On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
smtprelay.tab:
10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
195.60.190.0 255.255.255.0
195.60.191.0 255.255.255.0
213.178.209.0 255.255.255.0
147.123.125.0 255.255.255.0
195.60.88.128 255.255.255.128
213.136.179.21255.255.255.255
213.136.179.20
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine.
The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP
parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was a TAB in 1.24, that'd have
been parsed fine anyway. XMail would have been fetched the
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine.
The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP
parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was a TAB in 1.24, that'd have
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote:
OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this
server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not
local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services
for trikorausa.com (no email
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
we have a proble after upgrading to 1.25
a linux sendmail daemon that relay to xmail get this error:
The original message was received at Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:13:36 +0100
from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
- The following addresses
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi David -
I spoke too soon! The problem has reappeared, and consistently. So it was
NOT the line speed issue.
I will test SmartDNS settings and post the results. Presently
/etc/resolv.conf is set to the m0n0wall router on the LAN.
Are you using
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Davide -
Everything works when I use SmartDNS host to point to the same resolver
as the server uses (a m0n0wall router).
If I do not use SmartDNS host, I get the error to domains that can
receive email from other sources.
One example domain
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 15/02/2008 =E0 20:58 :
I'm relaying here a message I received about a new XMail control panel for
Windows:
I downloaded the thing and launched it.=20
Here is the installer interface :
I'm relaying here a message I received about a new XMail control panel for
Windows:
--
Hello,
I have released a free windows hosting control panel that uses xmail as
mail server.
Would you please add that to your tools section.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/windowshostingc
Regards,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
isn't the External command meanwhile obsolete ?
IMHO there is nothing you can do with it which cannot be done with filters.
Yes, you can do the same with filters. But, the code to support that is
almost zero, and I cannot cut a feature like
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 30 Jan 2008, at 23:35, David Lord wrote:
Now back to NetBSD-4.0.
I'm still unable to get local mail outgoing from NetBSD-4.0
whilst mail to public addresses seems be delivered ok.
The dns server is same for NetBSD-3.1 as for NetBSD-4.0 so I
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide
When using SmartDNSHost setting in xmail server.tab file, does xmail use the
same internal resolving algo (ask for the domain soa, then ns servers, ...,
when mx records, ...), or does it make directly (and only) the final query
(ie :
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 20 Jan 2008, at 12:34, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Give me a summary :) Should I look into it or not?
Seems way hostnames are checked is different between NetBSD-4.0
(xmail-1.25-pre16) and NetBSD-3.1 (xmail-1.25) or NetBSD-3.1 (xmail
1.25
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote:
I've still to try an earlier version of xmail on NetBSD-4.0 and also
try again with ipv6 enabled.
I think XMail is getting a ERR_DNS_NXDOMAIN (NXDOMAIN) from your DNS
server. When that's happening, XMail does not even try to fall back
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
Gotit! Must have been my fault due to some additional linebreak. The
correct modification in the makefile is:
CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -I. -I/usr/kerberos/include -D__UNIX__ -D__LINUX__
-D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DHAS_S
... written in a
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I tried to build XMail on this machine:
Linux version 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Lin
ux 3.2.3-47)) #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 23:35:44 EST 2005
... but the build process stops with
make -f
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 20 Jan 2008, at 2:43, David Lord wrote:
I've just been setting up a new server running NetBSD-4 and copied my
existing 1.25-pre25 NetBSD 3.1 directory and binaries.
'telnet localhost 25'
Allows me to connect and accepts a
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Hal Dell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:30 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: new Twist on POP3 Tail Issue?
[snip...]
Save
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello all...
Some time ago, in July of 2006, Davide wrote the xbmf post-data filter to
filter out eMail messages with the POP3 Tail Issue plus other related
issues. One place you can see Davide's posting about this is:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Radu Spineanu wrote:
Hi
It seems just as I was going to brink back online the Romanian mirror or
xmailserver.org the website went down.
Any ideas when it will be fixed?
It's fixed now. Somehow, sometimes, logrotate's `thttpd restart` fail to
bring up thttpd.
