[wsjt-devel] macOS - Is there a "quick" way of updating Hamlib on MacOS implementation?

I have seen Windows instructions to replace a Hamlib dll to get the latest version of Hamlib. Is there the same capability on macOS so we can test and validate Hamlib issues without having to compile WSJT-X? Regards Dwayne AB6A ___ wsjt-devel mailing

Re: [wsjt-devel] macOS - Is there a "quick" way of updating Hamlib on MacOS implementation?

0dylib%20placement%20MacOS.png?dl=0 > > > All the above assumes you installed the WSJT-X .dmg file from the Sourceforge > website and that you have not compiled WSJT-X on your own. > > Let me know if you have any further questions. > >> On Jun 12, 2023, at 1:38 PM,

[wsjt-devel] Q65-15A Broken?

There have been ongoing reports from various operators best summarized in the post attached that Q65-15A is “broken”. What is current consensus on this and if it is broken, is there any plans to address the issues? https://www.bobatkins.com/radio/Q65-15_eme_II.html Regards Dwayne AB6A

Re: [wsjt-devel] Q65-15A Broken?

why? > > Are you (or they?) talking about EME? If so, are you aware that the Q65-15x > submodes are not supposed to work for EME. The 2.5 s EME delay is too large. > >-- 73, Joe, K1JT > >> On 1/22/2024 2:04 PM, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel wrote: >> There ha

Re: [wsjt-devel] Q65-15A Broken?

Yes - many of us are already using Q65-30B on 23CM EME. Looking for “faster” ;) Regards Dwayne AB6A > On Jan 22, 2024, at 12:44 PM, Lance Collister, W7GJ via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > There is the 30 second option... > > On 1/22/2024 20:36:37, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-deve

Re: [wsjt-devel] Q65-15A Broken?

24, at 11:54 AM, Joe Taylor wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dwayne, >>> >>> Thanks for the QSO with W2ZQ, last evening. >>> >>> Who is saying Q65-15A is broken, and why? >>> >>> Are you (or they?) talking about EME? If so, are you a

[wsjt-devel] EME Doppler Control without Monitoring Enabled + Q65-20M

Our recent discussion on UHF/SHF (23cm) EME Q65 confirmed today the fastest mode available is Q65-30B. WSJT-X does an outstanding job of doppler control and can be used to control doppler for CW QSO’s via configuring Preferences/Radio/Mode to None so that the mode of the transceiver (in CW mode)

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

The Darwin disk image for RC4 is corrupt. Only has a 281 byte file size. Dwayne AB6A > On Mar 11, 2024, at 7:57 AM, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Dear WSJT-X Users, > > We are pleased to announce that Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4 is ready > for download and use by beta testers

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X on Local and Remote Stations - Nasty Automatic Transmit Enable

I was working WSJT-X F&H mode on both my local (DM03) and remote station (CN95) Both WSJT-X were in Hound mode. Local station was on standby monitoring same band. I started working the Fox from CN95 and when the Fox responded to my callsign, WSJT-X on DM03 automatically Enabled TX and tried to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X on Local and Remote Stations - Nasty Automatic Transmit Enable

pen to abuse. -D > On Nov 5, 2021, at 4:13 PM, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > On 05/11/2021 22:34, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel wrote: >> I was working WSJT-X F&H mode on both my local (DM03) and remote station >> (CN95) Both WSJT-X were in Hound

Re: [wsjt-devel] TX..RX with different radios

I have done this a few times just to prove to myself that TX is not an issue - Better receive is where I would get the best improvement in WSJT-X. Both Mac and Windows have native and third party capability to split Audio so TX can go one direct and RX the other. WSJT-X TX and CAT Control can be

[wsjt-devel] TX..RX with different radios

Sure… All the LOTW awards come with rules. Here are the rules for DXCC: http://www.arrl.org/dxcc-rules You can have a split transmitter and receiver but it needs to be within 500M of each other... a) All stations used to make contacts for a specific DXCC award

Re: [wsjt-devel] TX..RX with different radios

vel > wrote: > > On 8/24/2022 12:57 PM, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel wrote: >> Sure… All the LOTW awards come with rules. > > LOTW does not issue awards. It is ONLY a worldwide log book that the issuers > of awards can consult to document QSOs. Some issuers of awards ar

[wsjt-devel] Q65 T/R Cycle Submode Tracking

There are technical discussions and associated websites that describes the optimal submode for the various T/R Cycles - T/R 15 Seconds Submode A T/R 30 Seconds Submode B T/R 60 Seconds Submode C T/R 120 Seconds Submode D T/R 300 Seconds Submode E Would it be possible to add a switch to setting t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Q65 T/R Cycle Submode Tracking

number > of factors are in play. Have you read the Q65 Quick Start Guide? > > 73 > > Charlie DL3WDG > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 20:03, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel > mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> > wrote: >> There are technical discussions and

Re: [wsjt-devel] 3Y0J strange F/H operation

There is no question the Expedition messed up with F&H. Simple as that. Add it to the list of lessons learned for subsequent expeditions. Regards Dwayne AB6A > On Feb 15, 2023, at 8:04 AM, David Kjellquist via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Unlike WSJT-X, JTDX software allows F&H on either odd or ev

Re: [wsjt-devel] 3Y0J strange F/H operation

I agree with you 100% but that does not take away the fact there was abundant confusion for many ops. Just watching this play out, you would see almost the same amount of ops transmitting odd as well as even attempting to respond. In my humble opinion, they should have been using F&H and even.

