On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
I know there was (is ?) a bug where a zfs destroy of a large
snapshot would run a system out of kernel memory, but searching the
Symptoms are like what you've described, including the huge scanrate
just before the system
2011-10-31 16:28, Paul Kraus wrote:
How big is / was the snapshot and dataset ? I am dealing with a 7
TB dataset and a 2.5 TB snapshot on a system with 32 GB RAM.
I had a smaller-scale problem, with datasets and snapshots sized
several hundred GB, but on an 8Gb RAM system. So
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
2011-10-31 16:28, Paul Kraus wrote:
Oracle has provided a loaner system with 128 GB RAM and it took 75 GB of
RAM
to destroy the problem snapshot). I had not yet posted a summary as we
are still working through the overall
A couple points in line below ...
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:56 PM, weiliam.hong weiliam.h...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a fresh installation of OI151a:
- SM X8DTH, 12GB RAM, LSI 9211-8i (latest IT-mode firmware)
- pool_A : SG ES.2 Constellation (SAS)
- pool_B : WD RE4 (SATA)
- no settings in
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
I am catching up with some 500 posts that I skipped this
summer, and came up with a new question. In short, is it
possible to add restartability to ZFS SEND, for example
by adding artificial snapshots (of configurable
Thanks for the reply.
Some background.. The server is fresh installed. Right before running
the tests, the pools are newly created.
Some comments below
On 10/31/2011 10:33 PM, Paul Kraus wrote:
A couple points in line below ...
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:56 PM,
On 10/28/2011 01:04 AM, Mark Wolek wrote:
before the forum closed.
Did I miss something?
Karl
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication (including all attachments) is
confidential and is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) only and
may contain information that is private,
Hi Folks,
I have been having issues with Solaris kernel based systems locking up
and am wondering if anyone else has observed a similar symptom before.
Some information/background...
Systems the symptom has presented on: NFS server (Nexenta Core 3.01) and a
MySQL Server (Sol 11 Express).
The
lmulc...@marinsoftware.com said:
. . .
The MySQL server is:
Dell R710 / 80G Memory with two daisy chained MD1220 disk arrays - 22 Disks
each - 600GB 10k RPM SAS Drives Storage Controller: LSI, Inc. 1068E (JBOD)
I have also seen similar symptoms on systems with MD1000 disk arrays
containing
Hi Marion,
Thanks for your swifty reply!
Have you got the latest firmware on your LSI 1068E HBA's? These have been
known to have lockups/timeouts when used with SAS expanders (disk
enclosures)
with incompatible firmware revisions, and/or with older mpt drivers.
I'll need to check that out
Hi All/Marion,
A small update...
known to have lockups/timeouts when used with SAS expanders (disk
enclosures)
with incompatible firmware revisions, and/or with older mpt drivers.
I'll need to check that out -- I'm 90% sure that these are fresh out of
box HBAs.
Will try an upgrade there
On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:56 PM, weiliam.hong wrote:
Questions:
1. Why does SG SAS drives degrade to 10 MB/s while WD RE4 remain consistent
at 100MB/s after 10-15 min?
2. Why does SG SAS drive show only 70+ MB/s where is the published figures
are 100MB/s refer here?
Are the SAS drives
Thanks for the reply.
On 11/1/2011 11:03 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:56 PM, weiliam.hong wrote:
Questions:
1. Why does SG SAS drives degrade to10 MB/s while WD RE4 remain consistent
at100MB/s after 10-15 min?
2. Why does SG SAS drive show only 70+ MB/s where is the
Hi All,
We did not have the latest firmware on the HBA - through a lot of pain I
managed to boot into an MS-DOS disk and run the firmware update. We're now
running the latest on this card from the LSI.com website. (both HBA BIOS
and Firmware)
No joy.. the system seized up again within a few
FWIW, we recommend disabling C-states in the BIOS for NexentaStor systems.
C-states are evil.
-- richard
On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:46 PM, Lachlan Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
We did not have the latest firmware on the HBA - through a lot of pain I
managed to boot into an MS-DOS disk and run the
15 matches
Mail list logo
