@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
the archives :-)
regards
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
to shrink the NTFS partition
2) create a new partition without FS in the space now freed from NTFS
3) boot OpenSolaris, add the partition from 2) as vdev to your zpool.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss
a single user), it will
be consistent from the POV of the FS, but may not be from the POV of the
application.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
or technical wisdom to offer, I'd appreciate it as this
has been frustrating.
look in /var/adm/messages (.*) to see whether there's anything
interesting around the time you saw the loss of connectivity, and also
since, then take it from there.
HTH
Michael
--
regards/mit freundlichen Grüssen
Michael
of
these plans, much less do I have now.
--
regards/mit freundlichen Grüssen
Michael Schuster
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
freundlichen Grüssen
Michael Schuster
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 30.09.10 15:42, Mark J Musante wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Linder, Doug wrote:
Is there any technical difference between using zfs unmount to unmount
a ZFS filesystem versus the standard unix umount command? I always use
zfs unmount but some of my colleagues still just use umount. Is there
On 17.08.10 04:17, Will Murnane wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 21:58, Kishore Kumar Pusukuri
kish...@cs.ucr.edu wrote:
Hi,
I am surprised with the performances of some 64-bit multi-threaded
applications on my AMD Opteron machine. For most of the applications, the
performance of 32-bit version
On 08/12/10 04:16, Steve Gonczi wrote:
Greetings,
I am seeing some unexplained performance drop using the above cpus,
using a fairly up-to-date build ( late 145).
Basically, the system seems to be 98% idle, spending most if its time in this
stack:
unix`i86_mwait+0xd
On 27.07.10 14:21, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of devsk
I have many core files stuck in snapshots eating up gigs of my disk
space. Most of these are BE's which I don't really want to delete right
now.
On 19.05.10 17:53, John Andrunas wrote:
Not to my knowledge, how would I go about getting one? (CC'ing discuss)
man savecore and dumpadm.
Michael
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Mark J Musantemark.musa...@oracle.com wrote:
Do you have a coredump? Or a stack trace of the panic?
On
On 10.05.10 08:57, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi all
It seems that if using zfs, the usual tools like vmstat, sar, top etc are quite
worthless, since zfs i/o load is not reported as iowait etc. Are there any
plans to rewrite the old performance monitoring tools or the zfs parts to allow
for
On 28.04.10 14:06, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
Look up the inode number of README. (for example, ls -i README)
(suppose it’s inode 12345)
find
On 20.04.10 07:52, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 12:27 +0700, C. Bergström wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Greetings All:
Granted there has been much fear, uncertainty, and doubt following
Oracle's take over of Sun, but I ran across this on a FreeBSD mailing
list post dated
/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael SchusterOracle
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
support Java and OpenSolaris User Groups, as Sun has?
...
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
most of Solaris unsupported.
what is that supposed to mean?
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
' was supposed to avoid, I'd guess.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
to the data (the inode, in ufs-speak), and if one directory
entry of several is deleted, only the reference count changes.
It's probably a little more complicated with dedup, but I think the
parallel is valid.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n
. It
is the equivalent of uncompress-c. Input files are not
affected.
:-)
cheers
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
' ;-) and that even works on ufs.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
was thinking of creating a hard link (without the -s option),
but your point is valid for hard and soft links.
cheers
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
; the
traditional concat operation will cause all the data to be read and written
back, at which point dedup will kick in, and so most of the processing has
already been spent. (Per, please correct/comment)
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see
used rpool/export/home cp /testfile
/export/home/d${i}; done
as far as I understood it, the dedup works during writing, and won't
deduplicate already written data (this is planned for a later release).
isn't he doing just that (writing, that is)?
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp
to Team ZFS.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
). How's
that possible ?
just a few thoughts:
- how do you measure how much space your data consumes?
- how do you copy?
- is the other FS also ZFS?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs
Stathis Kamperis wrote:
2009/10/23 michael schuster michael.schus...@sun.com:
Stathis Kamperis wrote:
Salute.
I have a filesystem where I store various source repositories (cvs +
git). I have compression enabled on and zfs get compressratio reports
1.46x. When I copy all the stuff to another
to find out what's in a directory, but you'll
miss .files, and the shell you're using may have an influence ..
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
step for you.
HTH
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 01.10.09 08:25, camps support wrote:
I did zpool import -R /tmp/z rootpool
It only mounted /export and /rootpool only had /boot and /platform.
I need to be able to get /etc and /var?
zfs set mountpoint ...
zfs mount
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n
?
not anymore - I realised I had no relevant data on the box, so I
re-installed to get going again.
thx
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
.
