Thank you.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi Darren,
> On 08/30/12 11:07, Anonymous wrote:
> > Hi. I have a spare off the shelf consumer PC and was thinking about loading
> > Solaris on it for a development box since I use Studio @work and like it
> > better than gcc. I was thinking maybe it isn't so smart to use ZFS since it
> > has onl
> It depends on the model. Consumer models are less likely to
> immediately flush. My understanding that this is done in part to do
> some write coalescing and reduce the number of P/E cycles. Enterprise
> models should either flush, or contain a super capacitor that provides
> enough power for th
You wrote:
> 2012-07-23 18:37, Anonymous wrote:
> > Really, it would be so helpful to know which drives we can buy with
> > confidence and which should be avoided...is there any way to know from the
> > manufacturers web sites or do you have to actually buy one and see what it
> > does? Thanks to
I've been watching the heat control issue carefully since I had to take a
job offshore (cough reverse H1B cough) in a place without adequate AC and I
was able to get them to ship my servers and some other gear. Then I read
Intel is guaranteeing their servers will work up to 100 degrees F ambient
t
Richard Elling said
> If the errors bubble up to ZFS, then they will be shown in the output of
> "zpool status"
On the console I was seeing retryable read errors that eventually
failed. The block number and drive path were included but not any info I
could relate to the actual disk.
zpool statu
Hello all,
Trying to reply to everyone so far in one post.
casper@oracle.com said
> Did you try:
>
> iostat -En
I issued that command and I see (soft) errors from all 4 drives. There is a
serial no. field in the message headers but it is has no contents.
>
> messages in /var/adm/mes
I have a desktop system with 2 ZFS mirrors. One drive in one mirror is
starting to produce read errors and slowing things down dramatically. I
detached it and the system is running fine. I can't tell which drive it is
though! The error message and format command let me know which pair the bad
driv
Thank you all for your answers and links :-)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Solaris 10 If I install using ZFS root on only one drive is there a way
to add another drive as a mirror later? Sorry if this was discussed
already. I searched the archives and couldn't find the answer. Thank you.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-disc
You wrote:
> >
> > Hi Roy, things got alot worse since my first email. I don't know what
> > happened but I can't import the old pool at all. It shows no errors but when
> > I import it I get a kernel panic from assertion failed: zvol_get_stats(os,
> > nv) which looks like is fixed by patch 68019
Hi Roy, things got alot worse since my first email. I don't know what
happened but I can't import the old pool at all. It shows no errors but when
I import it I get a kernel panic from assertion failed: zvol_get_stats(os,
nv) which looks like is fixed by patch 6801926 which is applied in Solaris
1
I am having a problem after a new install of Solaris 10. The installed rpool
works fine when I have only those disks connected. When I connect disks from
an rpool I created during a previous installation, my newly installed rpool
is ignored even though the BIOS (x86) is set to boot only from the n
> Hi Dave,
Hi Cindy.
> Consider the easiest configuration first and it will probably save
> you time and money in the long run, like this:
>
> 73g x 73g mirror (one large s0 on each disk) - rpool
> 73g x 73g mirror (use whole disks) - data pool
>
> Then, get yourself two replacement disks, a g
> Right, put some small (30GB or something trivial) disks in for root and
> then make a nice fast multi-spindle pool for your data. If your 320s
> are around the same performance as your 500s, you could stripe and
> mirror them all into a big pool. ZFS will waste the extra 180 on the
> bigge
> If you plan to generate a lot of data, why use the root pool? You can put
> the /home and /proj filesystems (/export/...) on a separate pool, thus
> off-loading the root pool.
I don't, it's a development box with not alot happening.
>
> My two cents,
thanks
__
16 matches
Mail list logo
