Am 15.10.2010 14:47, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 01:07 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> On 10/15/2010 08:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/15/2010 01:07 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 08:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan
On 10/15/2010 08:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wro
Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan K
Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Ja
Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe,
irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a
>>>
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Philippe,
> >>
> >> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a
> >> useful testcase, the only in our portfolio t
Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe,
>>
>> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a
>> useful testcase, the only in our portfolio that targets a peripheral
>> device use case. In fact, it was only
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe,
>
> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a
> useful testcase, the only in our portfolio that targets a peripheral
> device use case. In fact, it was only of the first test cases for Native
> RTDM IIRC.
Am 09.10.2010 15:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 09.10.2010 15:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe,
irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain.
>>> Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too.
>>
>> Not by design, j
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 09.10.2010 15:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Philippe,
>>>
>>> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain.
>> Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too.
>
> Not by design, just by missing contributions to add a few more I/O binding
Am 09.10.2010 15:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe,
>>
>> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain.
>
> Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too.
Not by design, just by missing contributions to add a few more I/O bindings.
Jan
signature.asc
D
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe,
>
> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain.
Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too.
--
Gilles.
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenoma
13 matches
Mail list logo