I wrote a lengthy reply to Stephen VK3SIR post, which I just discarded.
Ultimately, I think I was adding more noise than signal.
I will say just this: I hope that everyone distributing changes to WSJT-X are
following the obligations of GPLv3, including distributing the source code. To
not do
Bill,
> you stated the above, that is indirect evidence that you have distributed a
> binary version of WSJT-X.
Indirect evidence - h ... Assumptions. Reminds me of Fleishman, Pons and
their "Cold Fusion" ...
Fact: The reference to the 891 refers to equipment at an alternate site listed
I think are now dancing on a pin here, but I think what you are talking about
is "conveyance" which has a particular meaning in this context. Let me take a
stab at it: Conveyance is "the process of transferring property from one owner
to another." It's very contextual.
One individual handing
Robert,
that's not correct. Once a binary distribution is offered, however
indirectly, to the public; the requirements to make sources available
including any modifications, to include a GPLv3 licence or compatible
one, and so on. Personal use does not incur those responsibilities.
See this
Bill:
This is more a curiosity than anything else. GPLv3 makes no distinction between
personal and non-personal use. Are you simply saying you are less bothered by a
license violation when it comes under "personal use"? What license violation do
you think is going on here? What IP do you think
On 04/06/2020 16:03, Stephen VK3SIR wrote:
I have also a background report, based off my compile, that FT-891 now
works.
Steve,
you stated the above, that is indirect evidence that you have
distributed a binary version of WSJT-X. If you have only done that to
friends with notification that
Bill,
* please do not redistribute WSJT-X, that is in breach of our copyright.
Now where on Earth did you get that idea from and where has this come from
???
Can you please provide a link to code that I have distributed?
Here again is my post:
* Hi Folks,
*
Really? Doesn't seem like the copyright notice says that.I thought WSJT-X was
GPL?
Mike W9MDB
On Thursday, June 4, 2020, 07:44:42 AM CDT, Bill Somerville
wrote:
On 04/06/2020 06:11, Stephen VK3SIR wrote:
Hi Folks,
The FT-991 now works with WSJTX 2.2.0 with Mike
On 04/06/2020 06:11, Stephen VK3SIR wrote:
Hi Folks,
The FT-991 now works with WSJTX 2.2.0 with Mike and Nate’s latest
patches. I have not fully tested split modes etc. yet though !
I have also a background report, based off my compile, that FT-891 now
works. Some will not directly post
Hi Folks,
The FT-991 now works with WSJTX 2.2.0 with Mike and Nate's latest patches. I
have not fully tested split modes etc. yet though !
I have also a background report, based off my compile, that FT-891 now works.
Some will not directly post here.
Perhaps current packaged releases should
10 matches
Mail list logo
