On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:09 AM Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> These two are orthogonal. "amalgamation" is building sqlite from a
> single source file for performance and simplicity reasons, which is
> what yocto does as well, despite there being no mention of it in the
> recipe. Enabling or
I need to enable SQLITE_ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT and while researching
how to do that I read the "amalgamation" needs to be rebuilt. Sqlite site
gives instructions on how to do that but I was wondering if this is really
necessary in a yocto environment. I did some searches in recipies and the
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Brian Hutchinson <b.hutch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I restored the original version of /etc/udev/scripts/mount.sh and now
> that I've cleared the "dirty bit" with the newer version of fsck.fat
> on my Ubuntu box ... inserting the USB driv
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Brian Hutchinson <b.hutch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN
>> Starting check/repair pass.
>> Starting verification pass.
>> /dev/sdb1: 284 files, 60465/62894 clusters
>
> Another update. After se
> dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN
> Starting check/repair pass.
> Starting verification pass.
> /dev/sdb1: 284 files, 60465/62894 clusters
Another update. After seeing guys on the Raspberry Pi forums
complaining about a similar thing they hinted that dosfstools was tool
old. Sure enough,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Brian Hutchinson <b.hutch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the USB drive is cold plugged (inserted before power on) it mounts
> fine, it is only a hotplug that results in the message "Volume was not
> properly unmounted. Some data may be corr
If the USB drive is cold plugged (inserted before power on) it mounts
fine, it is only a hotplug that results in the message "Volume was not
properly unmounted. Some data may be corrupt. Please run fsck"
The drive is mounted under /run/media/sdb1 but a listing of the
directory just shows strange
On Jul 1, 2015 7:34 AM, Stanciu, Alin alin.stan...@spirent.com wrote:
Hello,
I would simply like to know how to obtain a list of all software
packages/products (basically all applications) running in my Yocto build.
Can this be done via a recipe? How can I find out whether my build has a
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Stanciu, Alin alin.stan...@spirent.com wrote:
Thank you Brian, this is very useful.
I don’t have either opkg or dpkg installed so I’m using rpm. It’s useful in
the sense I can get comprehensive information on all packages installed, as
well as all files for
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2015-06-09 9:12 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2015-06-09 9:12 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2015-05-19 07:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2015-05-19 07:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 14, 2015 6:08 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:35:20AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 14, 2015 6:08 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 14, 2015 6:08 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:35:20AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote
On May 14, 2015 6:08 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:35:20AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide
what you
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide
what you need (but since it doesn't build anything, there is
no abi .. and no modules can be built against it) .. so the
error isn't graceful.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide
what you need (but since it doesn't build anything
On Nov 8, 2014 9:02 AM, Dean d...@ripperd.com wrote:
So I am using core-image-minimal and trying to shrink things as much as
possible for boot speed. I wrap the bitbake command in some other commands
to basically extract the image and then attach it to a kernel as a ramdisk.
So the size of the
On Nov 8, 2014 9:23 AM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 8, 2014 9:02 AM, Dean d...@ripperd.com wrote:
So I am using core-image-minimal and trying to shrink things as much as
possible for boot speed. I wrap the bitbake command in some other commands
to basically extract
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2014 16:01:44 Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote:
Recently I came across a build issue when using daisy branch
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2014 16:01:44 Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote:
Recently I came across a build issue when using daisy branch.
ports/linux/xattr/portdefs.h:1:24: fatal error: attr/xattr.h: No such
file
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/2014 21:09, Nicolas Dechesne nicolas.deche...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, but:
1. I don't think package-index
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
If you want license and version information, probably the best place to
get that is the automatically produced license manifest for the image:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
The point is, there is a file
tmp/deploy/licenses/image_name-datestamp/license.manifest which
contains
a list of all installed packages, their version, their license and the
recipe
they were produced by.