-
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 20:03, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008 20:05, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 10/01/2008 =E0 20:04 :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig paruvendu.com mx +trace
; DiG 9.4.2 paruvendu.com mx +trace
;; global options: printcmd
.. 118237 IN NS
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008 20:05, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc 0.4.4 (unix) with spamd 3.1.0 on
Bluewhite 64 simply refuses to work. As command line is not supported
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Davide Libenzi :
I will setup www.fr.xmailserver.org as CNAME of , where is the
host name that you will give me. Such host name must have a virtual server
that will accept requests for www.fr.xmailserver.org by picking up files
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Ivo Smits wrote:
Davice,
How about (read-only) rsync? I think rsync is even better than HTTP HEAD.
The site is not big, so I don't need that extra optimization. Plus, I
consume only about 40GB of the monthly 200GB I have ;)
I can host (another) mirror in The
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 07/01/2008 =E0 00:03 :
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
=20
Maybe Mihai will sort this out. All other mirrors but Italy,
Netherland and Eye-Catcher are showing 1.25.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc 0.4.4 (unix) with spamd 3.1.0 on Bluewhite
64 simply refuses to work. As command line is not supported in xspamc, no
debug is available. No message reaches spamd, no entry in XMail or xspamc
logs, the emails
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Michal A. Valasek wrote:
Hello,
I have feature request: let local mailer in Xmail support Windows Mail
Pickup Service format, in addition to its own.
Why? It seems that built-in SMTP server in Windows is going to be
deprecated. In Windows Server 2008 it must be
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
Maybe Mihai will sort this out. All other mirrors but Italy,
Netherland and Eye-Catcher are showing 1.25. Italy is still showing
1.22. May be you have to speak Italian to the webmaster. Should not be
a big problem :-)
I'm
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008 23:55, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008 20:28, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Slovenia is the best, Italy the worst and Romania seems to have
server problems !
I
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
Slovenia is the best, Italy the worst and Romania seems to have
server problems !
I need to remove Romania. The mirror is no more available AFAICT.
Maybe Mihai will sort this out. All other mirrors but Italy,
Netherland and
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 04/01/2008 =E0 00:45 :
No changes since 1.25-pre25:
http://www.xmailserver.org/ChangeLog.html#jan_3__2008_v_1_25
http://www.xmailserver.org/
Thanks Davide and Happy new year !
XMail page
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Mike Harrington wrote:
I've located a bug in 1.25... I'm not sure how far-reaching it is yet. I
can only assume it is related to the Fixed strengthened RFC address parsing.
The admin protocol allows for bad domain names to be passed in, as shown in
the example below.
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008 20:28, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Slovenia is the best, Italy the worst and Romania seems to have
server problems !
I need to remove Romania. The mirror is no more available AFAICT.
It seems
No changes since 1.25-pre25:
http://www.xmailserver.org/ChangeLog.html#jan_3__2008_v_1_25
http://www.xmailserver.org/
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Happy new year to all xmail users, and especialy to Davide.
Hope 2008 will be the year of xmail 2.0 ;)
Happy new year! Let's start with making 1.25 before :)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi Davide,
a forum user discovered that the spool's mprc folders are being trashed
with huge amount of files, when a user's mailproc.tab contains only a
single mailbox line. Would be nice if you could have a look on it.
I'll need some more
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Hi all,
Due some persistent problems with Outlook and Outlook Express with SMTP
Authentication, we are instructing some companies that uses our services to
install XMail Server internally.
But in Brazil many adsl connections uses dynamic ips
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Tjeerd Makel wrote:
Hi all,
Every now and then, my system echoes strange error messages which are
also logged in '/var/log/messages'. They look like this :
Oct 7 17:19:25 server1 XMail[551]: Invalid command WAIT in file
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Stig Østvang wrote:
Something else I just found out. When I click on Preview for the attachment
in Yahoo, it shows properly, but it's still too large... File type is
application/octet-stream.
