Hello,
On 4 January 2016 at 00:26, Guillem Jover <guil...@hadrons.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 13:16:21 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> It adds back functionality lost a few years ago which makes X
>> needlessly hard to use on devices that report corre
Hello,
On 10 August 2015 at 11:42, Doug Lasse yeaohyea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I gonna give you the log directly by email.
Here it is.
The log clearly shows xforcevesa argument on your kernel commandline
and X server loading the VESA driver.
The VESA driver is unaccelerated so this works as
On 6 August 2015 at 15:55, Doug Lasse yeaohyea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to you cause I have several questions about my 2 graphics card
which are VIA K8N800/K8M800/K8N800A Unichrome Pro IGP and ATI Radeon 8500.
For my VIA : I've tried openchrome and proprietary via driver but
On 12 May 2015 at 15:03, Guillaume Tucker guillaume.tuc...@arm.com wrote:
Then i run startx, i can see the desktop on the monitor.
But i found that the X process doesn't load any EGL and GLES libs by
seeing the info of /proc/X process ID/task/*/smaps file.
Most X11 desktop environments use
this?
When I loads radeon driver I've disabled Xorg at all.
On 18 October 2014 07:51, basteon bast...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
I made dmesg output from ssh connected from another host.
...
On 10/13/14, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
...
What connection do you use to connect
On 18 October 2014 08:26, basteon bast...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/18/14, basteon bast...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/13/14, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 13 October 2014 11:37, basteon bast...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
I use 2.3.3 vesa xorg driver.
But with radeon kernel
On 18 October 2014 15:49, Mateusz Jończyk mat.jonc...@o2.pl wrote:
W dniu 18.10.2014 o 10:48, Michal Suchanek pisze:
Yes, the graphics is not expected to work correctly without a firmware.
That's a severe defect of the Radeon driver since the firmware is
apparently buggy and/or the interface
Hello,
On 13 October 2014 11:37, basteon bast...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
I use 2.3.3 vesa xorg driver.
But with radeon kernel driver I got black screen and nothing more.
Just after I make modprobe -av radeon
I use GIGABYTE GA-E350N board with AMD Radeon HD 6310.
Can you connect over SSH or
On 27 September 2014 10:09, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:35:34PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
This uses fb directly, and supports DRI2 and DRI3.
The fundamental principle of UXA is that at its lowest level it is
acceleration=none. This looks to be a
On 27 September 2014 18:26, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 05:35:15PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 27 September 2014 10:09, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:35:34PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
This uses fb
On 27 September 2014 20:58, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 07:17:26PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
And the difference between UXA/none and AccelMethod none and fbdev
is supposed to be what?
s/fbdev/modesetting/
Not much. UXA/none adds in hw DRI support
On 23 January 2014 05:24, Alexander E. Patrakov patra...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/23 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com:
Andy Ritger arit...@nvidia.com writes:
* How should hotplug of the monitor's second tile be handled by the
server if it is hiding the two tiles? Should such a hotplug
On 6 October 2013 20:17, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl writes:
Is that really desirable?
It has a couple of benefits -- the first is that touch screens and touch
pads often get input while your laptop screen is closed; this prevents
that from
Hello,
I dusted off my D201GLY2 board and some old disks and found the SiS
driver that has working modestting on it.
I included some patches from the current Xorg SiS driver so it now
runs on Debian stable.
Compared to the vesa driver and it appears that vesa has better
precieved rendering
Hello,
On 14 July 2013 18:31, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Hi,
On 14 July 2013 17:17, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Make XOpenDisplay always call XInitThreads when opening a display, thus
guarding it against possible disaster scenarios like calling
XOpenDisplay
Hello,
I am using Debian which has a preinstalled package with xkb layouts.
How I am supposed to install my own layout without rolling my own package?
Looking through the xkb files there is totally non-extensible rules
file (or if it's extensible the way to extend it is undocumented).
Sure,
On 10 June 2013 21:31, Andrew galun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello. I'm new to this mailing list, and open source participation in
general, so I welcome any constructive criticism.
Hello,
can this be implemented as a gesture that works on any absolute
pointing device, not just synaptics?
