Re: [wsjt-devel] ignore this

2023-05-16 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Got it. Al Hasan On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM a.groff via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Just testing > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-dev

Re: [wsjt-devel] Memory leak in 2.7.0 rc1?

2023-05-26 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Around 125 MB, consistent with changing configurations (separate configs for each mode). FT8, MSK144, FT8,...all around 125 MB starting. Q65 127 MB after about 2 hours of operation, so it is essentially the same. We checked with our zoom group, we are all running WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC1 Improved Plus by

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

2023-10-22 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Fox/Hound mode Hasan On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:20 PM sdegroff via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > What is F/H mode ? > > > > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > > Original message > From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel > Date: 10/21/23 11:22 P

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 46

2024-01-27 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
HI Uwe, This should be eliminated, it resulted in several unintended transmissions with the antenna not switched or amp not tuned. I like the fact that you removed it. By the way, with the "240202" update I also plan to deactivate this strange function that pressing the RETURN or ENTER keys switch

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc5

2024-07-01 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Joe, et al, All I can say is "Wow!" The help is excellent, Uwe's video for those of us running Improved is very informative. We can't thank you enough for bringing us this continuing development in the WSJT-X Suite. I especially appreciate the Help > SuperFox User Guide, which answers many question

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc5

2024-07-01 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Won't work is kind of a vague "not working" report. What is not working? CAT Control? Audio Input? Audio Output? PTT ? Split Operation? Fake It? The first thing t check is the Radio Settings in WSJT-X. Make sure those have not changed. Then audio settings...is usb control reselect the Tx Audio and

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox Keys

2024-07-02 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Joe and Uwe have published *.wav files that can be downloaded to test the SuperFox decoder. The have been included in messages in both Uwe's and the standard forums. This is the result of the one Joe referred to: (just File > Open the file with SuperFox enabled) -- 2024-07-02 - 22:24:00

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox Keys

2024-07-02 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
> > Is it repeated continuously? > > > 73, > > Sam W2JDB > > > > On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 06:32:06 PM EDT, Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > Joe and Uwe have published *.wav files that can be downloaded

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox Keys

2024-07-02 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
continuously? > > > 73, > > Sam W2JDB > > > > On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 06:32:06 PM EDT, Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > Joe and Uwe have published *.wav files that can be downloaded to test the > SuperFo

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox Keys

2024-07-03 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
s like > some islanders, expats, and holiday stations. Unless NCDXC makes the > application > for a certificate very streamlined, like a web based robot, of course. > > Björn SM7IUN > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 2:36 AM Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourc

Re: [wsjt-devel] Verified message not always present v2.7.0-rc5

2024-07-14 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
A known problem along with the grid not always accompanying the CQ. They are working on. On Sun, Jul 14, 2024, 11:07 AM Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I have noticed when monitoring K8R that the message "K8R verified" is not > always displayed. The varia

Re: [wsjt-devel] Signal reports for -rc6

2024-07-19 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Mike, It decoded fine here on my RSPdx SDR -- 2024-07-19 - 22:24:30 UTC - 15m - FT8 215130 13 0.1 748 ~ N1QV KH7Z RR73 215130 13 0.1 748 ~ NN7SS KH7Z RR73 215130 13 0.1 748 ~ PA2LO KH7Z RR73 215130 13 0.1 748 ~ W2ZQ KH7Z RR73 215130 13 0.1 748 ~ PB8DX KH7Z RR73 215130 13 0.1 748 ~ K9AN K

Re: [wsjt-devel] Signal reports for -rc6

2024-07-19 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Whoops, maybe that was not K8R...sorry about that Hasan On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 4:55 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I used this WAV file > > > https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/stohwy3veidevmwr4j517/240605_181330.wav?rlkey=85h1c9riskq1mmbqzex9hpov3&dl=1

Re: [wsjt-devel] Signal reports for -rc6

2024-07-19 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
21.091 DF 745 Hasan On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 5:33 PM Star Light via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > What freq. are they on ? > Thanks, Russ KR6W > > > On Jul 19, 2024, at 3:26 PM, Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge

Re: [wsjt-devel] Signal reports for -rc6

2024-07-19 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Joe, I have experimentally determined that my threshold is about -15 to -16...so seems to agree with theory. New veision is doing well. +6 is as strong as I have seen any signal from K8R and it decoded it no problem. Tomorrow morning, if they are on 20m, that should be a good test, because they h

Re: [wsjt-devel] SF rc6 TX signal "fuzz"