Hi,
I've seen the bitbake -g command that lists the packages in an image:
bitbake -g *image* cat pn-depends.dot | grep -v -e '-native' | grep -v
digraph | grep -v -e '-image' | awk '{print $1}' | sort | uniq
... but for documentation I need to generate this list with package version
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Christian Ege k423...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've seen the bitbake -g command that lists the packages in an image:
bitbake -g image cat pn-depends.dot | grep -v -e '-native' | grep
-v digraph | grep -v -e '-image' | awk '{print $1}' | sort | uniq
...
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
do_install is the task that installs. If your makefile has an install
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Brian Hutchinson
b.hutch
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
Heh :) The issue there is that the patterns are matched in the order of
the PACKAGES variable. The first package to include a file gets it, and
${PN}-dev is in PACKAGES before ${PN}. By emptying FILES_SOLIBSDEV, that’ll
Hi,
I appear to be having the same problem this guy had:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2013-June/009017.html
I'm trying to build a Makefile based project (not autotools) that just
generates a shared library. When I bitbake my recipe I get a -dev and -dbg
.ipk package but not
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
do_install is the task that installs. If your makefile has an install
target, you’d define a do_install that runs it. But not all makefiles
provide an equivalent to automake’s DESTDIR, which is why we don’t provide
a
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Laurentiu Palcu
laurentiu.pa...@intel.comwrote:
^
This commit:
commit 39356f622d3d2226f12c4930beeaf4b392d90ca5
Author: Konrad Scherer konrad.sche...@windriver.com
Date: Thu Oct 17 10:17:20 2013 -0400
relocate_sdk.py: Allow script to
On Oct 30, 2013 9:36 AM, Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@intel.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:19:56AM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Laurentiu Palcu
laurentiu.pa...@intel.com
wrote:
^
This commit:
commit
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@intel.com
wrote:
Helps to read the release notes ... I wonder if I shouldn't also make
folks
with these older Centos boxes also install buildtools-tarball so
everyone has
the same rev of Python etc. That might make the
On Oct 30, 2013 10:45 AM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Laurentiu Palcu
laurentiu.pa...@intel.com wrote:
Helps to read the release notes ... I wonder if I shouldn't also make
folks
with these older Centos boxes also install buildtools
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Christian Gagneraud chg...@gna.org wrote:
I got these ones as well (using poky, meta-oe, meta-ti and meta-qt5 all on
Dylan), good to hear they are harmless.
Thanks,
Chris
Hi,
I hate to revive an old thread but I still see the same kind of thing with
Hi,
I tried to research this issue I'm seeing but hit a bunch of noise. I
generated a Yocto 1.5 sdk with my image and -c populate_sdk for i686. When
a collegue tries to install the sdk on his Centos box with Python 2.6.7, he
gets:
sudo
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I tried to research this issue I'm seeing but hit a bunch of noise. I
generated a Yocto 1.5 sdk with my image and -c populate_sdk for i686. When
a collegue tries to install the sdk on his Centos box
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I need mgetty and don't see it anywhere in any of the OE core based
layers. Did something replace it? I'm trying to migrate some OE classic
work to OE core based distros.
Regards,
Brian
Ping! I'll take
On Aug 28, 2013 4:39 PM, Peter A. Bigot p...@pabigot.com wrote:
On 08/28/2013 03:19 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I need mgetty and don't see it anywhere in any of the OE core based
layers. Did something
Hi,
I need mgetty and don't see it anywhere in any of the OE core based
layers. Did something replace it? I'm trying to migrate some OE classic
work to OE core based distros.
Regards,
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
is this officially supported by the Yocto project? I would not like to use
Yocto for my own purposes if it is something unsupported, and I would need
to put a significant investment into to it to make the releases
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
1) Is that really from sourcery?
2) What documentation?
3) BTW, the question was whether sourcery is officially supported.
Yocto's default action is to build the toolchain from source and no it
isn't Code Sourcery if that is
Hi,
I'm using master branch of Yocto and meta-ti (and meta-openembedded).