I am not
On 14 April 2013 12:30, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On 13/04/13 01:34 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 12 April 2013 13:50, Alexander E. Patrakov patra...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/4/12 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net:
Hi guys,
Unfortunately, the entry for gesture
On 12 April 2013 13:50, Alexander E. Patrakov patra...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/4/12 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net:
Hi guys,
Unfortunately, the entry for gesture recognition in the synaptics driver
should have not been on the list. synaptics is the wrong place in the stack
to do
On 21 February 2013 07:17, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk writes:
Hrm. With the current system, except for override-redirect windows, if
the compositor is also the window manager, it should always know when
There are compositors that are not
On 10 January 2013 15:27, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
Michal Suchanek, le Thu 10 Jan 2013 15:20:21 +0100, a écrit :
Dummy driver sets the flag because it does not need console and then
the console is not open although evedev which requires console and
does not set
On 10 January 2013 01:30, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
Michal Suchanek, le Thu 10 Jan 2013 00:45:41 +0100, a écrit :
Just backing out HW_SKIP_CONSOLE after years of dummy driver using it
Did I ever propose that? (As a real upstream change I mean, not the
workaround
On 9 January 2013 01:33, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 09 Jan 2013 00:55:13 +0100, a écrit :
Michal Suchanek, le Tue 08 Jan 2013 22:26:50 +0100, a écrit :
Well, I hope I have made my point clear: the blind user case should
get exactly the same
On 9 January 2013 23:51, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
And I don't see that happening by default with the dummy driver.
s/happening/coming back/
Since the drivers are probed one by one in order there can be only one
flag. Two flags set by two drivers will never be set
On 8 January 2013 15:53, Timothy Meade zt.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, auto detecting if VT switch is needed means
introducing an inconsistencty. Dummy and evdev can both work without
allocating a VT, and there are cases where that may be useful, such as
debugging a
On 8 January 2013 18:07, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
Michal Suchanek, le Tue 08 Jan 2013 16:03:06 +0100, a écrit :
There is already -novtswitch option. Making a corresponding -vtswitch
would be simplest provided it overrides the HW_SKIP_CONSOLE override.
novtswitch
On 5 January 2013 02:10, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Alan Coopersmith, le Mon 31 Dec 2012 17:46:47 -0800, a écrit :
On 12/31/12 05:36 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Michal Suchanek, le Mon 31 Dec 2012 19:22:13 +0100, a écrit :
why is that patch needed?
It is quite non-obvious
Hello,
why is that patch needed?
It is quite non-obvious why would dummy driver require a console under
any circumstances. It does not render anything anywhere so does not
use console for anything.
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
On 10 December 2012 11:56, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi,
I've upload a rebranded and cleaned up version of xf86-video-tegra to a
repository on gitorious[0]. Don't get too excited, since this is really
just a fork of the modesetting driver with some unnecessary
Hello,
On 24 November 2012 22:09, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
However, that has all the usual drawbacks of a fork so I thought maybe
it would be better to write some code to xf86-video-modesetting to add
GPU-specific acceleration on top. Such code could be leveraged
On 26 October 2012 07:34, halfdog m...@halfdog.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Jackson wrote:
On 10/24/12 2:09 PM, halfdog wrote:
Could someone please point me to the documentation about best
practice when dealing with asynchronous requests on client side.
If
On 17 October 2012 03:18, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com writes:
This was necessary in DRI1 for a variety of reasons (SAREA ownership,
VRAM layout, etc). None of that is relevant to DRI2. Which is good,
because VT switch is an xf86-ism and I'd like to make
Hello,
I have these X bits installed:
ii xserver-xorg-core 2:1.12.3.902-1 amd64
Xorg X server - core server
ii xserver-xorg-input-wacom 0.15.0+20120515-1 amd64
X.Org X server -- Wacom input driver
The scrolling direction is inverted.
For non-smooth-scrolling
On 6 October 2012 18:16, Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk wrote:
On 10/06/2012 10:42 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 6 October 2012 12:32, Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk wrote:
On 10/06/2012 05:15 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
If the user is choosing a port or file path the user
Hello,
What's the advantage of that patch?
As far as I understand the patch shifts the burden of finding a free
port (or socket path) from the X server to the user.