Hmm, did you try to save it on disk and see the on-disk size? I give it
for
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stig Østvang wrote:
Hi, Davide.
Yes, I tried to save it to disk, and it was the same size as Yahoo claimed=
(145kb, original was 105kb).
I have no idea. Seems ackwardly strange.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Hi all,
since installing 1.25 I notice that when a message gets frozen
immediately because of a DNS problem there are two kinds of slog messages.
One is familiar since 1.23
ErrCode = -215
ErrString = DNS name not exist
Recipient domain
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Matic wrote:
Damn, I thought you were a wizard! :(
Seriously, i thought it might be some specific system code or whatever.
The execution was successful from a system POV (see the 0 before the
250). But your whatever was run in your filter, returned 250.
- Davide
-
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Matic wrote:
Hi,
I have moved the script from mailproc.tab to filters.in.tab to se what
would be in the filterslog
and this is it:
.. in 0 250 path to the executabale
what could cause the 250 exit code?
You ask me?!? That's the exit code of your
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Matic wrote:
hi
i have just moved one xmail server from win to linux and everything
seems to work fine. I just have one glitch with one of the filters in
mailproc
in mailproc.tab i have
mailbox
external path to bash script @@FILE (real TABs)
in bash
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Matic wrote:
I meant etc/hosts file
10.0.0.11 srv6
.
the strangest thing is that if I exec telnet 10.0.2.2 25 I get
Connected..
Escape chara.
and no xmail header
but if I press enter 2 times I immediately get the xmail header and 2 times
500 Syntax
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote:
yes, it is in private range behind NAT
Davide Libenzi pravi: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: if I connect from
anyother computer on the network or even from outside of network the header
comes up immediately so I think this is IP-hostname resolution
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing long delay before initial header and only from one
machine. All other machines with same netmask and connected to same
switch get the xmail response immediately. What could be the cause for
such behavior?
It is a DNS slowdown.
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, David Lord wrote:
I should have added that defaults for retries seem very conservative
and much safer for a production server than my values that ramp up
the period between reduced number of retries much more agressively.
Davide, please correct me if I've calculated
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote:
if I connect from any other computer on the network or even from outside of
network the header comes up immediately so I think this is IP-hostname
resolution, but htne again i have a record for this IP in xmail hosts file.
any suggestion how could I test
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Mailbox full last night ...
return -ENOPARSE;
:)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
Same problem thing this morning. Sent a message, waited 30 minutes and
it's still sitting in the queue, no SLOG file, message was sitting in
the spool just fine. Restart XMail and the message flies on through.
Is there anything strange with my
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, David Lord wrote:
Only a home server here, k6-400, NetBSD 3.1, total memory = 127 MB,
avail memory = 119 MB. I used to send a batch of 12 emails from a
remote account as test of spamassassin and fprot, 6 x connections
each to 2 accounts. Occasionally all would slowly
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your* problems
with a broken compiler. The Standard define non-local non-initialized
object to be pre-initialized with zero.
Where is this standard written? I don't know of neither
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your* problems
with a broken compiler. The Standard define non-local non-initialized
object to be pre-initialized with zero.
Please do not post those kind
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here.
I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to do relaying (no filtering of any
kind) as backup MX servers and I've never really paid much attention but
it appears that they relay received messages about
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your*
problems
with a broken compiler. The Standard define non-local non-initialized
object
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
Strange. I flushed the queue, using Haralds manager, and it shot the
message right through.
Ok, forget the tools. Let's go to the file system. Stop XMail and clean
the spool `find spool/ -type f | xargs rm -f` (if spossible - this will
nuke possible
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Haven't checked the complete docs yet, so there may remain some minor
typos. Anyway, I hope this is useful.
Thanks, applied.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
When you've got that situation where those empty directories don't all
exist (just like the documentation is warning you about), XMAIL will
sometimes treat such a situation not as the severe error it should be,
but instead ignores the
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Hi,
While hunting down another issue (to be posted shortly), I ran into this
one. Shouldn't the '' be replaced with a '||' for security reasons in
error situations? Otherwise error situations in [ONLY] ONE of the calls
(due to wrong setup
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Minor memory leaks were detected when certain errors had been reported.