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
michael schuster wrote:
All,
this morning, I did pkg image-update from 118 to 123 (internal repo),
and upon reboot all I got was the grub prompt - no menu, nothing.
I found a 2009.06 CD, and when I boot that and run zpool import, I
get told
localtank UNAVAIL insufficient replicas
-119 opensolaris-123 # this failed, because it's
active
6) pkg activate opensolaris-118 # so I can rename the new one
7) pkg rename ...
8) pkg activate opensolaris-123
9) reboot
thx
Michael
Cindy
On 09/18/09 11:05, michael schuster wrote:
michael schuster wrote:
All,
this morning, I did pkg
the indiana-discuss
archive for tips on
resolving the pkg-image-update no grub menu problem.
if I don't see rpool, that's not going to be the next step for me, right?
thx
Michael
Cindy
On 09/18/09 12:08, michael schuster wrote:
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Michael,
ZFS handles EFI labels just fine
to spot the zfs with the lack
of recognisable device path, though.
which df are you using?
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
the
old filesystems to the new filesystems, but it seems like there should
be a way to mirror or replicate the pool itself rather than doing it at
the filesystem level.
have you looked at what 'zfs send' can do?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see
a chance to
check what's inside ...
this is snv_89, btw. zfs and zpool are at current revisions (3 and 10, resp.).
does anyone have any hints what I could do to solve this?
TIA
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
Mark J Musante wrote:
Hi Michael,
Did you try doing an export/import of tank?
no - that would make it unavailable for use right? I don't think I can
(easily) do that during production hours.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
to patches (only)? There's much more to
support than just supplying (or even creating!) patches.
(oh, btw: wasn't IPS created in part to get away from the whole patch ...
ermm ... issue? ;-)
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
it.
Would the snapshot be overwritten or the system would warn there is no
free space?
I'd expect you'd get no free space or something like that.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs
/server:default
so what happens when you do svcadm enable svc:/network/nfs/server:default?
what's the output of svcs -x svc:/network/nfs/server:default, and what do
the log files you find there say?
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
:/network/nfs/server:default, and what
do
the log files you find there say?
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
yourself the
hassle of going through the vmware + windows combo.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
get the patch once it's available.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
- even if ZFS is the way to go, there's
no objecting to other people trying their own path, right? ;-)
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
allow' my only
option?
I would suspect as much, though I'll defer to the ZFS experts to give you a
definite answer.
Is 'zpool upgrade' / 'zfs upgrade' difficult for you?
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
.
would it be possible to create a zfs property, eg. mandatory, that, when
true, causes the behaviour we're discussing, and when false, doesn't stop
the rest of the boot process?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
if the mountpoint is non-empty.
to quote Renaud:
This is an expected behavior. filesystem/local is supposed to mount all
ZFS filesystems. If it fails then filesystem/local goes into maintenance
and network/inetd cannot start.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n
showed nothing.
so: how do I find out more about what's going on and what's broken, and how
do I fix it without just deleting the FS?
thx
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss
Michael Schuster wrote:
(btw: is the current version no printed on purpose, or is it understood
that zfs is always at the latest possible version?)
ah ... I just found the answer to that myself:
# zpool upgrade
This system is currently running ZFS pool version 10.
The following pools
The following filesystem versions are supported:
VER DESCRIPTION
---
1 Initial ZFS filesystem version
2 Enhanced directory entries
3 Case insensitive and File system unique identifer (FUID)
[...]
--
Michael Schusterhttp
Brian Nelson wrote:
Although not OpenSolaris, I had a raidz pool on a SCSI A1000 using Solaris 10
just disappear. zpool
import says no pool exists.
have you checked the state / health of the A1000?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
Hans wrote:
hello,
can i create a image from ZFS with the DD command?
You're probably looking for zfs send - have a go at the man-page and see
whether that serves the purpose.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
), and the value that
needs to fall below this threshold is freemem.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schusterhttp
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Again, I disliked the file;X
notation and the fact that a manual purge was required).
You could set the number of revisions to keep; VMS would delete older ones.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion
to the directory specified in
the tarfile, relative to the current directory.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
disallows to extract single
files
Rich never said so. He said the ability to do incremental backups and
restore arbitrary files from an archive are two different things. You were
addressing an issue he never brought up.
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n
Still not working..
I am running snv_82, a fresh install: is there anything else that I
should enable/disable ?
are you sure the service is actually running? does svcs -a | grep
webconsole say online?
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see
, and zpool status says everything is fine.
