de JA5AEA
Windows 10 版のメール<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>から送信
差出人: Tsutsumi Takehiko
送信日時: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 6:18:07 PM
宛先: WSJT software development
件名: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode
---This is n
ink/?LinkId=550986>から送信
差出人: Tsutsumi Takehiko
送信日時: Friday, March 30, 2018 1:54:29 PM
宛先: WSJT software development
件名: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode
Hi,
In this thread, I see a few comments related to JA spectrum allocation. T
Hi Richard G4DYA,
Thank you for providing the information as “1800-1810 KHz is allocated to the
radiolocation service om ITU Region 1”.
Now, I checked ITU RR and confirmed “Region 1” is allocated to solely
“RADIOLOCATION” and “AMATEUR” is not allocated.
Does this mean that co-sharing is
On 30/03/18 08:50, Tsutsumi Takehiko wrote:
> I with to hear comment about my suggestion to explore new harmonized spectrum
> of narrow band digital on 160m at 1800-1810KHz, where IARU Region II table
> has already allocated to narrow band digital. I believe this spectrum was
> used for
PM
To: WSJT software development<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode
Hi,
In this thread, I see a few comments related to JA spectrum allocation. Thus, I
summarized the status as follow for your reference.
1907.
Hi,
In this thread, I see a few comments related to JA spectrum allocation. Thus, I
summarized the status as follow for your reference.
1907.5-1912.5KHz (total 5kHz) is allocated to narrow band digital. Therefore,
both daily WSJT-X and DX pedition would be split mode. Daily FT-8 split QSO
On 3/29/2018 7:49 AM, Rich - K1HTV wrote:
*Being a 160M CW DXer, I too agree that 1826.5 is NOT a good spot for
the FT8 DXpedition frequency, as many other Topband DXers would also
agree. The highest end of the band has plenty of room, but many
antennas, cut for the low end of the band,
Being a 160M CW DXer, I too agree that 1826.5 is NOT a good spot for the FT8
DXpedition frequency, as many other Topband DXers would also agree. The highest
end of the band has plenty of room, but many antennas, cut for the low end of
the band, won't load well up there.
Although the 1836.6
mode.
Maybe that might work. I hope some other TB dxers could chime in.
Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu>
Sent: March 29, 2018 13:58
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-
Hi Jay,
On 3/29/2018 6:52 AM, Jay Hainline KA9CFD wrote:
Is the suggested Dxpedition frequency 1.8265 a typo? That would put it right in
the middle of the CW DX window on 160m. Surely a frequency of 1.836 would be a
better choice IMHO.
Thanks for catching this error. Not a typo, exactly,
: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode
The second public test of FT8 DXpedition mode will be conducted on April 7, a
little over a week from now. You are cordially invited to join us for this
Excellent, Look forward to it, Joe.
73, N0AN
Hasan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> The second public test of FT8 DXpedition mode will be conducted on April
> 7, a little over a week from now. You are cordially invited to join us for
> this test. See
The second public test of FT8 DXpedition mode will be conducted on April
7, a little over a week from now. You are cordially invited to join us
for this test. See the original announcement (copied below) for details.
Even if you read it before, be sure to read the latest revision of the
The WSJT Development Group is pleased to announce a third Release
Candidate of WSJT-X Version 1.9.0. A second release candidate,
v1.9.0-rc2, has been tested in the field over the past three weeks,
including a public test of FT8 DXpedition Mode conducted on March 6-7.
A General Availability
14 matches
Mail list logo