2024-07-23 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Andy, Turn your waterfall gain down (top left slider) and it will clean it up mostly. I have a +20 dB SNR file and it is awful looking until you turn the gain of the waterfall down. This has nothing to do with decoding, simply a display issue of limited dynamic range. 73, N0AN Hasan On Mon, Ju

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

2024-07-24 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Jonathon, Then don't use SuperFox Hasan On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:25 AM Jonathan McComb via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/superflawed/ > > The Superfox mode uses security by obscurity, (which is never a good > thing) by failing t

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

2024-07-24 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Yes, congratulations are in order. You have now made it easy for the Pirates, before it was somewhat more difficult. Way to go. Hasan On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:31 AM Jonathan McComb via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hasan, > > Did you actually take the time to read **an

Re: [wsjt-devel] ALL.TXT RX freq is not RX DIAL freq

2024-07-30 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
The problem with adding the DF offset is when the frequency is published/spotted, (like on QRZ or DXSummit), it is listed as 14.09175...which is NOT the frequency that you need your radio tuned to for CAT control. If you click on a spot and have CAT control, you will be on the wrong freq. In the

Re: [wsjt-devel] ALL.TXT RX freq is not RX DIAL freq

2024-07-30 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
gt; > > > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 08:03:29 AM CDT, Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > > > > The problem with adding the DF offset is when the frequency is > published/spotted, (like on QRZ or DXSummit), i

Re: [wsjt-devel] ALL.TXT RX freq is not RX DIAL freq

2024-07-30 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
I think the proposed solution is worse than alleged problem. All one has to do is enter or select the drop down freq...CAT will change the VFO, the resulting passband will be 0 - 3000 Hz or whatever your rx supports..and the signals will be there. What is the problem? It's not as if we are in a F

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox Testing - Timor-Leste/4W

2024-08-03 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Alan, Talk to Joe (K1JT) off list. The SuperFox keys are being closely held and as you noted, are only normally available to 'certified' DXpeditions. Whether Joe will take you up on the offer is best handled privately and not on this list, with the inevitable cheerleaders and their counterparts. 7

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox Testing - Timor-Leste/4W

2024-08-03 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
I thought the OP was asking for a one time exception to the regular DXpedition process, for testing, hence my recommendation to contact Joe privately to see what he thought. 73, N0AN Hasan On Sat, Aug 3, 2024, 12:25 PM Gary McDuffie via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: >

Re: [wsjt-devel] AGC affecting SuperFox decoding #FH

2024-08-07 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
I have been using Martin's settings on my 7300 for over a year. (I arrived at these settings experimentally, collecting data on the number of decodes per sequence in the presence of strong signals.) AGC FAST and audio level adjusted for about 55 dB on band noise, produced the largest number of dec

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] HH2AA?

2024-08-17 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
el < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Sat, 17 Aug 2024 05:13:58 -0500 > Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel kirjoitti: > > > Probably a Pirate, in any case, not a DXPedition. They are affiliated > > with a Paid Remote Site (according to QRZ)l, and *should have been > > looked

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] HH2AA?

2024-08-17 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
W2RE is the owner. Contact him or WW2DX. > > Not sure what’s meant by “forged key.” I don’t think they would do > something like that. > > Ria > N2RJ > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 8:42 AM jarmo via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox vs Fox

2024-08-24 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
I have seen this same phenomenon when a filter is engaged (improved plus), and the filter is set to exclude the USA...and it thinks K8R or N5J is in the USA. I had it happen to me... 73, N0AN Hasan On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 8:35 AM Charles Suckling via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox vs Fox

2024-08-25 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Anyone in the continental USA that did not copy N5J at any time during their stay when they operated on SuperFox, was obviously not there when propagation peaked in their area. Bad timing. It had nothing to do with SuperFox vs. standard F/H. When they were on 20 meters in the mornings, I was able

Re: [wsjt-devel] Superfox DT offset

2024-08-26 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
0.6 is fairly typical , with .3 to .4 even more common. No problems decodingwith this latency in SF. 73, N0AN On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, 6:20 PM Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Is there a 0.2 to 0.4 or more positive offset (i.e. delay) on DT for > SuperFox

[wsjt-devel] SuperFox CY9C Initial Performance

2024-08-27 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Threshold -16 (first detection) Worked with 90 watts to an 80m OCF @ 42' center, 5' at the ends. 30m -10 my Rx SNR-04 report rx from CY9C 17m +09 my Rx SNR -03 " 12m +09 "-01 " For the 1st 24 hours I could not get a response from them (too many stronger stations call