X is in the position to atomically find a free port and grab it
whereas an user from outside of the X server will have much harder
On 6 October 2012 12:02, Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk wrote:
On 10/06/2012 04:56 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
What's the advantage of that patch?
1) You can use a socket path you create in advance, so you know for
certain that it is free when you call the server.
You then know
On 6 October 2012 12:32, Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk wrote:
On 10/06/2012 05:15 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
If the user is choosing a port or file path the user then needs to go
through the dances of determining which port or path is still
available for starting a new X server
Hello,
On 4 October 2012 11:23, Sascha Hlusiak saschahlus...@arcor.de wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by Followed by smooth scrolling. Once you
enable smooth scrolling, you don't send button 4/5 presses anymore, only
the valuator events. the rest is handled in the server. are you still
On 31 August 2012 08:24, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Simon,
Do you think you'll be able to come up with a fix for this regression
tomorrow (ie before Saturday)? If not, we should revert the change from
master before we tag 1.13 on Tuesday. I'll also revert it
On 31 August 2012 08:24, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Simon,
Do you think you'll be able to come up with a fix for this regression
tomorrow (ie before Saturday)? If not, we should revert the change from
master before we tag 1.13 on Tuesday. I'll also revert it
On 31 August 2012 11:49, Simon Schubert 2...@0x2c.org wrote:
On 08/31/2012 09:18 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 31 August 2012 08:24, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Simon,
Do you think you'll be able to come up with a fix for this regression
tomorrow (ie before
On 23 August 2012 15:14, Matt Whitlock freedesk...@mattwhitlock.name wrote:
I have an expensive wireless laser mouse. The battery is still in great
condition, but the buttons are wearing out due to heavy use. Why should I
buy a new mouse when I can easily correct for the hardware in
Ping?
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On 6 August 2012 11:50, Aaron.Chen 陈俊杰 aaron.c...@siliconmotion.com wrote:
We've updated the configuration for compiling because the change of source
code.
Again, when introducing source changes requires build system changes
those should be introduced in one patch. This renders this patch
Hello,
thanks for working on this.
Some of the earlier patches look passable
but this patch is clearly bogus.
Also no need to CC me on these series, I am not a X developer nor do I
have any SMI hardware on which I would test these patches.
On 1 August 2012 11:48, Aaron.Chen 陈俊杰
Hello,
On 1 August 2012 11:41, Aaron.Chen 陈俊杰 aaron.c...@siliconmotion.com wrote:
Hi,
From 7b54308ec7f2d7f2515298aa2989ea21a89161ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Chen aaron.c...@siliconmotion.com
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:58:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] new driver initial patch 3
Hello,
trying to send updated patches again.
There is not much actual code in common due to the use of the list
macros in this new series.
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Ordering of sibling modules is internal to the loader implementation.
Unloading siblings following the requested module in the sibling list
leads to unexpected unloading of seemingly random modules.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c |6
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c |2 +-
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.c | 23 ++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c
index
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Globals.c |2 --
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c | 41 ---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86InPriv.h |4
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.h |3 ++-
hw/xfree86/doc/ddxDesign.xml
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c |7 +++
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.c |4
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Helper.c
index 187cf1f..350b089 100644
--- a/hw
* Add CanUnloadModule
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/loader/loaderProcs.h |5 +
hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c | 42 ++-
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/loader
On 18 July 2012 11:50, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 July 2012 21:09, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11
On 20 July 2012 11:56, Aaron.Chen 陈俊杰 aaron.c...@siliconmotion.com wrote:
Hi MattMichal,
Thank you for your advice. We are updating our codes in order to submit the
source code successfully.
We are doing the following changes. Next patch will be in the end of this
month. (by the way,
On 17 July 2012 10:31, Aaron.Chen 陈俊杰 aaron.c...@siliconmotion.com wrote:
Hi Matt,
We really appreciate your advice! The project is very important to us! We
have worked for the project for two years. It can support all the SMI
graphics chips and works OK on FC, SUSE, Ubuntu Red Hat, etc.
On 16 July 2012 21:09, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
can this be used to start an X server with dummy driver as output and
a real card for rendering?
No.
