with 4+ kernel, which impacts OpenPGM so dramatically. I tried to google
but have not found yet.
Thanks in advance,
Alex Tsiberev,
P.S.E.
IPFRAN
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq
Yes, Bitcoin still uses ZMQ.
At least, Bitcoin-Core (most common implementation) is, but some other
implementations do not use it. I think it uses version 4.0.0 now.
When building from source it can be disabled.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 25, 2020 12:00 PM,
true, it's also
true that the EU plans to reimburse that EU-based company's losses so as
to nullify these sanctions.
In any case, ZeroMQ is not the only dev project having these problems.
Communication, concertation and solidarity is key here.
alex.
On 7/29/19 7:26 AM, Esa HekmatiZadeh wrote
Hi
Is there an existing ZeroMQ Java implementation that supports UDP multicast?
Best regards,
Alex
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
a separate connection to the
publisher.
The pub-sub-pattern is mostly only a viable option when the subscriber
is able to work even if it doesn't receive all messages. If your usecase
does not allow that you might be better of using another pattern, like
req-rep or broker.
Best,
alex.
On 04.01.2017 10
Indeed, talking to groups of servers + discovery would be the features
I'd want in an OpenSSH replacement.
For crypto, do go for the (native) CurveZMQ route, as in the end it
boils down to placing the public key of your machine on the servers. The
CurveZMQ (and the CurveCP project from which it
pting" the
message once with his private key, but in fact the message is encrypted
as many times as there are subscribers.
Cheers!
alex.
On 13.10.2016 08:59, LENFERINK Roy wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> Currently I’m investigating the possibilities of ZeroMQ.
>
>
>
would also recommend to you to not think about all the moving parts
in all their possible configurations (i.e. all the cars on the road),
but to really boil it down to: What data should be where? And how should
receivers of that data respond to it? That is, write a protocol.
Best,
not block.
However that's probably not what you want ;). Still wanted to share that
detail.
Best,
alex.
[1]: http://api.zeromq.org/2-1:zmq-send
[2]: http://api.zeromq.org/2-1:zmq-socket#toc6
On 03.08.2016 18:44, Tobias Elbert wrote:
> Actually I think I just answered my own quest
own bindings and release them
with a BSD licence - I'd do that whether I was writing something
open source or commercial. LGPL might fly if all you're worried
about is ensuring patches to the project get recycled.
Alex
>
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 at 16:28 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrot
://librelist.com/browser//flask/2015/7/14/switch-mailing-list-software-away-from-librelist/
[2]: https://lists.riseup.net/
Am 14.04.2016 um 11:54 schrieb alex.:
> Also a 'nay' on Google Groups from me.
>
> And I also concur with Lionel Orry: Librelist is just awesome.
> Personally I've had the
with
GSL, ready to be integrated into ZeroMQ with zproto, and checked for
validity and security by the TLA toolbox.
Well, we'll see.
Best,
alex.
On 14.04.2016 12:21, Bjorn Reese wrote:
> On 04/14/2016 11:30 AM, alex. wrote:
>
>> Anyway after doing a little more research some pape
criterion (satisfied by Google Groups and many others): spam
resistance.
Lists at sourceforge that I'm on have more spam than genuine messages.
So don't go there please.
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lis
SL to start off both the protocol and my codebase
using state machines (so big thanks for the links Pieter and Kevin!).
But if it'll be possible to generate a CSP style protocol using GSL from
my state machine, I'd be enormously happy.
Thus my questions: Did anyone ever try something like this r
and from their help page as a list owner you
seem to have good access to archive data, so porting them over is
probably easily doable. But you can simply send an E-Mail to
m...@librelist.com and ask, the guy running the show is really nice.
best,
alex.
On 14.04.2016 09:41, Pieter Hintjens wrote
oogle Groups interface, a lot
of them seem to reply trimming all context, which makes following conversations
hard.
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
to translate FSMs into CSPs? Or am I
just too uninformed to know that something like this is simply absurd?
All the best,
alex.
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Any ideas on this one?
Alex
On 14 Mar 2016, at 16:58, Alex Bligh <a...@alex.org.uk> wrote:
> If messages are transmitted through chains of RTR->DLR from A to Z, and it is
> guaranteed the intervening application code does not reorder the packets, is
> it guaranteed tha
een A and Z will continue to
be ordered? Obviously this is the case for REQ->...->REP chains, but what about
RTR->DLR->RTR->DLR (for example) chains where there may be more than one
message in flight at once?
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-dev m
• Group (Radio/Dish topic) is string and currently limited to 15 chars
> (might be increased in the future)
Can I put in a bid for at least 16? 16 is the minimum required for the binary
encoding of a UUID (128 bits).
What's the reason for a compile time l
://github.com/pebbe/zmq4/pull/81
but the current view of the maintainer is that this is not desirable,
(as per that pull request) therefore I am providing it as a separate library.
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http
On 24 Feb 2016, at 10:35, Pieter Hintjens <piet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, fixed now.
Thanks!
