-discuss] online increase of zfs after LUN increase ?
imho, the 147440-21 does not list the bugs that solved by 148098- even through
it obsoletes the 148098
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
partitions manually.
Zsolt
From: Cindy Swearingen [cindy.swearin...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:00 PM
To: Habony, Zsolt
Cc: Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) Ph.D; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] online increase of zfs after LUN
imho, the 147440-21 does not list the bugs that solved by 148098-
even through it obsoletes the 148098
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2012, at 18:14, Habony, Zsolt zsolt.hab...@hp.com wrote:
Thank you for your replies.
First, sorry for misleading info. Patch 148098-03 indeed not included
-
From: Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) Ph.D [mailto:laot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2012. július 26. 14:49
To: Habony, Zsolt
Cc: Cindy Swearingen; Sašo Kiselkov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] online increase of zfs after LUN increase ?
imho, the 147440-21 does not list the bugs
Hello,
There is a feature of zfs (autoexpand, or zpool online -e ) that it can
consume the increased LUN immediately and increase the zpool size.
That would be a very useful ( vital ) feature in enterprise environment.
Though when I tried to use it, it did not work. LUN expanded and
On 07/25/2012 05:49 PM, Habony, Zsolt wrote:
Hello,
There is a feature of zfs (autoexpand, or zpool online -e ) that it can
consume the increased LUN immediately and increase the zpool size.
That would be a very useful ( vital ) feature in enterprise environment.
Though when I tried
Hi--
Patches are available to fix this so I would suggest that you
request them from MOS support.
This fix fell through the cracks and we tried really hard to
get it in the current Solaris 10 release but sometimes things
don't work in your favor. The patches are available though.
Relabeling
Thank you for your replies.
First, sorry for misleading info. Patch 148098-03 indeed not included in
recommended set, but trying to download it shows that 147440-15 obsoletes it
and 147440-19 is included in latest recommended patch set.
Thus time solves the problem elsewhere.
Just for fun, my
Hi--
I guess I can't begin to understand patching.
Yes, you provided a whole disk to zpool create but it actually
creates a part(ition) 0 as you can see in the output below.
Part TagFlag First SectorSizeLast Sector
0 usrwm 256 19.99GB