And what is so different about dummy compared
On 11 July 2012 08:46, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:45:21PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c | 19 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions
On 11 July 2012 08:50, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:30:02PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
urgh, no. why does the caller need to care about the module count at all?
the
input code should just call unload and let the loader sort it out.
urgh
Hello,
can this be used to start an X server with dummy driver as output and
a real card for rendering?
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info:
On 10 July 2012 03:02, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
If failing to disable a protocol specified by -nolisten failed, we'd
throw a FatalError and bomb startup entirely. From poking at xtrans, it
looks like the only way we can get a failure here is because we've
specified a protocol
On 10 July 2012 14:34, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Hi,
On 10 July 2012 12:43, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 July 2012 03:02, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
If failing to disable a protocol specified by -nolisten failed, we'd
throw a FatalError
Unless, of course, you have the x server which has the bug that it
does not disable touches of devices which are to be disabled.
There have been patches for that recently.
Thanks
Michal
On 8 July 2012 01:14, Cedric Sodhi man...@gmx.net wrote:
Besides, the problems remain after subsequently
:00 2001
From: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:22:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] xfree86/loader: Do not unload sibling modules.
To: xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Ordering of sibling modules is internal to the loader implementation.
Unloading siblings following the requested
Hello
On 22 June 2012 03:55, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
sending the patch witch should fix issue with unloading sibling
modules along with a couple of patches that allow actually unloading
modules
On 25 June 2012 16:19, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 06/25/12 02:38 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
thanks for these patches.
These will hopefully quiet valgrind complaints about garbage.
Yes, that was another motivation - it should help silence a lot of false
Hello,
what should be hotpuggable with these?
Are all GPUs hotpugged on start with the AutoAddGPU enabled?
Or can I plug multiple cards, disable some in /sys and have them
hotplugged by X when I re-enable them?
I am not sure actually plugging cards is a good idea. PCIe is
technically
Hello,
sending the patch witch should fix issue with unloading sibling
modules along with a couple of patches that allow actually unloading
modules.
I can unload a wacom module when wacom tablet is unplugged.
Tested on X 1.12 as master requires some libraries I don't have to build.
The part
Hello.
There has never been any security in the X protocol beyond the
connection authentication.
You have not been told it was removed because it has not, there has never been.
There is some stuff in place that discriminates remote and local
clients and forbids remote clients doing some stuff
BTW does the driver work?
Last time I tried it failed miserably when running the driver on Linux/Linux.
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info:
Hello,
The patch just enables unloading modules. That is the right thing to do IMHO.
If unloading siblings is not expected then it should not be done. That
is not something this patch introduced, it has been there unnoticed
for years.
Thanks
Michal
Hello,
I don't see why the unload hunk can't be backed out separately.
It's just something that I found when looking at the loader.
As for fixing the sibling unloading - the siblings are a FIFO so you
should unload only the top one, the first loaded. This can be fixed in
the driver. Try one IO
On 4 June 2012 05:25, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
Michal Suchanek (1):
Fix crash for motion events from devices without valuators
Siddhesh Poyarekar (1):
xkb: Allocate size_syms correctly when width of a type increases
Hello,
what you seem to want is device exclusion so that input from one
device precludes events from other devices to be processed.
As XI has support for disabling devices this should be doable with a
user program so long as a user program can get proximity events
reliably.
I don't think this
ping?
0001-Fix-yet-another-crash-in-pointer-event-queuing.patch
Description: Binary data
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On 26 May 2012 00:05, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:45:59 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 24 May 2012 04:42, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
what is the trigger for this again? Is this the warp pointer case?
Attaching console output
On 24 May 2012 04:42, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
what is the trigger for this again? Is this the warp pointer case?
Attaching console output.
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives:
Hello,
So it's there again on 1.12 branch.
Something dereferences valuator without checking it exists.
Attaching patch
Thanks
Michal
0001-Fix-yet-another-crash-in-pointer-event-queuing.patch
Description: Binary data
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org:
On 23 May 2012 06:34, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On 18/05/12 21:17 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 18 May 2012 12:40, Peter Huttererpeter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On 18/05/12 19:26 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 18 May 2012 01:14, Peter Huttererpeter.hutte...@who-t.net
On 15 May 2012 18:53, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
this is the remainder of the patches to remove X server redundant
declaration.