[wsjt-devel] Q65 Doppler Mode / Flex Radio 6400 (with 2 Slices only)

There is a nasty bug which destroyed two EME sessions for me. Not sure where the problem lies (WSJT-X/Hamlib/Flex etc) … If SmartSDR 3.4 has two Slices active when starting WSJT-X, enabling Q65 Doppler Tracking will cause CAT to fail. CAT turns from Green to Orange and stops responding to WSJT-

[wsjt-devel] Is call3.txt still used in current versions of WSJT-X?

Is call3.txt no longer used or only used for some modes such as JT65? I have seen comments to suggest call3.txt has been depreciated in latest versions of WSJT-X but nothing I could see in release notes. Q65 documents detail when setting up scheduled QSO’s, to fill in the DX CALL and generate m

[wsjt-devel] Truncated Waterfall Display "Feature"

Last night, I met an operator who was struggling with EME on 23CM after abandoning EME on the 70CM band. As soon as he started up WSJT-X, I noted his waterfall display was set to Bins/Pixel 2 instead of 5/6 and less than 1500Hz was displayed on the screen. All decodes 1500Hz and up were not deco

Re: [wsjt-devel] Truncated Waterfall Display "Feature"

portant to make sure his receiver > bandwidth is wide enough to pass the signal at that frequency. > > 73, Russ K2TXB > > -----Original Message- > From: Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 11:35 AM > To: WSJT software development > Cc:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Truncated Waterfall Display "Feature"

I agree but it is not intuitive that Start Hz is an option in the controls, but end Hz is controlled by Bin Pixels and how far the op stretches the window. 73 Dwayne AB6A > On Apr 5, 2023, at 10:13 AM, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Perhaps also reading User Guide 6.2. Wide Graph

Re: [wsjt-devel] Truncated Waterfall Display "Feature"

Just to add, It would seem to be the intuitive fix would be Start and End Hz as options in the controls or Settings Menu defaulting to 0Hz and 3000Hz and not affected by Bin/Pixel setting or how far the window is stretched. 73 Dwayne AB6A > On Apr 5, 2023, at 10:19 AM, Dwayne Sinclair wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Using EME Doppler Control for CW?

> >> On Oct 22, 2024 at 2:11 PM, > <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: >> >> What rig do you have? >> Mike W9MDB >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Oct 22, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel >>

[wsjt-devel] Using EME Doppler Control for CW?

WSJT-X does a great job with EME Doppler. When switching to CW, WSJT-X will continue to track RX frequency but TX frequency will be static unless WSJT-X is TX’ing or Tune button is Pressed. Is it possible like RX, TX Split frequency is also updated while not Transmitting? Regards Dwayne AB6A

Re: [wsjt-devel] Using EME Doppler Control for CW?

have? > Mike W9MDB > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 22, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel >> wrote: >> >> WSJT-X does a great job with EME Doppler. When switching to CW, WSJT-X will >> continue to track RX frequency but TX freque

Re: [wsjt-devel] Using EME Doppler Control for CW?

Thank you Joe - I actually was able to do all these steps before your post and it all worked perfectly. The only Gotcha for others using Icom Split Transceivers (IC-9700/IC-905/IC-705) - 1. Configure WSJT-X (and everything else) as you do for digital EME. 2. Be sure that "Settings -> Radio -> M

[wsjt-devel] MacOS ARM build from source?

Anyone successful building WSJT-X arm64 and if so, share your steps? Regards Dwayne AB6A ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] MacOS ARM build from source?

25, 2024, at 12:17 PM, Alex Lelievre via wsjt-devel wrote:A couple of us build it and Uwe’s version are prebuilt for Arm64.Here are my steps :How to build WSJT-X on the Apple M1folabs.combest,alexOn Oct 25, 2024, at 10:52 AM, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel wrote:Anyone successful building WSJT-X

Re: [wsjt-devel] RIT (Not Split) Please

t. > > It has been tested on-air and works. > > 73 > > Charlie DL3WDG > > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 07:01, Dwayne Sinclair via wsjt-devel > mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> > wrote: >> That time of the year again and I apologize as this has been as

[wsjt-devel] RIT (Not Split) Please

That time of the year again and I apologize as this has been asked before. Can we get the option to RIT (don’t want to say Split) between TX and RX frequencies with and without Doppler control? Because of the upcoming band changes and miss alignment in both 23CM and 13CM to name two bands, it w