Best regards,
Ger
PS: also in this fix: zeroed static data because MSVC2005 does NOT zero
static data unless specifically instructed to do so (in analysis debug
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Situation:
- Win32 [release or] debug build (yep, I use MSVC2005 project files, NOT
the makefile, but that does not make any real difference here)
- link to the DLL version of the OpenSSL library (0.9.9 tested, will
VERY probably happen
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Hi,
There's still a bug lurking in the code, but now for a fault situation
only fortunately, far as I can tell.
How to reproduce:
- use Outlook Express
- create account
- FORGET to check the checkmark 'Outgoing (SMTP) server requires
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
If you use -SI (-PI / -XI / -FI / -CI / -WI ) ip[:port] with the
optional [:port] section included to specify a non-standard port for the
ip interface address(es), you're SOL as the code calls the appropriate
routine but does not extract the
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Situation:
- Win32 [release or] debug build (yep, I use MSVC2005 project files, NOT
the makefile, but that does not make any real difference here)
- link to the DLL version of the OpenSSL library (0.9.9 tested, will
VERY probably happen
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Filip Supera wrote:
Hello,
I've got two machines running XMAIL. One has 1.24 and the other has
1.25.
I use SSL on port 465 for SMTP.
When I send a message without attachment or with small attachment (I
just tried with 3 22KO jpeg pictures), no problem.
But, if I
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Filip Supera wrote:
Seriously, in the very latest 1.25-pre series I replaced OpenSSL DLLs wit=
h=20
the new ones I built based on the latest OpenSSL release.
Are you sending from XMail to XMail, or from MUA to XMail?
From=20MUA (Thunderbird or The Bat!) with XMail
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Hi all,
apparently I have a problem with the new SysGetHostByName which
causes POP3-SMTP auth always to fail. This chainsaw patch works for me:
--- POP3Utils.cpp 2007-11-02 01:34:32.0 +0100
+++ POP3Utils.cpp.new 2007-11-16
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Ã~Xyvind Kinsey wrote:
I've used Ethereal to sniff the traffic while viewing the log, and
xmail often tries only the first time, gets greylisted, and does NOT
try to resend the emails.
I was also running in debug mode and there was nothing happening there
at the different
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Hi,
at least the latest couple of preXX tar.gz distros were lacking these files:
SSLSupport.cpp
SSLSupport.h
Main.cpp
SysDep.cpp
is this intentional and have I got my MSVC2005 projects wrong, or vice
versa?
nmake /f Makefile.win
-
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Screen output:
POP3 client connection from [127.0.0.1]
POP3 client exit [127.0.0.1]
SMTP client connection from [127.0.0.1]
PreIP='127.0.0.1' CurrIP='127.0.0.1'
SMTP filter run: Filter = C:\MailRoot\bin\glst\glst Retcode = 0
SMAIL local
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 21.34 16/11/07, you wrote:
Logs:
localhosttsd.unifi.it 127.0.0.1 2007-11-16 21:11:25
vertova LOGIN 1 614
tsd.unifi.it tsd.unifi.it 127.0.0.1 2007-11-16 21:11:25
ZOUZOU.tsd.unifi.it tsd.unifi.it
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote:
See below for a copy, COMPLETE diff/patch is attached to this reply:
Since 7z attachments get stripped, here it is in literal uncompressed
format:
The patch contains *a lot* of unecessary ZeroData() (plus other
This fixes the problem with the POP3-before-SMTP authentication:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre25.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre25.win32bin.zip
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 22.01 16/11/07, you wrote:
Cat you try to show me the content and metadata of the account's .ipconn
file?
dir C:\MailRoot\domains\tsd.unifi.it\vertova\.ipconn
Volume in drive C is unlabeled Serial number is F8F7:824F
Directory
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Hi all,
I've installed 1.25-pre22 from an hour. Looks like auth'd (SMTP after
POP3) users cannot bypass DNSBL in spite of code 0:
excerpt from today's pop3log:
dex1.tsd.unifi.it tsd.unifi.it 151.49.38.240 2007-11-15
09:30:54 xxx
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Ã~Xyvind Kinsey wrote:
Can anyone please explain to me what the following slog means?
