Fox/Hound mode Hasan
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:20 PM sdegroff via wsjt-devel < [email protected]> wrote: > What is F/H mode ? > > > > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel <[email protected]> > Date: 10/21/23 11:22 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: WSJT software development <[email protected]> > Cc: sdegroff <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? > > Huh? > > > > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel <[email protected]> > Date: 10/21/23 7:06 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: [email protected] > Cc: Andy Durbin <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? > > After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use > of F/H mode. I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto > sequenced after RR73 was received. > > I'll need to be careful to ensure TX5 is set correctly when in QSO. > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Andy Durbin > *Sent:* Saturday, October 21, 2023 12:14 PM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* No 73 allowed after RR73? > > WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1. > > I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending > 73 after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H > active but not when F/H is not active. I suspect that something is latched > in software if F/H mode has been used but is then exited and WSJT-X is not > re-started. > > Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation? > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
