yeah i really wish the HCL was easier to work with, and allowed comments.
for instance that HCL entry was updated in 2007 sometime. since then
like you've said it could have been better or dropped altogether. some
sort of more community oriented aspect might help beef it up some.
also making the
I start the cp, and then, with prstat -a, watch the cpu load for the
cp process climb to 25% on a 4-core machine.
Load, measured for example with 'uptime', climbs steadily until the reboot.
Note that the machine does not dump properly, panic or hang - rather,
it reboots.
I attached a screenshot
definitely time to bust out some mdb -k and see what it's moaning about.
I did not see the screenshot earlier... sorry about that.
Nathan.
Blake wrote:
I start the cp, and then, with prstat -a, watch the cpu load for the
cp process climb to 25% on a 4-core machine.
Load, measured for example
definitely time to bust out some mdb -K or boot -k and see what it's
moaning about.
I did not see the screenshot earlier... sorry about that.
Nathan.
Blake wrote:
I start the cp, and then, with prstat -a, watch the cpu load for the
cp process climb to 25% on a 4-core machine.
Load, measured
So, if I boot with the -k boot flags (to load the kernel debugger?)
what do I need to look for? I'm no expert at kernel debugging.
I think this is a pci error judging by the console output, or at least
is i/o related...
thanks for your feedback,
Blake
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Nathan
Hello everyone,
My understanding is that the ZFS crypto framework will not release until
2010. In light of that, I'm wondering if the following approach to
encryption could make sense for some subset of users:
The idea is to use the compression framework to do both compression and
Monish Shah wrote:
Hello everyone,
My understanding is that the ZFS crypto framework will not release until
2010.
That is incorrect information, where did you get that from ?
In light of that, I'm wondering if the following approach to
encryption could make sense for some subset of
Monish Shah wrote:
Hello Darren,
Monish Shah wrote:
Hello everyone,
My understanding is that the ZFS crypto framework will not release
until 2010.
That is incorrect information, where did you get that from ?
It was in Mike Shapiro's presentation at the Open Solaris Storage Summit
that
Hello Darren,
Monish Shah wrote:
Hello everyone,
My understanding is that the ZFS crypto framework will not release until
2010.
That is incorrect information, where did you get that from ?
It was in Mike Shapiro's presentation at the Open Solaris Storage Summit
that took place a couple
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Darren J Moffat
darr...@opensolaris.org wrote:
That is all that has to be done on the OpenSolaris side to make a 10g lun
available over iSCSI. The rest of it is all how Linux sets up its iSCSI
client side which I don't know but I know on Solaris it is
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
snip/
On the SAN, create (2) LUNs - one for your primary data, and one for
your snapshots/backups.
On hostA, create a zpool on the primary data LUN (call it zpool A), and
another zpool on the backup LUN (zpool B).
Hi,
I have a X4150 with a J4200 connected populated with 12 x 1 TB Disks (SATA)
I run backup_pc as my software for backing up.
Is there anything I can do to make the command line more responsive during
backup windows? At the moment it grinds to a complete standstill.
Thanks
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
User-land will then have a daemon, whether or not it is one daemon per
file-system or really just one daemon does not matter. This process will open
'/dev/quota' and empty the transaction log entries constantly. Take the
uid,gid entries and update
Hi Erik,
A couple of questions about what you said in your email. In synopsis 2, if
hostA has gone belly up and is no longer accessible, then a step that is
implied (or maybe I'm just inferring it) is to go to the SAN and reassign the
LUN from hostA to hostB. Correct?
- Original
Note that:
6501037 want user/group quotas on ZFS
Is already committed to be fixed in build 113 (i.e. in the next month).
- Eric
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:04:04PM +0900, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
In the style of a discussion over a beverage, and talking about
user-quotas on ZFS, I recently
howard chen wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Darren J Moffat
darr...@opensolaris.org wrote:
That is all that has to be done on the OpenSolaris side to make a 10g lun
available over iSCSI. The rest of it is all how Linux sets up its iSCSI
client side which I don't know but I know
That is pretty freaking cool.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Eric Schrock eric.schr...@sun.com wrote:
Note that:
6501037 want user/group quotas on ZFS
Is already committed to be fixed in build 113 (i.e. in the next month).
- Eric
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:04:04PM +0900, Jorgen
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
In the style of a discussion over a beverage, and talking about
user-quotas on ZFS, I recently pondered a design for implementing user
quotas on ZFS after having far too little sleep.
