Even though it's not directly ZFS related, I've seen some similar discussion
on this list and maybe someone has "the final" answer to this problem, as most
tips and "these things could help" I have found so far have not fully solved
the problem.
We are struggling with the behaviour of the combin
hi
I donot have answer but just want to mention
ZFS appliance move away from SATA to SAS with expander for a reason
IIRC ZFS appliance based on SATA has one biggest problem, one SATA HDD
will cause the whole array down
regards
On 4/5/2012 4:48 AM, Weber, Markus wrote:
Even though it's not di
2012-04-04 23:27, Jan-Aage Frydenbø-Bruvoll wrote:
Which OS and release?
This is OpenIndiana oi_148, ZFS pool version 28.
There was a bug in some releases circa 2010 that you might be hitting. It is
harmless, but annoying.
Ok - what bug is this, how do I verify whether I am facing it here a
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Weber, Markus wrote:
> Even though it's not directly ZFS related, I've seen some similar discussion
> on this list and maybe someone has "the final" answer to this problem, as most
> tips and "these things could help" I have found so far have not fully solved
> the
2012-04-05 16:04, Jim Klimov написал:
2012-04-04 23:27, Jan-Aage Frydenbø-Bruvoll wrote:
Which OS and release?
This is OpenIndiana oi_148, ZFS pool version 28.
There was a bug in some releases circa 2010 that you might be
hitting. It is
harmless, but annoying.
Ok - what bug is this, how do
Paul wrote:
>I have not seen any odd issues with the five J4400 configuration
> since we went production.
I'm not familiar with the J4400 at all, but isn't Sun/Oracle using -like NetAPP-
Interposer cards and thus handling the SATA drives more or less like SAS ones?
Markus
--
KPN Internati
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Weber, Markus
wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>> I have not seen any odd issues with the five J4400 configuration
>> since we went production.
>
> I'm not familiar with the J4400 at all, but isn't Sun/Oracle using -like
> NetAPP-
> Interposer cards and thus handling the
On 4/5/2012 10:22 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Weber, Markus
wrote:
Paul wrote:
I have not seen any odd issues with the five J4400 configuration
since we went production.
I'm not familiar with the J4400 at all, but isn't Sun/Oracle using -like NetAPP-
Interpos
J4400 is using LSI/SiliconStor SS1320 Interposer cards to handle SATA HD
With past experience, we have better luck with Hitachi SATA then WD SATA HD.
Sun was using Hitachi HD, too.
If you have me to choose, 7200 RPM SAS HD is still the best choice. Most of
our customers use pure SAS HD on our JB
On 04/ 5/12 07:08 AM, Jan-Aage Frydenbø-Bruvoll wrote:
Dear List,
I am struggling with a storage pool on a server, where I would like to offline
a device for replacement. The pool consists of two-disk stripes set up in
mirrors (yep, stupid, but we were running out of VDs on the controller at t
Hello list,
What's the current production-readiness of OI 151a? I'm evaluating Solaris 11
at the moment on HP server hardware + SAS JBODs. Also considering picking up a
Thumper/Thor on the used market. For a ZFS storage server, is it a better idea
to just stick w/ Oracle Solaris, or is OI also
Anh,
We have customers using both Solaris 11 and OI 151a. Most of customers are
using Solaris 11 for production and OI for tier 2 or backup so far
Solaris 11 Zpool version is at 33 while OI at 28 + some bug fix
Detail can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS
$ uname -a
SunOS solaris11
12 matches
Mail list logo
