Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

Hash code clash most likely. Plus he’s using MSHV multi stream and not F/H because he’s using normal FT8 frequencies. Fred N2XK > On Jan 29, 2024, at 5:37 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Wondering if anyone else is seeing this issue. PJ5/SP9FIH is operating F/H. > When

Re: [wsjt-devel] Show States for Grids in the Band Activity window

Hey Ed, That’s in Uwe’s fork of WSJT-X. Fred N2XK On Jan 4, 2024, at 8:01 AM, Ed Stokes via wsjt-devel wrote:  An earlier version (2.5 or 2.6?) had an option to show states within a grid in the Band Activity window . For example: 125245 Tx 648 ~ CQ W1KOK FN33 VT NY Has this feature been

Re: [wsjt-devel] 160m S/N needs advanced mode

Glenn the new mode you want has been out for quite awhile. FST4 is that mode. However 160M ops have been slow to adopt it. I guess because it’s not a set and forget mode like FT8 is. Fred N2XK > On Dec 7, 2023, at 2:28 PM, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Hello, > > FT8 on 160m

Re: [wsjt-devel] IC-705 little to no decodes

Linux doesn’t need any drivers added. It comes with Silicon Labs USB to UART drivers already in the OS. All you have to do is add your username to the dialout group. Matter of fact there is no need to install manufacturers drivers in Windows because all they are is old versions of Silicon Labs

Re: [wsjt-devel] Extra characters in ALL.TXT for F/H

AP Decode see section 12.1 of User Guide wsjt.sourceforge.io

Re: [wsjt-devel] Memory leak in 2.7.0 rc1?

I started 2.7.0-rc1 Windows 11 Ryzen 5 task manager shows 473mb for WSJT.exe. I then closed 2.7.0-Tx1 and opened 2.6.1 task manger shows 147mb for WSJT.exe. Both were opened on a pretty quiet 6M band. I let 2.7.0-rc1 run for around 4 hours this morning with no memory leaks. My settings for

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx-2.7.0-rc1 .. QU1RK ? on Q65

False decode Fred N2XK > On May 24, 2023, at 10:34 AM, robert evans LAST_NAME via wsjt-devel > wrote: > >  > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Glenn, Why not just stop the second xmit time sequence by hitting the the Enable Tx or Halt Tx button? Then re-enable xmit by hitting the Enable Tx for the next sequence you want to xmit. After all you are the control operator for your station. Also then no changes to the code need to be made.

Re: [wsjt-devel] #Bug - Frequency Tracking Error - IC9700 (and IC-7300)

Hi Kevin, I just tested my 9700 on Q65 and FT8 and my 7300 in hound mode, FT8, Q65, MSK144 and I have no problem like you do. Do you have CV-I Transcrive turned off in the menu? If not turn off and test again. Fred N2XK On Jan 16, 2023, at 3:42 PM, Kevin McQuiggin via wsjt-devel wrote:  Hi

Re: [wsjt-devel] {wsjt-devel] v2.6.0-rc5 User Guide website

Try here since the Princeton server is down for a move for WSJT-X 2.6.0-RC5 User Guide wsjt.sourceforge.io

Re: [wsjt-devel] Operating question - replying to two stations simultaneously?

Its MSHV software that uses multi thread to be able to do that. It causes a lot of confusion because it looks like DXpedition mode in WSJT-X. Fred N2XK > On Dec 3, 2022, at 9:02 AM, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > While testing 2.6.0~RC5 I had a QSO which puzzled me. (FT8) > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stop Measure Reference Spectrum

Row of buttons between Log QSO and MonitorFredN2XK On Jul 19, 2022 2:17 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel wrote:Hi,  This is from 13.2 in the documentation: “WSJT-X provides a tool that can be used to determine the detailed shape of your receiver’s passband. Disconnect your antenna or tune

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/7/22 18:03, Fred Price wrote: >  This also might be a good idea as you stated you have a little station. Can you point out where I stated what you claim above ? My method of using FT8 is fine & effective, and I have method for repeat RR calls. M

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

When sending RR73 the other station doesn't have to reply with a 73. The reason is that the QSO is over at RR73. A lot of stations take as much and move on.If you'd like your 73 just change the RR73 to RRR by double clicking Tx 4. Doing it this way it will not log until you receive the 73. This

Re: [wsjt-devel] a priori

Thanks Reino but it's been changed then and not updated in the User Guide. I say this because I been using WSJT for a very long time (since 2001) and have never seen this behavior before 2.5.4. If it has been changed I'll just turn Enable AP off, problem solved.Oh I did see it in the RTTY Roundup

[wsjt-devel] a priori

Good morning,I'm sorry I didn't have save all turned on, so I do not have a wav file to send the development group. My operating conditions:IC7300 IC9700WSJT-X 2.5.4 with two instances running. This morning one was on 80M FT8 the other on 2M MSK144.Decode on Deep with Enable AP checkedWindows 7The