I built meta-toolchain for beaglebone machine type and then I went into my
local.conf and changed sdkmachine to i686 as I need both 64bit 32bit
toolchains. After modifying my local.conf I ran bitbake meta-toolchain
again
... thought I'd give an update. I switched all branches to use master and
I was able to build packages from meta-networking (and others) just fine.
Thanks again for straightening me out!
Regards,
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 10:36:46 Brian Hutchinson wrote:
... thought I'd give an update. I switched all branches to use master
and
I was able to build packages from meta-networking (and others) just fine
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
Did you perhaps build meta-toolchain and then change MACHINE and build it
again? What happened prior to this build?
I ran bitbake meta-toolchain and when that was complete I edited my
local.conf
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
On Tuesday 16 July 2013 17:06:46 Brian Hutchinson wrote:
What is the right way of adding the meta-networking to Yocto? I'm
obviously not doing something right.
At the poky directory level, I
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wednesday 17 July 2013 08:56:34 Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Thanks Paul, I worried about mixing branches since I've never tried that
before. The only reason I picked Denzil is because I need ti816x support
Hi,
What is the right way of adding the meta-networking to Yocto? I'm
obviously not doing something right.
At the poky directory level, I cloned meta-openembedded. I then tried to
go to my build's local.conf and adding meta-networking and meta-oe layers
and I'm getting a dependency message
-openembedded to layers dir, I did it in the
same dir as poky ... maybe that is my problem.
Regards,
Brian
On Jul 16, 2013 5:19 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 07/16/2013 02:06 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Hi,
What is the right way of adding the meta-networking to Yocto? I'm
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Zhang, Jessica jessica.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Actually I talked with Richard regarding retiring the toolchain targets
(meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-gmae) as Mark mentioned that now we can
build a toolchain matching the image. Also, we're continue
Hi,
I'm trying to spin a toolchain (Poky 1.1) for x86 target that contains
sysroot we need to link our apps against. The bitbake of
meta-toolchain worked fine (but no sysroot) but bitbake
meta-toolchain-sdk fails one some gnome-doc-utils stuff that looks
like:
| warning: failed to load
Here is more context for the curious:
NOTE: package gnome-doc-utils-0.20.6-r5: task do_compile: Started
ERROR: Function 'do_compile' failed (see
/home/hutch/ion-u/yocto/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/gnome-doc-utils-0.20.6-r5/temp/log.do_compile.13516
for further information)
ERROR: Logfile of
OK, I killed my shell somehow so I kicked off the build again in a
fresh new shell and got a slightly different failure (look like a
segfault this time) but still on gnome-doc-utils:
NOTE: Running task 2539 of 3592 (ID: 1796,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
I really don't see what the issue is here. If you want a stable
branch, we can look into creating such a thing upstream, though I'm
personally of the opinion that master should remain release-quality,
and make better use
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions in
oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
I'd like to know this myself because I need to build 64bit 32bit
toolchains (meta-toolchain) and currently I can only get
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Monk, Roger r-m...@ti.com wrote:
I don't think it is worth spending too much time debugging this, since this
version of syslink is pretty old now and there will likely be further issues
in this environment even if we can can get th build to complete, since
Oops, hit return too quick on auto completion of email address ...
this was meant for meta-ti list!
Please forgive me and sorry for the noise.
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Somehow they managed to convince Broadcom to release a datasheet for the
SoC: http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/615
One of my friends sent me a funny quote he saw today:
The most amazing thing about this device is the
I would be interested in working on a BSP / distro if anyone is working
on it or would like to work on it.
Yes, I'm on the list to get one (from Nokia's QtonPi program) end of
Feb. and plan to use Yocto.
Regards,
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
Update,
I'm still not doing something right. I did a clean rebuild of
core-image-base and a tar jtvf core-image-base-beagleboard.tar.bz2
reveals opkg stuff in /var/lib/opkg only. No opkg bin.
I guess I'm still in shock over this. I mean why should I have to do
anything other than:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
weather you want online (on device) package management is a different story
OK, I want to hear that story :)
Regards,
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
On 2012-01-26 09:36, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Because you asked to build an absolutely minimal root file system.
