On Dec 12, 2007 12:25 PM, William Reising <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use BusySync. It works great for sharing calendars with my wife. The
> only drawback is that it only works with Macs on the same local network.
I still wish there was some way to sync Yojimbo on the LAN vs .Mac,
which simply
I use BusySync. It works great for sharing calendars with my wife. The
only drawback is that it only works with Macs on the same local network.
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Adrian Ross wrote:
On 12/12/2007, at 6:13 AM, Robert DeLaurentis wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Andrew Janjigian
Steve Kalkwarf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07-12-11 11.51
Ah, but the problem (for us) with that is that we want to share
calendars & contacts, so separate accounts are no good.
What we do in our house is cross-publish calendars. I tried all
sorts of evil tricks to allow my calendars to be multi-writ
On 12/12/2007, at 6:13 AM, Robert DeLaurentis wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Andrew Janjigian wrote:
Ah, but the problem (for us) with that is that we want to share
calendars & contacts, so separate accounts are no good.
I have not tried it, but Leopard's address book allows sharing and
> The way all the parts are wired together, using .Mac and more
> than 1 Library is a non-starter.
That's what I figured.
>
> You might be better served with a .Mac family license, allowing
> you and your wife to keep separate Libraries and sync states.
Ah, but the problem (for us) with that is
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Andrew Janjigian wrote:
Ah, but the problem (for us) with that is that we want to share
calendars & contacts, so separate accounts are no good.
I have not tried it, but Leopard's address book allows sharing and
edits by multiple users. Perhaps that would help.
You might be better served with a .Mac family license, allowing
you and your wife to keep separate Libraries and sync states.
Ah, but the problem (for us) with that is that we want to share
calendars & contacts, so separate accounts are no good.
What we do in our house is cross-publish calenda
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Andrew Janjigian wrote:
However, I would still like it if you could have more than one YJ
library at a time (and sync them all over a single dotmac account) so
that my wife and I could have separate buckets. Given that individulal
dotmac accounts are probably very o
However, I would still like it if you could have more than one YJ
library at a time (and sync them all over a single dotmac account) so
that my wife and I could have separate buckets. Given that individulal
dotmac accounts are probably very often used by families of users,
this seems a reasonable
It took me awhile to get used to the "one-bucket" system at first, but
once I did, it is now second nature. I prefer having everything in one
place now.
However, I would still like it if you could have more than one YJ
library at a time (and sync them all over a single dotmac account) so
that my w
Here's my question about Yojiimbo. If I'm understanding right,
there's essentially only one database for the Yojimbo
application. Even if I want to use Yojimbo to "catalog" stuff
for several very different things, they will all be together
when I open Yojimbo. However, I can tag them separatel
On 11.12.2007, at 12:54, Dennis Bretz wrote:
Here's my question about Yojiimbo. If I'm understanding right,
there's essentially only one database for the Yojimbo application.
Even if I want to use Yojimbo to "catalog" stuff for several very
different things, they will all be together when I
12 matches
Mail list logo
