Folks,
I can vouch for the usefulness of RRR on FT8 in certain situations, such as
running QRP 5 Watts. I often found, as a QRP station, that I needed to run with
RRR as my default TX4 message to ensure the other end heard my reply and
confirm a contact, otherwise they may miss the RR73 and
>From the WSJT-X User guide:
Section 7.1 : Standard messages -" The RR73 message should be used only if you
are reasonably confident that no repetitions will be required."
Section 7.4 : Contest messages -"Always log a QSO when you have received RRR,
RR73, or 73 from a station you are working."
I actually see RRR fairly often. In many cases I think it is newbies who have
not read the manual.
The thing that puzzles me a bit is that occasionally I will work an op who
sends RR73 and then after my 73 he also sends a 73. At that point it starts to
feel a little like a Alphonse and
It's not a waste of time
Here's why (especially on weak signals or when the band is flaky or QRM).
.start of QSOW9MDB W0YK R-13W0YK W9MDB RR73 -- band goes flaky but I'm
supposed to think the QSO is done...but you don't decode the RR73.W9MDB W0YK
R-13 -- you repeat because you didn't
Hi Reino,
Not to beat the issue to death but this does not always work. A strong signal
may dissipate.
Some months ago, there was a nice 2 meter band opening into Texas from here in
NJ. I worked several FT8 stations. Signals were strong, but the band just
dropped out, suddenly. I
ThxSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/22/23 12:28 AM (GMT-05:00) To:
sdegroff via wsjt-devel Cc: Black Michael
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Fox/HoundFor dxpeditions...see the
ThxSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/22/23 6:49 AM (GMT-05:00) To:
WSJT software development Cc: Hasan N0AN
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Fox/Hound modeHasanOn Sat, Oct 21, 2023
Fox/Hound mode
Hasan
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:20 PM sdegroff via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> What is F/H mode ?
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>
> Original message
> From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel
> Date: 10/21/23 11:22
1,8 – 70 MHz
Lähetetty Windowsin Sähköpostiista
Lähettäjä: Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
Lähetetty: sunnuntai 22. lokakuuta 2023 12.56
Vastaanottaja: 'WSJT software development'
Kopio: Reino Talarmo
Aihe: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Keijo, which bands you have used? Perhaps HF and
Agree 100%. The number of ops who refuse to be control operators and just log and move on because, “the software didn’t tell me the QSO is complete” is staggering.On Oct 22, 2023, at 1:06 AM, Ed W0YK via wsjt-devel wrote:+173,Ed W0YK Original message From: Ron WV4P via wsjt-devel
Keijo, which bands you have used? Perhaps HF and 6 m during Es propagation?
73, Reino OH3mA
From: OG55W via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2023 10:08 AM
To: WSJT software development
Cc: OG55W
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after
Last two months I have had about 5000 FT8/FT4 QSOs. I have received just one
RRR, all the others were RR73. So RRR is not in use very much…
73 Keijo OG5O
Lähetetty Windowsin Sähköpostiista
Lähettäjä: Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
Lähetetty: sunnuntai 22. lokakuuta 2023 8.49
Vastaanottaja: 'WSJT
12 matches
Mail list logo
