Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-14 Thread Romain Lenglet
> > Gilles already has a tarball of the Debian rules I used for > > packaging fusion. With minor changes, these could be used > > for a Xenomai package. One possibility is to use the rules > > and the compile farm to produce "ready to run" > > kernel/Xenomai Debian packages. > > Well, quite fr

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Paul wrote: > > Hi Philippe > > On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:24, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > - Regular automated benchmarking: What is Xenomai currently capable of, how > > stable is it, do we progress or regress over time and releases, arch by > > arch? > > Have a couple of x86 develop

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > The question is: how is the following problem solved? Where the problem is > as follows: using Posix threads in realtime requires another library than > the standard NPTL library that Linux uses (at least, I think you require > another library), but how do you make su

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
On 10/13/2005 03:33 PM Philippe Gerum wrote: > Paul wrote: >> Hi Philippe >> >> On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:24, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> >>>- Regular automated benchmarking: What is Xenomai currently capable of, how >>>stable is it, do we progress or regress over time and releases, arch by >>>

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: > >> Herman Bruyninckx wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > [...] > > - New skins: Any new colors f

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
Paul wrote: Hi Philippe On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:24, Philippe Gerum wrote: - Regular automated benchmarking: What is Xenomai currently capable of, how stable is it, do we progress or regress over time and releases, arch by arch? Have a couple of x86 development boxes running 24/7 - Co

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Paul
Hi Philippe On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:24, Philippe Gerum wrote: > - Regular automated benchmarking: What is Xenomai currently capable of, how > stable is it, do we progress or regress over time and releases, arch by > arch? Have a couple of x86 development boxes running 24/7 - Could set one

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: > [...] > >> - Drivers: Now that we have a deeply integrated port of RTDM, what's >> next? Field busses and other industrial gizmos anyone? > > > That's an interesting avenue for all our machine control oriented realtime > app

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Herman Bruyninckx
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: Herman Bruyninckx wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > [...] > > - New skins: Any new colors for the "chameleon"? > "Perfect POSIX" is, to me, more important

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
Herman Bruyninckx wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > [...] > > - New skins: Any new colors for the "chameleon"? > "Perfect POSIX" is, to me, more important than new skins. "Perfect" means, > among o

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Herman Bruyninckx
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > [...] > > - New skins: Any new colors for the "chameleon"? > "Perfect POSIX" is, to me, more important than new skins. "Perfect" means, > among other things, that the interf

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > [...] > > - New skins: Any new colors for the "chameleon"? > "Perfect POSIX" is, to me, more important than new skins. "Perfect" means, > among other things, that the interference problem with the Posix thread > libra

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Herman Bruyninckx
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote: Marco Cavallini wrote: I'd like to know (if is possible) the future plans and task schedule of fusion into xenomai project. There are things already going on "under the surface" right now, and others that would depend on everyone's input in order to

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Philippe Gerum
Marco Cavallini wrote: Hello, I'd like to know (if is possible) the future plans and task schedule of fusion into xenomai project. TIA There are things already going on "under the surface" right now, and others that would depend on everyone's input in order to start them or not. The roadmap

Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
Marco Cavallini wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to know (if is possible) the future plans and task schedule of > fusion into xenomai project. Unless I don't misunderstand your question: Xenomai _is_ fusion. Take a look at the code base, the main difference between fusion-0.9.1 and current Xenomai SVN i

[Xenomai-core] Future of fusion

2005-10-13 Thread Marco Cavallini
Hello, I'd like to know (if is possible) the future plans and task schedule of fusion into xenomai project. TIA Marco Cavallini = Koan s.a.s. - Software Engineering Linux and WinCE solutions for Embedded and Real-Time Software Klinux : the emb