> > -Jim
> > NU0C
> >
> > On Sat
97.3(6) Automatic control. The use of devices and procedures for control of a
station when it is transmitting so that compliance with the FCC Rules is
achieved without the control operator being present at a control point.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 10:54:19 -0700
David Gilbert
Rules pertaining to Automatic Operation can be found in Part 97 sections:
97.3(6)
97.221
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:07:20 +
Andy Durbin wrote:
> "This is illegal software in the US and probably elsewhere, and should
> not be used, even with the added line "always attend to
I made a quick-connect bond for the seldom used VGA port on my laptop by
dismantling a DB-9 male connector to remove the inner plastic body that holds
the pins so I had just the metal shell. Hadn't thought of the USB ports. Great
idea!
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 00:50:16 -0700
Jim
And I have seen lags of hours or more when he is having system issues. That
does not change what I wrote. It is usually very good, of course depending on
the quality of the spots. You also have the ability to drill down to see where
the call you are after is being heard and how strong
Actually I would kind of like to hear the yodling! :D
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:13:47 +0100
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 07/08/2019 11:10, jarmo wrote:
> > Ok, now I throw ash on me, cut my wrists, hide my head into sand
> > and run into mountains do the yodling...
> >
> > Jarmo
PSK Reporter gathers spots in real time. The Screen refreshes every 5 minutes.
If you want NOW just refresh your browser.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:12:08 +0200
Claude Frantz wrote:
> On 8/7/19 9:30 AM, Bill Richter wrote:
>
> > PSK reporter is quite far from what you could call a
Oops, i meant fastest of course. N Avg 1.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 23:11:40 -0500
Jim Shorney wrote:
> run the waterfall at it's slowest speed
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.
. It can be very
informative and also a good way judge prop as someone else mentioned.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 06:52:06 +0300
jarmo wrote:
> Tue, 6 Aug 2019 20:43:46 -0500
> Jim Shorney kirjoitti:
>
> > I must be weird, I just use the waterfall for this.
> >
I must be weird, I just use the waterfall for this.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 11:52:42 -0400
Eric Spero via wsjt-devel wrote:
> I had to
> figure out why I was not seeing the others decoded signalsso I could
> insure I was not TX on another ham using the same offset I was.
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 15:47:17 -0600
Roy Gould wrote:
> I have been using FT4 since the release of 2.1.0 and find that I like it a
> lot better than FT8. It is twice as fast and features such as Best S+P are
> great. I have abandoned FT8 in favor of FT4. I anticipate that others will
> come to
Yes, and it helps the running contester to develop and maintain a rhythm. Give
him other than 59/599 and it will likely get logged as 59/599 so as not to
break the rhythm and slow things down. Even the meaningless has meaning.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:05:19 -0400
"Larry B. via
FWIW it looks fine in Kubuntu 18.04.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:08:52 +0100
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 16/07/2019 13:55, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote:
> > Marco,
> >
> > I appreciate you're trying to help George, and by extension, myself.
> > However, this issue is cross-platform. It
Also compiles and runs as expected so far with Kubuntu 18.04. Copied 1A0C in
the noise on 30 F/H but had to snag him on 40 CW for ATNO
73 & 44,
-Jim
NU0C
Zero District POTA Log Manager
http://www.parksontheair.com/
Zero and Seven Districts WWFF-KFF Log Manager
You know, you can set a computer clock with WWV +/- propagation delay and
muscle reaction time. It works and is very much like what one might do in the
field on a bad day. Don't over think it.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:15:00 -0400
Topher Petty wrote:
> Example from a quick
This seems to come up every few months. ALC is not the cause of the problem, it
is a symptom. The cause is overdrive of the mic audio chain and/or balanced
modulator. Poorly designed ALC can cause wide signals on voice but not with
continuous carrier modes like FT, but this is not harmonic
If you read the documentation and look at your calendar you will know exactly
what is going on.
On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 07:44:32 +0200
"ea4bas" wrote:
> Me too, I´m using
>
>
>
> Reinstalled 2.0.1 ver is all OK
>
>
>
> 73, Miguel
>
>
>
>
>
> De: Svend Aage Jessen
Bravo!
