Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-15 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 15.10.2010 14:47, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 10/15/2010 01:07 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> On 10/15/2010 08:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-15 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
On 10/15/2010 01:07 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 10/15/2010 08:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>> On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-15 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
On 10/15/2010 08:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Hi Jan, On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wro

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-14 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 14.10.2010 21:26, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 10/14/2010 09:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan K

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-14 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 14.10.2010 20:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 10/14/2010 07:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Ja

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-14 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 14.10.2010 18:16, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe, irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a >>>

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-14 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:10 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Philippe, > >> > >> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a > >> useful testcase, the only in our portfolio t

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-14 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 14.10.2010 17:42, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe, >> >> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a >> useful testcase, the only in our portfolio that targets a peripheral >> device use case. In fact, it was only

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-14 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe, > > irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. It is a > useful testcase, the only in our portfolio that targets a peripheral > device use case. In fact, it was only of the first test cases for Native > RTDM IIRC.

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-09 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 09.10.2010 15:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Am 09.10.2010 15:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe, irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. >>> Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too. >> >> Not by design, j

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-09 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 09.10.2010 15:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Philippe, >>> >>> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. >> Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too. > > Not by design, just by missing contributions to add a few more I/O binding

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-09 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 09.10.2010 15:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe, >> >> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. > > Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too. Not by design, just by missing contributions to add a few more I/O bindings. Jan signature.asc D

Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal

2010-10-09 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe, > > irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too. -- Gilles. ___ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenoma