** No longer affects: null
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
Title:
Blacklist API sucks
Status in Unity:
Invalid
Status in Unity Files Lens:
** Branch linked: lp:~zeitgeist-packagers/zeitgeist/debian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
Title:
Blacklist API sucks
Status in NULL Project:
** Changed in: null
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
Title:
Blacklist API sucks
Status in NULL Project:
Invalid
** Branch unlinked: lp:~manishsinha/zeitgeist/fix-blacklist-api
** Branch linked: lp:~manishsinha/zeitgeist/new-blacklist-implementation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
** Changed in: unity-place-files
Status: Triaged = Invalid
** Changed in: unity
Status: Triaged = Invalid
** Changed in: unity-place-files (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which
** Changed in: unity
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: unity-place-files (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Milestone: 0.7.0 = 0.8.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
Title:
Blacklist API sucks
Status in NULL Project:
Triaged
After re-reading this bugreport, the discussion it includes and the merge
proposal, I'm still not confident that the API which is proposed here is good
enough. This is why I started working on a blacklist API spec.
It is still work in progress, and I'm not sure if this points in the right
On 6 January 2011 10:43, Markus Korn thek...@gmx.de wrote:
After re-reading this bugreport, the discussion it includes and the merge
proposal, I'm still not confident that the API which is proposed here is good
enough. This is why I started working on a blacklist API spec.
It is still work
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Seif Lotfy
612...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
While I actually like Markus's proposal alot (kudos on the awesome work) I
am kind of hesitant on the BlacklistTemplateIdentifier. I feel more
comfortable using an identifier like actor/#uid as in
My first idea related to RegEx based matches was that I thought we need
something very powerful there. But maybe I'm wrong, So I'm happy to
change my proposal there and only allow prefix-search and negation. And
if we need something more powerful later on we can always change it.
--
You received
@Siegfried, how do you want to identify a template in the collection of
all templates, for example, what do you propose as an argument for the
RemoveTemplate() method?
Do you want automatically generated identifier (e.g. auto-integer-id,
maybe in combination with sender string)? or do you have a
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
Title:
Blacklist API sucks
Status in NULL Project:
So the final consensus is that the parameter s is any randomly chosen
identifier for an application.
* GetBlacklists() - ({sE})
* AddBlacklist(sE) -- Changed(sE)
* RemoveBlacklist(sE) -- Changed(sE)
I changed the name to Blacklist instead of Template for the method names
as it sounds better and
** Project changed: unity = null
--
Blacklist API sucks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
Status in NULL Project: Triaged
Status in Unity Files Place:
Let 'E' define the event dbus signature.
Methods:
- GetTemplates() - ({sE})
- AddTemplate(s, E)
- RemoveTemplate(s)
Signals:
- Changed({sE})
Apps would use their normal namespaced bus names to construct blacklist
names.
Like 'org.gnome.Epiphany.PrivateBrowsing' for the blacklist
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Milestone: 0.7.0 = None
--
Blacklist API sucks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
Status in Unity: Triaged
Status in Unity Files
** Changed in: unity
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: unity
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Also affects: unity-place-files
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unity-place-files
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: unity-place-files
Status:
At some point people will need to blacklist over Unity. I think that should be
taken in consideration in the new design and development cycle.
Example: What if I don't want my .py files to show up in Unity
** Also affects: unity
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Blacklist API
with only a week left and no decision on the development method and API
I postponed the bug to 0.7
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Milestone: 0.6 = 0.7
--
Blacklist API sucks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework
thekorn it sucks, maybe. but do we need a new API for this, that's what I'm
not sure about
seiflotfy thekorn, u can see mhr3 and kamstrup got into the details of it
seiflotfy they wrote the whoel api actually
m4n1sh_ seiflotfy: look into #ubuntu-classroom
* mvo has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
RainCT
If we had huge number of blacklists. This can be possible since people don't
want fine grained privacy. We can set the default modes and give them option.
E.g. For chrome, we will log all the events in normal browsing and no logging
in incognito mode. Additionally people sometimes watch pr0n in
Meh, type in last comment
scrap This can be possible since people don't want fine grained privacy
I meant
This can be possible since many people do want fine grained privacy
--
Blacklist API sucks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
You received this bug notification because you are a
Go Manish! Go Manish! Its your birthday :P
(please ignore this comment)
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Assignee: Seif Lotfy (seif) = Manish Sinha (manishsinha)
--
Blacklist API sucks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
2010/9/10 Manish Sinha 612...@bugs.launchpad.net:
Will this clear all the blacklists? I just want to remove one specific
blacklist
Ask for the list of blacklisting rules, remove the one you don't want
from it, and set it again (with that rule removed).
--
Blacklist API sucks
@Manish: Right, that will clear all blacklists I am afraid. Which is
also partially why we have this bug open to come up with something which
is easier for apps to handle.
--
Blacklist API sucks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612344
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On 5 August 2010 23:04, Siegfried Gevatter rai...@ubuntu.com wrote:
2010/8/5 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com:
Apps would use their normal namespaced bus names to construct blacklist
names. Like 'org.gnome.Epiphany.PrivateBrowsing' for the blacklist
template epiphany install
So if we have 10 clients monitoring the blacklist the daemon it will
result in 10 GetTemplates() calls on the bus? ;-) How about putting the
new list of templates in the Changed() signal? That way there'll be no
extra noise on the buzz when the list changes.
Anyway, I am still not entirely
28 matches
Mail list logo