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 18:02:35 -0400
James Shaver wrote:
> No CAT control with this old rig (picture attached) and it holds its own ;)
>
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
The point was that CAT is not essential in any case. The notion that CAT is
*required* to use FT/JT modes is a myth propagated by those who don't know any
better. There are those of us who do not use CAT for whatever reason and we
appreciate the ability to operate this way. To successfully to
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:11:19 +0100
"Martin Davies G0HDB" wrote:
> The use of Split is all-but essential for slick operation in Hound mode,
> which is presumably
> why the software complained if you changed to a Hound configuration without
> one or other of
> the Split options being selected.
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 08:06:26 +0930
"Grant VK5GR" wrote:
> Fox and Hound was never in the main FT8 channels – indeed I believe Bill,
> Frank Joe and the team coded the system to not let you run F/H mode on the
> main FT8 channels.
which can easily be subverted by not using CAT control of
F2 is your friend. If 'Advanced" was the last active tab you you will be right
there. That's a single key stroke! What's so hard about that?
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:38:24 -0400
Frank Kirschner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 10:53 PM WB5JJJ wrote:
>
> > F/H is not something
Or just hit F2 and you are one or two mouse clicks away...
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 21:48:03 -0500
WB5JJJ wrote:
> F/H is not something you would normally select on a frequent basis, so a
> check box cluttering the main screen is not necessary.
>
> As previously suggested setting
Use your text editor's search function to search for any text string that you
want.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:59:16 +0100
"Martin Davies G0HDB" wrote:
> Could consideration please be given to reverting to using the 'Transmitting'
> label, or some
> other means (eg.
A while back a Cuban surfaced on one of the Facebook groups describing a system
he was coding that sounded very much like a QSO robot. After some blow back
from other group members he backpedaled and claimed that was not at all what he
was doing. Still, I wonder. The guy seems to be on the
That statement so totally proves that you missed the point of my comment.
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 11:01:54 +0200
Georg wrote:
> Why not. Amateur Radio was supposed to be experimental.
>
> > Am 31.03.2019 um 00:08 schrieb Jim Shorney :
> >
> >
> > And
And this helps improve one's skill as an operator HOW?
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 13:53:39 -0700
Al Pawlowski wrote:
> I do not have a problem with an auto-cq per se. Getting outraged before it’s
> been tried, or is causing an actual problem, seems to be "putting the cart
> before
This works pretty well for me with WSJT-X.
http://www.w1hkj.com/FldigiHelp/w5zit_rt_channel_page.html
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:10:43 -0400 (EDT)
lstosk...@cox.net wrote:
> I have a OSA103M transceiver that I want to try on 630M. Using HDSDR for
> control and of course WSJT for
Been there, done that. 14.04LTS is almost end-of-life and does not meet all the
dependencies. And it likely never will. Safest answer is upgrade to 18.04LTS.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 09:51:03 -0800
Paul Milligan wrote:
> I'm having a problem building the latest version wsjtx-2.0.0
There is some interesting reading on loop theory here:
http://w8ji.com/magnetic_receiving_loops.htm
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 06:13:25 +0800
Simon wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> Thanks for advises.
>
> Why u have a horizontal loop? From web photo, most is vertical (vertical as
> the hollywood
gt; for the sake of future development. Either way, its overcome by events and
> won't be an issue going forward.
>
> 73's
> Greg, KI7MT
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Shorney
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 11:11 PM
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
FWIW, I was on (Kubuntu) Trusty prior to the recent round of updates and RCs,
but it was getting to the point where keeping all the dependencies up to
current standards was a real chore as Trusty nears end of life. That prompted a
move to Bionic and software joy has returned.
I do appreciate
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:52:22 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 01:46, Jim Shorney wrote:
> > I have noticed a specific scenario that has happened several times during
> > the contest. This happens when I have called a CQing station two or three
> > times with no re
. It just works and once it has the local clock disciplined it doesn't
need to poll the servers very often.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:32:06 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 05/12/2018 03:52, Jim Shorney wrote:
> > NTP is a mature protocol and has been doing it right for years
NTP is a mature protocol and has been doing it right for years. Windows is late
to the party.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 18:52:37 -0800
Dana Myers wrote:
> > Why hesitate to install something that helps you and those your trying to
> > communicate with.