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx_2.7.0-rc6 'fake it' with Q65

2024-09-16 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Conrad, I use Q65 every day on 6m with Fake It, and I have no trouble. I don't use Hamlib, however, I use DXCommander. (This is terrestrial, not EME) Several of the stations in our 6 meter group which meets every morning, do use Hamlib and Fake It, and report having no troubles either. 73, N0AN H

Re: [wsjt-devel] Exaggerated reports given to lower tone freqs

2021-10-16 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
The cause here for that was using Ref Spec instead of Flatten . I chased it for weeks, it has no effect on decoding, but produces silly high SNR if below 400 Hz or so. Simply uncheck Ref Spec in the Waterfall controls, and go back to "Flatten" and I bet the problem goes away. 73, N0AN Hasan On Sa

Re: [wsjt-devel] Exaggerated reports given to lower tone freqs

2021-10-16 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
n using > MSK144 mode a phase correction should be considered rather than a reference > spectrum correction if you receiver performance warrants it. Capturing a > phase correction curve is somewhat more complex as it requires a known good > MSK144 received signal rather than background no

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1

2022-06-20 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Windows 10 Pro, Core I5. 50.275 Q65 seems normal here, but we are not using EME. Our morning q65 test group completed all qsos as normal with typical strengths. All have 5 EL or larger yagis (mostly LFA) Two stations at 800+ miles with 50w and 100w output on their end. (WB4HIE, NM3G). We have

Re: [wsjt-devel] Q65 question

2022-06-30 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Hi Andrew, The easiest way to use them is consider them number of missed decodes since the last decode, if using Q65. This assumes you have Decode set to "Clear Average after Decode" , and you should have Decode = Normal and Enable Averaging set to on as well. One box is for 1st and the other box

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rigs in use #Cat_RigControl

2025-01-18 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Mike, That makes sense: if you don't want to publish your private information, then don't enable pskreporting. That is totally in the station operator's control, is it not? To expect the developers to parse which information should be sent to pskreporter is unrealistic. Most spots already include

Re: [wsjt-devel] virus found in wsjtx-2.7.0-rc8-win64.exe

2025-01-14 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Please, don't turn this into a Linux vs Windows debate, it's off topic. He needs help with Windows, not Linux. Hasan On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 7:23 AM Doug Breault, Sr. via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Ditto. Too much drama on Windows. When I was using Windows, I used t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Subject: Feature request: Output audio device selection for alert sounds

2025-04-27 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
There is no need for your feature request. WSJT-X should not be using the only audio device available to your computer, or put it another way, X should not be using the windows default audio device. Add a simple sound card usb dongle (less than $10 on Amazon). Use that for WSJT-X, use the default

Re: [wsjt-devel] v2.8.0 improved with OmniRig

2025-04-17 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Make sure you are using the right version of Omni-rig...the "unapproved" new version does not work right. 9Unapproved means, not from the author's site) 73, N0AN Hasan On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 5:14 PM Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Is anyone else seeing p

Re: [wsjt-devel] Windows compatibility WSJT-X and improved

2025-05-05 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
For anyone on a tight budget, this NUC runs WSJT-X, DXLab Suites, Browser, JTAlert, PJ Client and a host of other software, including zoom video, all at the same time, with no more than 25% CPU use (and that is peak usage during 50 decodes on FT8) It is available, new, on Amazon, priced as low as

Re: [wsjt-devel] Frequency Reporting Anomaly WSJT and FT8/FT4

2025-03-03 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
The cure for this is simple: don't touch the radio dial. Just make all frequency changes with WSJT-X. You can do this by (as Joe pointed out) 071K or in the improved version 071 (without the K if it the feature is enabled). Just remember: don't touch the radio vfo! If you make all changes in fre

Re: [wsjt-devel] Frequency Reporting Anomaly WSJT and FT8/FT4

2025-03-04 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
I don't have to ever touch the radio dial, Andy. If SpotCollector shows a spot, I double click on it and it moves me to the mode and exact freq for the qso. (DXLabs Spot Collector). It's true for cw/ssb/digital. DXLabs Suite: (they all talk to each other) DXCommander (rig control) DX SpotCollecto

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

2025-06-01 Thread Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Marco, If you want to see a shorter development cycle, look for WSJT-X Improved Plus by Uwe, DG2YCB, who is part of the development team. He produces many updates, particularly to the UI and how the code interacts with the users, many of which end up with the mainstream releases by the full team.