In this case, it's expected that you don't want to have opkg available.
If you still want this very minimal
Hi,
Looking for the evtest package in Yocto. Is there a meta data layer I
can checkout that has it?
Regards,
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Jack Mitchell m...@communistcode.co.uk
wrote:
The way I tend to tackle this is to copy the recipe from meta-oe into my own
custom layer. The recipes in meta-oe aren't explicitly compatible with the
recipes in Yocto so I tend to only transfer over the ones that
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jack Mitchell m...@communistcode.co.uk wrote:
Hi Brian,
Your best bet is to adapt the one from meta-oe here:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-support/evtest
Hi Jack,
I'm still trying to get up-to-speed on how to work with
Hi,
I set my conf up to build .ipk packages but then I noticed that I
don't have opkg! Working with Beagleboard and running core-image-base
from master branch.
All of my searches turned up info about he ADT.
Regards,
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
The beagle board would be building on the branch listed in the
meta-yocto layer.
KMACHINE_beagleboard = yocto/standard/beagleboard
Everything that you've done is fine, but pushing your changes to
master
OK, hate to bring this up again but I must be doing something wrong.
My kernel changes don't appear to be getting picked up. I thought it
was OK before but then I did some real work on the kernel and that is
when I realized something isn't right.
To recap from the previous emails, I'm following
Hey Koen, good to hear from you. My next step is to bring meta-ti. I've
been following that list so I hope to get things working with it soon.
Regards,
Brian
From Droid Incredible
On Jan 15, 2012 3:47 AM, Koen Kooi k...@beagleboard.org wrote:
Op 11 jan. 2012, om 21:57 heeft Brian
Yet another follow up. I finally found my C3 Beagleboard and the
default kernel built off master yesterday works on that platform too.
I was able to do another build with the tips you guys gave and it
looks like it is picking up the kernel from my local git repo now. I
did the calibrate example
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
The bitbake AUTOREV code should take care of updating the clone
of your local repo in downloads/git2. I take it that this isn't
happening ?
... haven't tried ... was just sticking to the example in the
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jack Mitchell m...@communistcode.co.uk
wrote:
Brian,
What image are you building, as I cannot get core-image-minimal to boot at
all on my xM. I am currently trying to fix a hosed sd card (who knows what
happened to it!) and then I will see if it has made any
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
I prefer to work this way, since managing patches in a source git
repository is much easier for me. If you only have a few patches,
then they can just be pushed on top and added to the SRC_URI, but
you'd be
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
Funny how things tend to arrive in bunches. We just discussed this today
Ha! Thanks Jim for making me feel better at least I wasn't the
only one that had trouble ;-)
Brian
Hi,
I followed the example in the Yocto Project Development Manual for
setting up a local kernel repo and it didn't go so well.
A month or two ago I checked out Edison and was able to build all the
images required for Beagleboard and it booted fine (using command line
... not hob. Tried hob but
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
It will. I sent patches recently to make that the preferred version
in the master branch. Cherry picking that change would probably
be all you would need.
2. Is the example for setting up for kernel
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
Just so I'm clear. You are asking about the switch to 3.0 as the
default ? If so, that was only done in master for the upcoming 1.2
release and not on the edison branch, so you wouldn't pick it up
by pulling.
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
Just so I'm clear. You are asking about the switch to 3.0 as the
default ? If so, that was only done in master for the upcoming 1.2
release and not on the edison branch, so you wouldn't pick it up
by pulling.
Thanks! I did a git checkout -b master
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
Starting kernel ...
Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.
Yocto (Built by Poky 6.0) 1.1+snapshot-20120111 beagleboard ttyO2
beagleboard login: root
root@beagleboard:~# ls
root@beagleboard:~#
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote:
In meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf there's a line which sets:
PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= 2.6.37+git%
Which is then overridden for the qemu machines to:
PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto_qemuppc ?= 3.0%
If you add
85 matches
Mail list logo
