Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2019-09-10 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
de JA5AEA Windows 10 版のメール<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>から送信 差出人: Tsutsumi Takehiko 送信日時: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 6:18:07 PM 宛先: WSJT software development 件名: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode ---This is n

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2019-07-17 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
ink/?LinkId=550986>から送信 差出人: Tsutsumi Takehiko 送信日時: Friday, March 30, 2018 1:54:29 PM 宛先: WSJT software development 件名: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode Hi, In this thread, I see a few comments related to JA spectrum allocation. T

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-30 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
Hi Richard G4DYA, Thank you for providing the information as “1800-1810 KHz is allocated to the radiolocation service om ITU Region 1”. Now, I checked ITU RR and confirmed “Region 1” is allocated to solely “RADIOLOCATION” and “AMATEUR” is not allocated. Does this mean that co-sharing is

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-30 Thread Richard Lamont
On 30/03/18 08:50, Tsutsumi Takehiko wrote: > I with to hear comment about my suggestion to explore new harmonized spectrum > of narrow band digital on 160m at 1800-1810KHz, where IARU Region II table > has already allocated to narrow band digital. I believe this spectrum was > used for

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-30 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
PM To: WSJT software development<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode Hi, In this thread, I see a few comments related to JA spectrum allocation. Thus, I summarized the status as follow for your reference. 1907.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-29 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
Hi, In this thread, I see a few comments related to JA spectrum allocation. Thus, I summarized the status as follow for your reference. 1907.5-1912.5KHz (total 5kHz) is allocated to narrow band digital. Therefore, both daily WSJT-X and DX pedition would be split mode. Daily FT-8 split QSO

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-29 Thread Jim Brown
On 3/29/2018 7:49 AM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: *Being a 160M CW DXer, I too agree that 1826.5 is NOT a good spot for the FT8 DXpedition frequency, as many other Topband DXers would also agree. The highest end of the band has plenty of room, but many antennas, cut for the low end of the band,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-29 Thread Rich - K1HTV
Being a 160M CW DXer, I too agree that 1826.5 is NOT a good spot for the FT8 DXpedition frequency, as many other Topband DXers would also agree. The highest end of the band has plenty of room, but many antennas, cut for the low end of the band, won't load well up there. Although the 1836.6

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-29 Thread Jay Hainline
mode. Maybe that might work. I hope some other TB dxers could chime in. Jay KA9CFD -Original Message- From: Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> Sent: March 29, 2018 13:58 To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-29 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Jay, On 3/29/2018 6:52 AM, Jay Hainline KA9CFD wrote: Is the suggested Dxpedition frequency 1.8265 a typo? That would put it right in the middle of the CW DX window on 160m. Surely a frequency of 1.836 would be a better choice IMHO. Thanks for catching this error. Not a typo, exactly,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-29 Thread Jay Hainline
: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode The second public test of FT8 DXpedition mode will be conducted on April 7, a little over a week from now. You are cordially invited to join us for this

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-28 Thread Hasan al-Basri
Excellent, Look forward to it, Joe. 73, N0AN Hasan On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: > The second public test of FT8 DXpedition mode will be conducted on April > 7, a little over a week from now. You are cordially invited to join us for > this test. See

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-28 Thread Joe Taylor
The second public test of FT8 DXpedition mode will be conducted on April 7, a little over a week from now. You are cordially invited to join us for this test. See the original announcement (copied below) for details. Even if you read it before, be sure to read the latest revision of the

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

2018-03-19 Thread Joe Taylor
The WSJT Development Group is pleased to announce a third Release Candidate of WSJT-X Version 1.9.0. A second release candidate, v1.9.0-rc2, has been tested in the field over the past three weeks, including a public test of FT8 DXpedition Mode conducted on March 6-7. A General Availability