It's not a waste of time....
Here's why (especially on weak signals or when the band is flaky or QRM).
.....start of QSO....W9MDB W0YK R-13W0YK W9MDB RR73 -- band goes flaky but I'm
supposed to think the QSO is done...but you don't decode the RR73.W9MDB W0YK
R-13 -- you repeat because you didn't get the RR73 but since our path is flaky
I don't get this R-13 so I still think I'm done.W9MDB W0YK R-13 -- you repeat
again -- I still don't receive youad nauseum until you give up.
I logged you because I sent RR73 and got no other message from you. You didn't
log me as you never received RR73.If had sent RRR instead I would repeat 73
until I got your 73.
That's why it says only use RR73 on a strong signal that you don't expect to
have any problems with.
Mike W9MDB
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:09:40 AM CDT, Ed W0YK via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
RR73 completes the QSO. Both QSO partners have sent calls, exchanges and
QSLs. Am additional 73 message is a waste of time.
73,Ed W0YK
-------- Original message --------From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 10/21/23 13:18 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT
software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: sdegroff
<sdegr...@reagan.com> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
I don't know what F/H is, but i have seen wsjtx hang and not complete the qso
after RR73.
Stan DeGroff W8SRD
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 10/21/23 3:49 PM (GMT-05:00) To:
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andy Durbin <a.dur...@msn.com> Subject:
[wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.
I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73
after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H active but
not when F/H is not active. I suspect that something is latched in software if
F/H mode has been used but is then exited and WSJT-X is not re-started.
Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation?
73,Andy, k3wyc_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