Alex
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Pieter Hintjens <piet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Something went wrong, thanks for reporting this. I'll fix it later today.
>>
api.zeromq.org appears to have been invaded by "LOAD TAG: entry"
and "LOAD TAG: simpara".
See e.g.:
http://api.zeromq.org/4-0:zmq-socket
It would be more readable without these.
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-dev mai
atic in go as the same goroutine can be scheduled
between different OS threads) I can't immediately see why the above would not
work.
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
service ID should probably be the innermost frame (possibly after the empty
frame delimiter and with it's own zero frame delimiter) so the transport over
TCP could (if necessary) be routed transparently through RTR sockets.
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-d
it would seem to be easier to
modify the endpoint protocol.
Am I missing something? Am I approaching this the right way?
--
Alex Bligh
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
as well be true?
So is it advisable to just shove the fd of inotify into zmq's polling
function?
Thanks!
alex.
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
, or does this seem
like a very uncommon use of containers in the czmq world?
Alex
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
of it, a client can issue a
connect and, if the server has not issued a bind yet, it adds itself
to a pending_connections structure which will be read once the server
binds the socket.
So, my question is, is the above statement outdated, or am I reading the
code incorrectly?
Thanks,
--
Alex | apyr
03.01.2014 14:45, Bjorn Reese kirjoitti:
On 01/03/2014 02:03 AM, Alex Grönholm wrote:
As it stands, the TCP keepalive intervals are given in seconds on the
vast majority of operating systems.
Furthermore, if the peer is unresponsive then additional probes will be
sent at regular intervals
your argumentation,
and sometimes you think: why on the heal have they limited this?.
But there is always a middle path: it would be not costly to have an
API with seconds and one with milliseconds for that case, in order to
not break standard usage claimed by Alex.
Le 03/01/2014 02:03, Alex
at 11:29 PM, Alex Grönholm
alex.gronh...@nextday.fi wrote:
This isn't directly related to ZeroMQ, but it is somewhat relevant now given
A) the addition of the (yet unimplemented) heartbeating feature in ZMTP/3.0
and B) the Windows TCP keepalive parameters fix I committed recently.
The question
of operating systems.
If we change it so the values are given in milliseconds instead (meaning
that we divide the given value by 1000 before calling setsockopt()),
this will break existing apps that set the keepalive intervals as seconds.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Alex Grönholm alex.gronh
This isn't directly related to ZeroMQ, but it is somewhat relevant now
given A) the addition of the (yet unimplemented) heartbeating feature in
ZMTP/3.0 and B) the Windows TCP keepalive parameters fix I committed
recently.
The question is: has someone here used TCP keepalives as a substitute
have exception on exit but
still cannot receive anything.
Please kindly assist me. Lots of thanks.
Alex
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import org.junit.Before;
import
other than the built in load balanced
functionality in PUSH and DEALER. In your server, you would maintain
a mapping of session ids to worker ids. The LRU pattern in the guide
defines a nice example for this kind of setup.
-Michel
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Alex Massover
Alex Keahan akeahan at gbtradingllc.com writes:
$ ./syncpub
[1] 6611
$ Waiting for subscribers
$ ./syncsub A
[2] 6612
$ ./syncsub B
[3] 6613
$ Broadcasting messages
Message mismatch: received 'Msg #1266' expected 'Msg #1001'
A: received 1000 updates
Message mismatch: received 'Msg
?
Alex Keahan
Run as follows:
$ ./syncpub
$ ./syncsub A
$ ./syncsub B
You should see something similar to this:
$ ./syncpub
[1] 6611
$ Waiting for subscribers
$ ./syncsub A
[2] 6612
$ ./syncsub B
[3] 6613
$ Broadcasting messages
Message mismatch: received 'Msg #1266' expected 'Msg #1001
This would be appropriate to commit:
--- a/examples/Perl/rrserver.pl
+++ b/examples/Perl/rrserver.pl
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ my $context = ZeroMQ::Context-new();
# Socket to talk to clients
my $responder = $context-socket(ZMQ_REP);
is not there... Do you know what is the scenario of events
for such situation? How long would've that continued until anything
(OS or ZMQ) would've closed that socket?
Should I have application - level fix for such situation or there is
some ZMQ socket option that I could've used?
--
Alex
be helpful to deal with
situation like this in future.
Thanks!
Alex.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alex Sergeyev a...@alexsergeyev.com wrote:
One router core-dumped today. Subscriber behind it never realized that
it's
Thanks for the info.
-- Alex
On 26 March 2012 20:11, Lourens Naudé lour...@methodmissing.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
That'll be fine - the fd events are edge-triggered and would work with any
reactor implementation. Just remember to read until completion as the
notification can be for more than one
returned by
zsockopt_fd() in this way, or would this break things when I issue
zframe_recv_nowait()?
Thanks in advance,
Alex
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
?
Any support is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Alex
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
to `epoll_ctl'
undefined reference to `epoll_wait'
All these calls appear to link to libstdc++.so.6, and gcc-3.3.1 is only
compatible with libstdc++.so.5.
