This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 74553 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74553/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds
At 00:39 +0200 on 07 Apr (1523061555), Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:12:50PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > Oh thanks for the quick turnaround.
> >
> > Since Tim thinks it is better to not d
flight 122025 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122025/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-amd64
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job build-amd64
testid xen-build
Tree: ovmf https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduced pr
flight 122027 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122027/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-amd64
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 74552 xen-unstable real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74552/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1
This patch is based on xen-4.10.0.
This patch introduces xenwatch multithreading (or multithreaded xenwatch,
abbreviated as 'mtwatch') on xen toolstack side.
In addition to the existing single xenwatch thread, each domU has its own
kernel thread ([xen-mtwatch-]) to process its xenwatch event.
Th
This patch is based on v4.16-rc7.
This patch introduces xenwatch multithreading (or multithreaded xenwatch,
abbreviated as 'mtwatch') to dom0 kernel. In addition to the existing
single xenwatch thread, each domU has its own kernel thread
([xen-mtwatch-]) to process its xenwatch event.
The create/
This is to introduce "xenwatch multithreading" (or "multithreaded xenwatch",
abbreviated as 'mtwatch'). The implementation of xen mtwatch involves below
components:
* dom0 linux kernel
* xen toolstack
Here are what the RFC is going to discuss:
- what is the problem
- what is the objective
- what
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 06 April 2018 18:57
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
> ; Paul Durrant ; Juergen
> Gross
> Subject: [PATCH for-4.11] x86/ioreq: Fix build from a collision of c/
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com]
> Sent: 06 April 2018 09:19
> To: xen-de...@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Razvan Cojocaru ; Paul Durrant
> ; Boris Ostrovsky ;
> Kevin Tian ; Wei Liu ; Jan
> Beulich ; George Dunlap ;
> Tim (Xen.org) ; Stefano Stabellini ;
> Andr
On 07/04/18 13:42, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 06 April 2018 18:57
>> To: Xen-devel
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
>> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
>> ; Paul Durrant ; Juergen
>> Gross
>> Subject: [PATCH for-4
On 07/04/18 13:25, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This is to introduce "xenwatch multithreading" (or "multithreaded xenwatch",
> abbreviated as 'mtwatch'). The implementation of xen mtwatch involves below
> components:
>
> * dom0 linux kernel
> * xen toolstack
>
> Here are what the RFC is going to discuss
flight 122034 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122034/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-amd64
flight 121968 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121968/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 7 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 121755
test-armhf-armhf-xl-
Hi Juergen,
On 04/07/2018 07:59 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/04/18 13:25, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>> This is to introduce "xenwatch multithreading" (or "multithreaded xenwatch",
>> abbreviated as 'mtwatch'). The implementation of xen mtwatch involves below
>> components:
>>
>> * dom0 linux kernel
this is a simple implementation of unsigned 64bits divisions
for 32 bits archs.
Signed-off-by: Paul Semel
---
common/lib.c | 21 +
include/xtf/lib.h | 4
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/lib.c b/common/lib.c
index acf4da1..36d5600 100644
--- a
flight 122036 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122036/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-armhf
On 07/04/18 18:07, Paul Semel wrote:
> this is a simple implementation of unsigned 64bits divisions
> for 32 bits archs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Semel
> ---
> common/lib.c | 21 +
> include/xtf/lib.h | 4
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/l
flight 121974 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121974/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 121272
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64
flight 121991 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121991/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail in 121949 pass
in 121991
test-amd64-amd64-qem
flight 122007 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122007/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121769
build-amd64-xsm
this is a simple implementation of unsigned 64bits divisions
for 32 bits archs.
Signed-off-by: Paul Semel
---
arch/x86/include/arch/lib.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/lib.c | 37 +
build/files.mk | 1 +
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
create
flight 122009 rumprun real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122009/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-rumprun 6 rumprun-buildfail REGR. vs. 106754
build-i386-rumprun
flight 122042 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122042/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-armhf
On 07/04/18 20:35, Paul Semel wrote:
> this is a simple implementation of unsigned 64bits divisions
> for 32 bits archs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Semel
I'm terribly sorry not to have spotted this before, but the code
actually looks rather familiar.
Grep for divmod64 in the source.
~Andrew
_
On 04/07/2018 09:53 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/04/18 20:35, Paul Semel wrote:
this is a simple implementation of unsigned 64bits divisions
for 32 bits archs.
Signed-off-by: Paul Semel
I'm terribly sorry not to have spotted this before, but the code
actually looks rather familiar.
Grep f
flight 122045 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122045/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121769
build-amd64-xsm
On 04/07/2018 10:39 PM, Andrew Cooper wrot> However, both of your
patches have (different) barrier issues, and
different (mis)uses of the shared memory clocks, which will need to be
addressed. One general comment for the full series is to not bother
trying to make time 32bits in a 32bit build
flight 122047 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122047/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-armhf
flight 122051 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122051/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121769
build-amd64-xsm
Commit 4a5733771e6f ("libxl: put RSDP for PVH guest near 4GB") breaks
pre-4.17 Linux guests since they do not use start_info's rsdp_paddr
pointer and instread scan BIOS memory for RSDP signature.
Introduce XENFEAT_rsdp_unrestricted feature flag that indicates whether
the guest can handle RSDP at l
flight 122056 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122056/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-armhf
flight 122049 xtf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122049/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xtf 1498952b2417271ac4767cbcb550bf75eba24492
baseline version:
xtf ffb046f213f3e36f6f3cc9
flight 121988 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121988/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 118324
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 122057 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122057/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121769
build-amd64-xsm
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job build-amd64-xsm
testid xen-build
Tree: ovmf https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduce
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 74556 xen-4.10-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74556/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64
flight 122066 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122066/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-armhf
flight 74557 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74557/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64 broken
build-ar
flight 122070 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122070/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121769
build-amd64-xsm
flight 121998 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121998/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 14 xen-boot/l1 fail REGR. vs. 120095
test-amd64-amd64-
Wei,
Thanks for your reply. I will revise that in the next version of the patch.
To solve the problem that the mail address I send from was not in sync the
one in the From and S-o-b. I will use another email
address(davidw...@zhaoxin.com) to resubmit my patch. If necessary, please
abando
flight 122077 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122077/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121876
build-armhf
flight 122005 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122005/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 121946
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saveresto
flight 122079 rumprun real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122079/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-rumprun 6 rumprun-buildfail REGR. vs. 106754
build-i386-rumprun
flight 122076 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122076/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 121769
build-amd64-xsm
47 matches
Mail list logo
