On 19 Jun 2005, at 12:43, Jeff Buehler wrote:
> Your get system panics using the patch? Are you certain you have the
> right one - I get nothing like that at all. Perhaps you are running a
> service that uses the function (kqueue_stat in kern_event.c) and
> doesn't like it that I am not running?
Your get system panics using the patch? Are you certain you have the
right one - I get nothing like that at all. Perhaps you are running a
service that uses the function (kqueue_stat in kern_event.c) and doesn't
like it that I am not running?
Here are the modifications I use that work perfec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Jun 2005, at 14:08, Ross Gohlke wrote:
>
> > Which version of XMail?
>
> 1.21 from source.
>
> > What are outputs of: 'lsof | grep -c XMail' and '/sbin/sysctl
> > kern.openfiles'?
>
> james# lsof | grep -c XMail
> 0
> james# /sbin/sysctl ke
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Lars wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i get this answer ...
>
> server:/var/mail # telnet localhost 25
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [XMail 1.21 ESMTP Server]
> service ready; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:48:25 +0200
Did you d
I have never seen or used "mta_start_script=" - based on what you sent,
though, I doubt you are using it properly and I have no idea what the
side effects of your approach will be. My scripts in/etc/rc.d and
/usr/local/etc/rc.d start up fine without it (in 5.3. and 5.4). If it
works, though,
The good news is, XMail is finally running properly. The bad news is, I'm
not exactly sure how.
> To prevent sendmal from runnig under Freebsd, add to /etc/rc.conf the
following: "sendmail_enable = NONE". However, I don't know why
sendmail would interfere with CtrlClnt, or if it would. You