Any support is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Mikko Koppanen mikko.koppa...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 29
Hi Mikko,
Your suggestions worked perfectly! Can't thank you enough :)
All the best,
Alex
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Mikko Koppanen mikko.koppa...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Alex Ramirez alex.r.rami...@gmail.com
wrote:
The link errors of interest I'm seeing
Hello list,
I'm a complete newbie in the use and application of Zeromq so I am sure
my questions will sound quite inane and downright stupid. I apologise
in advance. I stumbled on ZeroMQ early this week while googling for a
decent message system that is'nt implemented in Java. I use
Ah, is that the trunk version you were saying you got to build successfully on
x64?
On Mar 6, 2011, at 11:08 PM, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote:
On 7 March 2011 01:31, Alex Forster a...@alexforster.com wrote:
Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk writes:
Clean builds under Win64
The trunk builds but skips the asm because CMake 2.8.3 is broken, I've
updated to 2.8.4 and CMake is too stupid to find MSVC 2010 Professional and
asks me to install the 7.1 SDK so I end up with I guess six compilers now.
Aha.
The 8-bit and 16-bit atomics are a part of how ticket locks
Just minor tweaks, already noted on stackoverflow that ML64 does not have the
same features as ML, the examples in the SDK have an invalid syntax when
ported to x64.
Also, CMake doesn't generate the MSVC project files including the asm,
probably at a later date as it is plastered with
Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk writes:
Clean builds under Win64.
...
Improve spinlock performance with inline ticket based spinlock implementation.
http://www.google.com/search?q=__asm+keyword+not+supported+on+this+architecture
ticket.h is coughing up because Visual C++ doesn't support
This is /fantastic/
Some time in January, the project made a very strong push at improving the
build environment in Windows. They introduced support for CMake, which as a
developer I dislike, but as a user I very very much like. CMake makes it
incredibly easy to target Visual Studio by actually
I'm having a hell of a time compiling ZeroMQ 2.0.10 with support for OpenPGM
2.1.27-pre2. I got it down to 18 linker errors, and then I hit a wall because
those errors are all related to missing MinGW libraries, and I'm using Visual
Studio. My options now are: (1) dump Visual Studio, install
On Feb 19, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Steven McCoy wrote:
You can add the MinGW compiler dependencies into MSVC, they're listed here as
libgcc.a libmingwex.a
http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/wiki/OpenPgmCReferenceLinkTheseLibraryFiles
That's a very helpful page. If I can get my hands on those two
Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Close enough to official for me.
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Great! I would suggest adding a link to your project to www.zeromq.org. It's
wiki, so you can do so yourself.
Gladly, done.
I am not familiar with CLR. Doesn't the problem the context is solving (i.e.
zeromq being used from two libraries that are later on linked into a single
application
For example, the names of inproc endpoints are stored in the context. If
library A uses inproc endpoint named X and library B accidentally uses
endpoint X as well, they start messining with each other.
That's a very good point, I'll definitely have to address that. I'm willing to
jump
You do know that clrzmq2 supported all of what you mentioned besides the
reference counting.
If you had of submitted a patch for clrzmq2 it would have been very
welcome.
I certainly didn't mean to offend. I'll admit that, while I did have some
different ideas as to what a C#-ified ZeroMQ
I notice NUZQ seems to use lambdas, these were introduced in .NET 3.0, I
purposely kept clrzmq2 targeting .net 2.0.
The fact is a 2.0 is the prevalent .NET framework, many large
organization will actually only be using that.
The application I maintain as a day job is targeted at 2.0 and
it in a project I'm working
on, and so far it all seems to be working smoothly and at high throughput, but
I'm releasing it as beta because I don't feel that it has enough real-world
experience yet.
Alex Forster___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev
and connected?
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sustrik [mailto:sust...@250bpm.com]
Sent: 21 March 2010 04:34
To: Alex Yu
Cc: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] failed to filter topic in pub/sub
Alex,
I tried Jeff version and your version and can't get them
Hi Martin,
Problem solved..
I can add new subscribe and remove old subscribe in the runtime.
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alex Yu [mailto:alexc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 April 2010 02:27
To: 'Martin Sustrik'
Cc: 'zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org'
Subject: RE: [zeromq-dev] failed
);
Alex
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Martin,
Attached is the code.
I tried Jeff version and your version and can't get them work.
Please see what's the problem.
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sustrik [mailto:sust...@250bpm.com]
Sent: 21 March 2010 03:56
To: Alex Yu
Cc: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Subject
Hi Zmq dev,
I am a new user for zmq and want to make use of the zmq 2.X in my C#
project.
I found that there is not c# wrapping for zmq 2.x. Is there any C#
wrapping for 2.x just like that in 1.x?
Please let me know! Thanks!
Regards,
Alex
Thanks Martin,
Of coz I would like to tried it.
But I know nth about c++ so tried to use SWIG to generate the C#
interface last night and failed last night.
Could you send me the binding for 1.0 so that I can port it to 2.0?
Kindly Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sustrik
66 matches
Mail list logo