A du -k of both trees shows the discrepancy.
are you missing disk space, or actual files?
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
/photos and 25k files
in /pond/copytestsame
The original samba copy from another PC to /pond/photos copied
everything correctly.
I assume you've assured that there's enough space in /pond ...
can you try
$(cd pond/photos; tar cf - *) | (cd /pond/copytestsame; tar xf -)
Michael
--
Michael
with '.' by any chance?
If so, know that the glob pattern * does not match names that start
with '.'.
Valid point, but I think more precisely you need to ask whether any
files/directories in /pond/photos/ start with a .; beneath there, that
should be irrelevant.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
? if no, are there
errors in the messages file? ...
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
at one another (in the
hallway/at the conference table))
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Looking for a way to mount a zfs filesystem ontop of another zfs
filesystem without resorting to legacy mode.
doesn't simply 'zfs set mountpoint=...' work for you?
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs
filesystem.
I may be a missing the obvious here: what are you trying to solve that
Eric's explanation didn't cover?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Gary Mills wrote:
What's the command to show cross calls?
mpstat
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
if it goes wrong?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Mark J Musante wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Michael Schuster wrote:
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
This was added recently because ZFS can take a while to mount large
configs. Consoles would
the obvious:
- is this the same HW?
- are zfs/zpool and xfs set up similarly?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
this approach *will* cause data corruption.
wouldn't it be much simpler to use NFS automounter for this scenario
(I didn't follow the whole thread, so this may have been discussed
already)?
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion
in the order encountered in the script.
is there a reason you took dtrace-discuss off the distribution list?
cheers
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
timestamp (walltimestamp?); and perhaps
you'll want to somehow reduce the number of fbt probes, but that's up to
you. I hope you can take it from here.
cheers
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs
. with a
command like
ls -las | od -c
or some such)
HTH
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
--- - - - - - -
I find it remarkable that what is c1* in iostat obviously turns into c3*
in zpool iostat.
comments?
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
this directory in the first place,
is it an unreasonable expectation that zfs remove it as well?
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
that can help with such recovery?
I can't answer this in detail, but, to borrow from Tim O'Reilly, think
of it as the text of a book where you've lost the table of contents and
the first few chapters, and thrown all the remaining pages on the floor...
--
Michael SchusterSun
pool under Solaris 10.
How can I now mount/incorporate/import this Disk #2 into a ZFS pool on my new
Solaris so that I can see the data stored on that disk?
zpool import
HTH
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
.
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
John Martinez wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Michael Schuster wrote:
People,
indeed, even though interesting and a problem, this is OT. I suggest
that everyone who has trouble with SDM address it to the people who
actually work on it - especially if you're a (potential) customer
.
If you expand a bit on this, I'm sure our zfs experts can give you a
more precise answer than this :-)
HTH
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
these days? putting
/tmp on disk can have quite severe impact on performance.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
18:51:38 newponit so panic to ensure data integrity.
this message shows (and the rest of the stack prove) that your panic
happened in SVM. It has NOTHING to do with zfs. So either you pulled the
wrong disk, or the disk you pulled also contained SVM volumes (next to ZFS).
--
Michael Schuster
Ihsan Dogan wrote:
I think you hit a major bug in ZFS personally.
For me it also looks like a bug.
I think we don't have enough information to judge. If you have a supported
version of Solaris, open a case and supply all the data (crash dump!) you have.
HTH
--
Michael Schuster
. This is OpenSolaris.
no, I'm not. That's why I said If you have a supported version of
Solaris. Also, Ihsan seems to disagree about OpenSolaris:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # uname -a
SunOS newponit 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
Recursion
, the actual limit is 1 million
inode PER Terabyte.
HTH
--
Michael Schuster
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
this is somewhat hard to put into context.
get a complete description of what this is about, then maybe we can give you a
useful answer.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
issuing zfs import on the new system (you may
need to add -f). As long as you don't reattach the crashed machine to the
storage, all should be fine.
HTH
--
Michael Schuster +49 89 46008-2974 / x62974
visit the online support center: http://www.sun.com/osc/
Recursion, n.: see
* by another host)
--
Michael Schuster +49 89 46008-2974 / x62974
visit the online support center: http://www.sun.com/osc/
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
provider
chad at shire.net
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schuster +49
Alf wrote:
What do you thing about pulling out a mirror on D1000 and the completely
hang of the system?
I on purpose left that for others to answer - I don't know HW well enough by
far :-)
--
Michael Schuster +49 89 46008-2974 / x62974
visit the online support center
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
