I think it's mostly about what type of message we send people, and how
we're perceived. Now that we're also in KDE, and looking at other
platforms besides that as well, it looks strange for us to be in the
GNOME namespace.
On 26 November 2010 23:12, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
Morten we should not break our current clients to satisfy upcoming
clients...
I know it seems weird but I think they can live with it since it just a
freaking namespace. I could call it org.hunannyyumyum.Zeitgeist and it
should not matter :)
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Morten Mjelva
Dude, what the hell? You were the one who asked me to submit this
proposal. Make up your mind.
On 28 November 2010 16:24, Seif Lotfy 681...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Morten we should not break our current clients to satisfy upcoming
clients...
I know it seems weird but I think they can live
The submission is to have the whole team discuss. I dont take the
decision.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Morten Mjelva
681...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
Dude, what the hell? You were the one who asked me to submit this
proposal. Make up your mind.
On 28 November 2010 16:24, Seif Lotfy
I think mhr3's suggestion about using two namespaces for a while is a
good solution.
If we keep our existing gnome namespace, but deprecate it, and at the
same time move to freedesktop for 0.7, we could remove the gnome
namespace in some later release.
On 28 November 2010 17:17, Seif Lotfy
I agree with that approach
Maybe we can do that over the next 3 releases.
So for natty we will have 2 namespaces while for natty+1 we will have only
one
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Morten Mjelva
681...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
I think mhr3's suggestion about using two namespaces for a
I'm with Mikkel.
--
Moving Zeitgeist dbus Bus name from gnome to Freedesktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681887
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
Status in Zeitgeist Framework: New
Bug
I don't agree with changing the namepsace for dbus names.
There is simply no good reason why we should make this move. After all the
gnome part is just a random string. And noone on KDE, Windows or whatever
platform should have a problem using this string.
Changing the name, maybe by even using
Marking as wontfix since this seems to be the consensus of a majority of
the maintainers
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
Moving Zeitgeist dbus Bus name from gnome to Freedesktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681887
You received this bug notification because you are
I don't think it is any more possible (if yes, then very tough). It
might break nearly all the applications. Fixing them would be a huge
pain and someone needs to track all such instances.
--
Moving Zeitgeist dbus Bus name from gnome to Freedesktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681887
You
I don't have any problems with moving to freedesktop dbus name as long
as it does not break things. If it doesn't I don't have any objections
to anything.
--
Moving Zeitgeist dbus Bus name from gnome to Freedesktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681887
You received this bug notification because
There's no need to actually move our code and infrastructure to
freedesktop.org hosting in order to be an official freedesktop
project. We can certainly keep our code on Launchpad if we want to do
that.
Additionally, we're definitely in freedesktop.org's target audience,
so it shouldn't be
Honestly I don't see what good this bring us except breakage of existing
libs. We could own two names, but that just seems silly. Application
authors should never need to see these namespaces. And it's a
*namespace* nothing more. I'm quite sure distributors and ISVs can see
past this.
FWIW
13 matches
Mail list logo