It is probably nothing new, but I would be curious what you experts
think of the
On 12 March, 2009 - Matthew Ahrens sent me these 5,0K bytes:
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
In the style of a discussion over a beverage, and talking about
user-quotas on ZFS, I recently pondered a design for implementing user
quotas on ZFS after having far too little sleep.
It is probably
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
User-land will then have a daemon, whether or not it is one daemon per
file-system or really just one daemon does not matter. This process
will open '/dev/quota' and empty the transaction log entries
constantly. Take the
maj == Maidak Alexander J maidakalexand...@johndeere.com writes:
maj If you're having issues with a disk contoller or disk IO
maj driver its highly likely that a savecore to disk after the
maj panic will fail. I'm not sure how to work around this
not in Solaris, but as a concept for
Gavin Maltby wrote:
Hi,
The manpage says
Specifically, used = usedbychildren + usedbydataset +
usedbyrefreservation +, usedbysnapshots. These proper-
ties are only available for datasets created on zpool
version 13 pools.
.. and I now realize that
Grant,
Yes this is correct. If host A goes belly up, you can deassign the LUN
from host A and assign to
host B. Being that host A has not gracefully exported it's zpool you
will need to 'zpool import -f poolname'
to force the pool to be imported because it hasn't been exported prior
to import
I've managed to get the data transfer to work by rearranging my disks
so that all of them sit on the integrated SATA controller.
So, I feel pretty certain that this is either an issue with the
Supermicro aoc-sat2-mv8 card, or with PCI-X on the motherboard (though
I would think that the integrated
Maybe you're also seeing this one?
6586537 async zio taskqs can block out userland commands
-Jeff
Blake wrote:
I think we need some data to look at to find out what's being slow.
Try some commands like this to get data:
prstat -a
iostat -x 5
zpool iostat 5 (if you are using ZFS)
and then
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:
I've managed to get the data transfer to work by rearranging my disks
so that all of them sit on the integrated SATA controller.
So, I feel pretty certain that this is either an issue with the
Supermicro aoc-sat2-mv8 card,
Tim wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com
mailto:blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:
I've managed to get the data transfer to work by rearranging my disks
so that all of them sit on the integrated SATA controller.
So, I feel pretty certain that this is
b == Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com writes:
b http://www.provantage.com/lsi-logic-lsi00117~7LSIG03X.htm
I'm having trouble matching up chips, cards, drivers, platforms, and
modes with the LSI stuff. The more I look at it the mroe confused I
get.
Platforms:
x86
SPARC
Drivers:
mpt
For what it's worth, I have been running Nevada (so, same kernel as
opensolaris) for ages (at least 18 months) on a Gigabyte board with the
MCP55 chipset and it's been flawless.
I liked it so much, I bought it's newer brother, based on the nvidia
750SLI chipset... M750SLI-DS4
Cheers!
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 18:30, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
I love the way they use the numbers 3800 and 3080, so you are
constantly transposing them thus leaving google littered with all
this confusingly wrong information.
Think of the middle two digits as (number of external ports,
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
In order for this to work, ZFS data blocks need to somehow be associated
with a POSIX user ID. To start with, the ZFS POSIX layer is implemented
on top of a non-POSIX Layer which does not need to know about POSIX user
IDs. ZFS also supports snapshots and clones.
Eric Schrock wrote:
Note that:
6501037 want user/group quotas on ZFS
Is already committed to be fixed in build 113 (i.e. in the next month).
- Eric
Wow, that would be fantastic. We have the Sun vendors camped out at the
data center trying to apply fresh patches. I believe 6798540 fixed
As it turns out, I'm working on zfs user quotas presently, and expect to
integrate in about a month. My implementation is in-kernel, integrated
with the rest of ZFS, and does not have the drawbacks you mention below.
I merely suggested my design as it may have been something I _could_
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
Great! Will there be any particular limits on how many uids, or size of
uids in your implementation? UFS generally does not, but I did note that
if uid go over 1000 it flips out and changes the quotas file to
128GB in size.
All UIDs, as well as SIDs (from the SMB
wm == Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com writes:
* SR = Software RAID IT = Integrate. Target mode. IR mode
is not supported.
wm Integrated target mode lets you export some storage attached
wm to the host system (through another adapter, presumably) as a
wm storage
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:24:12 -0400
Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
wm == Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com writes:
* SR = Software RAID IT = Integrate. Target mode. IR mode
is not supported.
wm Integrated target mode lets you export some storage attached
wm to
36 matches
Mail list logo