Re: [wsjt-devel] ANNOUNCEMENT: update_wsjtx_log.py released

Deficiencies? I think WSJT-X works just fine and isn't bloatware with unneeded BS.Why use your watered down version of JTAlert or Gridtracker that do so much more?On Feb 26, 2021 11:48 AM, "Dave Slotter, W3DJS" wrote:Fellow hams and users of WSJT-X:I am pleased to announce the creation and

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X bug report

Two non standard calls can not work each other. On Dec 23, 2019 9:14 AM, Zoltan Vodinszki via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi, These days I am working with a special call sign (YP3XMAS). During my work, I have observed a strange behavior when two special call-signs try to work each other or when a

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

Ya know if you so much want this why not open your computer and reprogram the interface yourself? What's it take 30 seconds to open settings or change a config? Is the DX going to disappear in that time? I guess everyone forgot about when the NA contest mode had a check box on the GUI. So many

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX Bug - RSTR / RSTS will be logged incorrectly..

Look at the white space in-between your SNR to him. He sends a SNR to a different station and it is -22. That is why the log box is incorrect. Is it a big could be but that is why there is an op present too make sure it is correct. On Nov 18, 2019 11:19 AM, Dwayne Sinclair wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Illegal auto mode?

You might also want to read 97.221 On Aug 19, 2019 1:30 PM, "David A. Behar" wrote: Hi Andy, Here is the actual text of relevant FCC rules: Automatic control. The use of devices and procedures for control of a station when it is transmitting so that compliance with the FCC Rules is achieved

Re: [wsjt-devel] Contest confusion

I have a great idea on how to solve this problem. Why don't one of you sit down at your computer and write some code so this isn't a problem any more. After all it is open source as long as you follow the GNU GPL. I'm sure the dev group has better things to do then just because some want a SNR

Re: [wsjt-devel] Contest confusion

Ed, You do know that if you are using LoTW to confirm your QSO's then all that is needed for a valid QSO is: Exchange of calls Band Date Time +/-30 minutes So it makes no difference if your signal report is a SNR or a grid square. However since it is your station it is your choice on how you

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day time problem

June 25, 2019, 06:52:55 AM CDT, Fred Price wrote: Because it seems a lot of ops want a set it and forget it piece of software. The things I read on this list that ops want WSJT to do amazes me. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.n

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day time problem

Because it seems a lot of ops want a set it and forget it piece of software. The things I read on this list that ops want WSJT to do amazes me. On Jun 25, 2019 7:31 AM, VE3FBZ wrote: Why add complexity/code to the software app when the problem is the user - not the software or the rest of the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day time problem

You are all overthinking the problem. There are programs to set your computer clock by a GPS dongle. A good plug in dongle from Amazon is $12USD and the program I use BktTimeSync is a free download. Also if the dev group keeps adding more n more WSJT will become bloatware. I'd rather see

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fox power level

Mike, They have not been using WSJT software when I have worked them. They were using multi thread. Fred N2XK On Jun 11, 2019 11:06 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: S9A has been hard to work...seems what is happening is they will call "CQ" and then answer two slots and the power drops

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug report

Mike, Here is requested in I file. Fred On Jun 2, 2019 4:46 PM, Black Michael wrote: So please send in your regular WSJT-X.ini file and the team can likely figure out the problem. Mike On Sunday, June 2, 2019, 3:45:11 PM CDT, Fred Price wrote: Mike, Stating with WSJT -r test let me run

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug report

Mike, Stating with WSJT -r test let me run RC6. Otherwise it doesn't open without the new config. Windows 7 Ultimate WSJT-X 2.1.0RC6 64 bit Thanks Fred N2XK On Jun 2, 2019 4:33 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Hmmm...64-bit version RC6 working here. Can you try starting yours with a

Re: [wsjt-devel] F/H, hound unable to transmit on even times!

Not DXPedition mode but a clone running what they call multi-thread. Just use normal FT8 to work them if they are on normal FT8 frequencies as DXPedition mode doesn't work on the normal frequencies. On Mar 2, 2019 11:39 AM, Bill Mullin wrote: New member here, forgive me if this has been asked

Re: [wsjt-devel] PJ4P Operation

On Jan 23, 2019 3:34 PM, John Zantek wrote: Has anyone observed the FT8 operation of the PJ4P expedition team? Maybe I’m missing something obvious, but…. It LOOKS they’re operating as a Fox, but on the conventional FT8 frequencies. They’re transmitting on ODD, not EVEN, so I can’t

Re: [wsjt-devel] How are guys sending their CQ Zone attached to their CQ message?

Look at the settings on the Color Tab. WSJT-X 2.0 reports more information then 1.9.1 does. The color tab settings effect this On Dec 15, 2018 9:15 AM, Michael Baker wrote: I have noticed that some are sending their CQ Zone along with their call info when calling CQ. How are they doing that?