Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate Release WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1 Linux compile

That's not trivial either. But with 18.04 going end of support it is inevitable. I'm just looking for an easy fix, as usual. I did find a qt515 ppa for Bionic but I have no clue how to make it work. Going to try asking Mr. Google again Then maybe off to the Ubuntu forums. 73 -Jim NU0C

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate Release WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1 Linux compile

Looks like on Kubuntu 22.04, I have QT packages from versions 5.15.3 to 5.15.9 Maybe time to upgrade to a later OS version? 73 Stan KM4HQE On 5/13/23 20:03, Alex Lelievre via wsjt-devel wrote: > I believe you need 5.15.8_3 which is what I used for the Mac M1 build. > > best, > alex K6LOT > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate Release WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1 Linux compile

I believe you need 5.15.8_3 which is what I used for the Mac M1 build. best, alex K6LOT > On May 13, 2023, at 5:58 PM, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel > wrote: > >  > 2.7.0-rc1 fails to compile in Kubuntu 18.04 with the following errors: > > [ 98%] Building CXX object

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate Release WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1 Linux compile

2.7.0-rc1 fails to compile in Kubuntu 18.04 with the following errors: [ 98%] Building CXX object qmap/CMakeFiles/qmap.dir/mainwindow.cpp.o /home/nu0c/src/build/build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/mainwindow.cpp: In constructor `MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget*)`:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

George What operating system are you using? Since you're the first with a 7610, I"d like to include you as a tester. Dennis W1UE On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 5:01 PM WB5JJJ via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > This also affected the IC-7610, but the new file fixed the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1

John What is your operating system? Thanks! Dennis W1UE On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 8:38 AM g4kla--- via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Mike, > > No problem with Hamlib-4.6 on Kenwood TS870s. Working correctly with dual > VFOs (Split Operation: Rig) > > — John G4KLA > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1

This also affected the IC-7610, but the new file fixed the problem. 73's George - WB5JJJ HoIP - 100105 On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 2:43 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Try this dll please > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

This also affected the IC-7610, but the new file fixed the problem. 73's George - WB5JJJ HoIP - 100105 On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:29 AM Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hey Uwe > > While manual testing could probably never be eliminated in the case of >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Volunteers Needed- Hamlib Reviews

Hi Dennis, I can test with this if you need help with this combination: Windows 10 22H2, Kenwood TS590SG, USB cable controlled. Do you need more specifics on Version numbers of anything? So far I have had no hamlib trouble with this combination with 2.2.2, 2.5.4, 2.6.1. --73, Glenn, AF8C

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Volunteers Needed- Hamlib Reviews

I should clarify: only the K3 is turned on at the moment, but I'd be happy to test. On Sat, 13 May 2023, Black Michael wrote: Looks for any errors at all during startup or normal operations. In particular using Fake It or Rig Split Mike W9MDB On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 09:35:42 AM

Re: [wsjt-devel] Error Loading LOTW Users Data

Hi Jim, This is something for Brian, N9ADG. He programmed this feature. Have you followed the steps described in chapter 3.1 of the user guide and installed the Windows OpenSSL Packages ? 73 de DG2YCB, Uwe

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compiling new hamlib

What do you mean "it does not find my Hamlib net rigctld,"  -- is there some error message? Mike W9MDB On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 09:41:27 AM CDT, jarmo wrote: Sat, 13 May 2023 12:42:20 + (UTC) Black Michael via wsjt-devel kirjoitti: Hi Mike & No, I did git pull on to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compiling new hamlib

Sat, 13 May 2023 12:42:20 + (UTC) Black Michael via wsjt-devel kirjoitti: Hi Mike & No, I did git pull on to existing hamlib. Renamed it and With clean git clone, everything went ok. Compiled and is running. Now BUT... When I take wsjtx, git clone etc... Seems to go ok, compilation and

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Volunteers Needed- Hamlib Reviews

Looks for any errors at all during startup or normal operations. In particular using Fake It or Rig Split Mike W9MDB On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 09:35:42 AM CDT, Hisashi T Fujinaka via wsjt-devel wrote: I have an Elecraft K3 and an Elecraft K4 and I'm running MacOS. I could test

[wsjt-devel] Error Loading LOTW Users Data

Using WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1. Windows 11 When I click "Fetch Now" in the "Logbook of the World User Validation section, I get an error stating: Error Loading LOTW Users Data TLS initialization failed. 73, Jim N6VH ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Volunteers Needed- Hamlib Reviews