I can verify that the xmail only tries to send two times. What can be
the cause of this?
[PeekTime] 1194809835 : Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:37:15 +0100
ErrCode = -77
ErrString = [RCPT
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
I need some help in how to understand what exactly is happening with our
XMail server.
Here we are using in server.tab:
CustMapsList
zen.spamhaus.org.:0,dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0
but some blacklisted ips are getting too
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote:
Hi all,
just got a directory listing of MAIL_ROOT/dnscache/mx. After 30 or 40
mins it reported a total of over 252,000 files. Since XMail checks
MailerDomain before CustMapsList (why?), I think they're mostly
domain files of blacklisted spam.
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide
I have a request about per IP/PORT couple :-)
I have a problem setting an xmail server on a server with only one IP.
Due to some French ISP blocking outgoing port 25, I have to open a new
receiving smtp port (587 mua-mta) to help
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
I forgot about making the new pre-release:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre20.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre20.win32bin.zip
This has the new PSYNC timeout option, and I also updated OpenSSL
binaries
This one fixes the RFC822 atom parsing and adds the new SmtpConfig-IP,PORT
option:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre21.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre21.win32bin.zip
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Since a week we could note a massive (and abnormal) smtp connections in our
XMail server (XMail 1.25 Win32 on Windows 2000 Server).
After many adjusts in XMail threads to support this DDOS, we could note an
interesting thing: Windows 2000
I forgot about making the new pre-release:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre20.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre20.win32bin.zip
This has the new PSYNC timeout option, and I also updated OpenSSL binaries
to the new version.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
I forgot about making the new pre-release:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre20.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre20.win32bin.zip
This has the new PSYNC timeout option, and I also updated OpenSSL binaries
to the new version
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Davide, how XMail handles the following situation:
SERVER SIDE
-EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 1
-Many CustMapsList configured
MUA SIDE:
-My server requires authentication *NOT* enabled
The client try to send a message (smtp) AFTER a POP3 *BUT*
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
THANKS! :-)
A new pre candidate somewhere ?
I'll try to make one this w/end
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
There should be the possibility to tweak the timeout for a pop3link
session (not the sync interval, but the time until the session is hung
up if no data comes thru). Would be very helpful on slow lines.
Your thougts ?
I added a new -YT option to
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide
I have read another time xmail server doc to find some info for spammers.tab
file and found that some clarification are needed for optional parameter
code=.
As specified in doc :
Currently supported
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] command is entered.
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but on a cellular level, I'm quite
busy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
We are trying to use some blacklists (with CustMapsList) like the following:
CustMapsList
psbl.surriel.com.:0,zen.spamhaus.org.:0,cbl.abuseat.org.:0,new.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net.:0,dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.:0,list.dsbl.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0
But, for
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
The character ` (hex 0x96) is missing in your list of the valid RFC
822 atoms. If you look at section 3.3, you will see, that it is not
part of the exclusions.
If you notice though, text, atom, qtext, dtext and quoted-pair,
all talks about CHAR
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Oliver St=F6neberg wrote:
The character ` (hex 0x96) is missing in your list of the valid RFC
822 atoms. If you look at section 3.3, you will see, that it is not
part of the exclusions.
If you notice though, text,
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Chad Fleenor wrote:
has anyone else had a problem with Xmail resending old emails (months
old) after a system reboot??
You call a filter. Filter timeouts. XMail tries to remove the spool file,
and fails. File remains inside the spool (but not in the in-memory queue).
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
Hi Davide,
I'm just trying to move an xmail setup to a win 2003 64bit server, and have
got 99% of the way.
However I find that I'm getting Blacklist (EIPMAP) errors in the smtp log,
but nothing else.
Investigations from another xmail server
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail
401 - 500 of 2421 matches
Mail list logo