Some were merged, some addressed in a Xi patch series by Peter Hutterer.
The fontproto one was supposedly discussed already but can't find where.
On 18 May 2012 01:15, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:15:25PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 17 May 2012 10:56, Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Ernst Sjöstrand wrote:
What if you set up a Gerrit
On 18 May 2012 01:14, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Ernst Sjöstrand wrote:
Hi,
(sorry for jumping in from the outside and breaking the thread!)
I read about this problem and wanted to offer a suggestion!
What if you set up a Gerrit
On 18 May 2012 12:40, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On 18/05/12 19:26 , Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 18 May 2012 01:14, Peter Huttererpeter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Ernst Sjöstrand wrote:
Hi,
(sorry for jumping in from the outside
On 18 May 2012 17:38, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that a tool that allows you to see diffs in a web interface
and do point-and-click defect submission would never hurt. As long as
it doesn't interfere with existing processes (too much).
Of course it interferes with
On 17 May 2012 10:56, Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Ernst Sjöstrand wrote:
What if you set up a Gerrit server for git.freedesktop.org?
When you have a social problem and try to handle it with technology,
you end up with two problems.
On 27 August 2011 01:32, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:14:39 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
However, actually fixing the bugs revealed by testing might.
Having the screen pixmap never change during the server operation isn't
a bug, it's
Hello,
On 15 May 2012 06:20, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:39:24AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
diff --git a/dix/enterleave.h b/dix/enterleave.h
index 729059b..c937c0e 100644
--- a/dix/enterleave.h
+++ b/dix/enterleave.h
@@ -60,9 +60,6 @@ extern
On 15 May 2012 12:38, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:18:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
On 15 May 2012 06:20, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:39:24AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
diff --git a/dix
On 15 May 2012 13:31, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:17:26PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 15 May 2012 12:38, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:18:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
On 15 May
Hello,
this is the remainder of the patches to remove X server redundant declaration.
Some were merged, some addressed in a Xi patch series by Peter Hutterer.
The fontproto one was supposedly discussed already but can't find where.
On 15 May 2012 17:03, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:41:23 +0200, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
wrote:
How are you going to change screen resolution without changing the
pixmap?
The pixmap structure gets rewritten with new contents.
Indeed, the pixmap
Hello,
since I cannot send bulk email you can review the following patches in
this branch:
http://repo.or.cz/w/xserver/hramrach.git/shortlog/refs/heads/noredecl
branch noredecl of git://repo.or.cz/xserver/hramrach.git
0001-Xext-remove-redundant-declarations.patch
On 14 May 2012 14:37, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
since I cannot send bulk email you can review the following patches in
this branch:
http://repo.or.cz/w/xserver/hramrach.git/shortlog/refs/heads
On 6 May 2012 18:51, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
so as part of hotplug I've started to specify a provider object to
basically represent a GPU.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~airlied/randrproto/commit/?h=providerid=670d2762a5c92da778fc3be4ad5a6b952e4f4027
The idea of a provider
On 26 April 2012 07:20, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:02:29PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
From c3b73397fce271cefac7a72d5be498aed516dc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:28:07 +0200
Subject
Hello,
what else needs to be patched to build on mingw?
I could test this if it was a full patchset but have no opinion
whasoever configure changes for platform I don't know.
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives:
On 24 April 2012 20:44, Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Michal,
Either your email client or my thunderbird is munging the patch
attachments. They aren't coming across correctly here.
However, even if they were, it is hard to review patches as attachments.
Please send
Hello,
since ccb3e78124fb05defd0c9b438746b79d84dfc3ae the test makefile
references .. rather than $(top_srcdir).
This does not work.
Please fix
Thanks
Michal
0001-xserver-Fix-out-of-tree-build.patch
Description: Binary data
___
On 20 April 2012 01:54, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com wrote:
Regression from: b8d0d19a6d410776b53a41e7cae90f68d4b22bb7
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Tested-By: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg
On 23 April 2012 14:12, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 April 2012 01:54, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com wrote:
Regression from: b8d0d19a6d410776b53a41e7cae90f68d4b22bb7
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Tested-By: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
which is
probably the intended result ;-)
Tested-By: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