I have an Elecraft K3 and an Elecraft K4 and I'm running MacOS. I could test but I haven't had much problem and I'm not entirely sure what we're testing. The only thing I ever check to make sure is tht the band is changing. I've never been on the QA side of software development. On Sat, 13 May

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1 Mac build changes

Yes, I did the same. I sent the diffs to Uwe. So far, there are a few quirks in the rc. Mostly with jt-bridge integration not working the same as before. Double clicking on a non-CQing station doesn't seem to populate the DX call but can put your station into "Enable TX" so instead of calling DX

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

I agree on Uwes position over '''Rejnos, certainty... On 13/5/23 22:59, Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel wrote: Hey Reino I fully understand your concerns. Clearly this idea has been considered. Conceptually I believe a slightly different approach might overcome some of those difficulties, however I

[wsjt-devel] Hamlib hotfixes

Hi all, As a help for those of you having problems with CAT control of your rig with v2.7.0-rc1, I have copied the latest hamlib hotfixes to the folder listed below. You will find there not only files for Windows but also for macOS and Raspberry Pi.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

Hey Reino I fully understand your concerns. Clearly this idea has been considered. Conceptually I believe a slightly different approach might overcome some of those difficulties, however I am conscious of derailing Uwe’s thread, so I won’t. Uwe, good luck with the search. Best wishes Tom On

[wsjt-devel] Volunteers Needed- Hamlib Reviews

I'm looking to get a group of ops together to review Hamlib files prior to the release of new ones. Any op with any rig is eligible to apply. If you're interested, please specify your rig, version of Windows (or your OS), and any other specifics that may be applicable. Our immediate task is to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compiling new hamlib

Do you have an old libhamlib sitting around?  Did you uninstall the hamlib package? Mike W9MDB On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 04:35:41 AM CDT, jarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: Just started trying compile hamlib in Fedora 38. Got error make[1]: Siirrytään hakemistoon

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1

Mike, No problem with Hamlib-4.6 on Kenwood TS870s. Working correctly with dual VFOs (Split Operation: Rig) — John G4KLA smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

[wsjt-devel] Head of a new Hamlib Beta Testing Group found

Hi all, I am pleased to announce that Dennis, W1UE has agreed to take responsibility for hamlib beta testing. So: *I hereby appoint him as our new official head of the Hamlib Beta Testing Group!* Concrete next steps of the new Hamlib Beta Testing Group should be the following: 1. Find beta

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

I have been writing simulators but they do not have the nuances that the rigs do.  There's all sorts of oddities. Butthe plan is to eventually incorporate those simulators in the "make test" in Hamlib that should catch big mistakes. It's on my to-do list but don't hold your breath...it's a

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX Cabrillo log time

Regarding logged time in cabrillo. Let's reason backwards: 1. Cabrillo is a file format used for submitting contest logs only. 2. Cabrillo is a file format normally created from an ADIF file that is created by specialized logging software, say N1MM Logger+, WinTest or some other contest software.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1

Here is the most recent Hamlib libhamlib.so.4.0.6 for Raspberry Pi (RPi version of the .dll) https://www.dropbox.com/s/a9gdyo3qayp86yc/libhamlib.so.4.0.6?dl=0 > On May 13, 2023, at 5:28 AM, Gary Rogers wrote: > > Here is the most recent Hamlib .dylib for MacOS (dylib is the Mac version of

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1

Mike, No problem with Hamlib-4.6 on Kenwood TS870s. Working correctly with dual VFOs (Split Operation: Rig) — John G4KLA smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

> From: Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sent: lauantai 13. toukokuuta 2023 10.58 >While manual testing could probably never be eliminated in the case of hamlib, >has there been any consideration of creating test harnesses to remove/reduce >the need for

[wsjt-devel] Compiling new hamlib

Just started trying compile hamlib in Fedora 38. Got error make[1]: Siirrytään hakemistoon ”/home/oh1mrr/Hamlib/c++” CXXLDlibhamlib++.la /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/12/../../../../lib64/crti.o: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: cannot find

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

Hey Uwe While manual testing could probably never be eliminated in the case of hamlib, has there been any consideration of creating test harnesses to remove/reduce the need for manual testing? It strikes me that there could be potential to capture test cases from manual testing with real rigs,

[wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

Dear WSJT-X users, Please allow me to summarize again here on this email reflector a topic that is very important to me and to all of us. My original post was on https://groups.io/g/wsjtgroup, so maybe it's best if you join the discussion there. Despite great personal commitment of the hamlib