> If Windows is already
I would also be interested to find our what is going on here. It seems like
there are in reality two issues? Every computer has the log displaying in 12
hour format, and some computers additionally displaying local time while others
(who live nowhere near the prime meridian) display correct
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:27:50 -0500
"Larry Banks" wrote:
> I was going to say the /ME was not illegal, especially with the space: W1DYJ
> /ME.
Quite right. The problem is when people will try to log it as W1DYJ/ME. Trust
me, it will happen. Aside from that I really can't say if the FCC cares
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:42:30 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> point taken, but ME is not a valid UK prefix. We have 2E, MM etc. but
> the England M prefix is just plain 'M' followed by a digit.
Ah, my logging software's mistake then. I entered a test call with /ME and it
said England. I suppose
Not to mention that /ME would suggest that the op is in England, and would be a
rules violation if he is not.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:03:59 -0500
Joe Taylor wrote:
> Larry --
>
> On 12/3/2018 16:50, Larry Banks W1DYJ wrote:
>
> > I have just switched to 2.0 RC5. I use it
ree :).
> >
> > Well described by Charlie and Jim.
> >
> > 73, Paul K6PO
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:48 PM Jim Shorney wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks Charlie! Nice to know it isn't just me... :)
> >>
> >> 73
> >>
&g
Thanks Charlie! Nice to know it isn't just me... :)
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 21:20:39 -
char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
> Hi Jim
>
> Yes, we experienced the same behaviour where clicking an earlier message
> when bailing on a QSO ended up splitting the TX and RX
I have used tab 2 almost exclusively with JT modes. I would hate to see it go.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 08:49:03 -0600
Gene H wrote:
> To List,
>
> Please keep TAB 2 so it can be an option. I use it all the time for FT8
> contacts since inception.
>
> 73 Gene K5PA
>
>
> On
That seems to have been the problem with my WL7CG contact. I manually created a
log entry and it accepted it this time. Now, however, I am trying to correct
the hand in the log to 20m, but 20m does not show up on the selection list when
on that line. In fact, it only seems to show up on the
I don't know if there is any kind of check on the Operator field for something
that looks like a valid call, but you may want to put your call in there
anyway. Having your name in there is bound to confuse some software
somewhere... :)
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 20:41:37 -0500
Edfel
I wonder if it does not like that you have your name in the OPERATOR field
instead of your callsign. AFAIK the ADIF field that this maps to is for
operator call, which CAN be different from the station call under certain
circumstances.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 17:32:38 -0500
Edfel
I had the same happen with a contact with WL7CG. Nothing I did would make it
acceptable to the program. I just bailed and will enter it manually later.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 17:45:55 -0500
Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi Bill:
>
> TAB1 populates Recp Sent and Exc Sent, GRID was not
I looked at it. Saw the UI screen shots. No thanks. Sticking with WSJT-X.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 10:58:27 -0500
Neil Zampella wrote:
> Nope ...
>
> Last month .. still using the same encoder/decoder at least the
> name of the executable was finally changed last year.
> .. and
Hi Bill,
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 13:41:48 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> congratulations on the 4W ATNO!
Thanks!
> What rig do you use? Is CAT control simply not available for it or is
> there some other reason why you don't have it?
Vintage Drake 7-Line twins, circa 1980. CAT is not available.
I scored 4W for ATNO on 20M Fox/Hound today, pretty easily at that. Thanks to
the JT/FT developers once again for helping my DXCC count!
This bring up something I had been thinking about before. It would be nice for
those of us who do not use CAT for whatever reason to have an option to limit
That should be Operator Callsign, same as in Settings > Reporting.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 23:14:32 -0500
Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Mke sure to fill exchange sent and operator name.
--
“There’s something out of place – let’s go and poke it with a stick.” – The
Doctor, "Amy’s
Lots of fun tonight on 7.080. 20 contacts but it seemed like I had to work
harder than previous tests. Copied K1JT at -24 for a few minutes, so the band
definitely was not as good.
I was paying attention to the logging more closely based on some previous
comments and noted something that
So far I have seen two on who missed this
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:41:41 -0500
Joe Taylor wrote:
> Do not use a compound or nonstandard callsign
> in this event.
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Thanks Joe. Sadly, that is true. I will miss the dual mode. I try to make a JT
contact or two when I see band activity to keep the flame alive. Maybe activity
will pick up a little after the grid scrapers are done.
73
-Jim
NUoC
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:34:33 -0500
Joe Taylor wrote:
> If one
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
