Ok, I'll bite. It's been a long day, so that may be why I can't see
why the radioisotopes in lead that was dug up 100 years ago would be
any more depleted than the lead that sat in the ground for the
intervening 100 years. Half-life is half-life, no?
Now if it were something about the
Anantha N. Srirama writes:
Agreed, I guess I didn't articulate my point/thought very well. The
best config is to present JBoDs and let ZFS provide the data
protection. This has been a very stimulating conversation thread; it
is shedding new light into how to best use ZFS.
I would
On 29/01/2007, at 12:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28-Jan-07, at 7:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
... ZFS will not stop alpha particle induced memory corruption
after data has been received by server and verified to be
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
... ZFS will not stop alpha particle induced memory corruption
after data has been received by server and verified to be correct.
Sadly I've been hit with that as well.
My brother points out that you can use a rad hardened CPU. ECC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
... ZFS will not stop alpha particle induced memory corruption
after data has been received by server and verified to be correct.
Sadly I've been hit with that as well.
My brother points out that you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alpha particles which hit CPUs must have their origin inside said CPU.
(Alpha particles do not penentrate skin, paper, let alone system cases
or CPU packagaging)
Gamma rays cannot be shielded in a senseful way.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg
On 28-Jan-07, at 7:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
... ZFS will not stop alpha particle induced memory corruption
after data has been received by server and verified to be correct.
Sadly I've been hit with that as well.
My brother
On 28-Jan-07, at 7:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
... ZFS will not stop alpha particle induced memory corruption
after data has been received by server and verified to be correct.
Sadly I've been hit with that as well.
My brother
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:15:30PM -0800, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
I'm not sure what benefit you forsee by running a COW filesystem
(ZFS) on a COW array (NetApp).
The application requires a filesystem with POSIX semantics. My first
choice would be NFS from the Netapp, but this won't work in
Agreed, I guess I didn't articulate my point/thought very well. The best config
is to present JBoDs and let ZFS provide the data protection. This has been a
very stimulating conversation thread; it is shedding new light into how to best
use ZFS.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
We had in flight data corruption that EMC faithfully wrote just
like NetApp would in your case. Everybody is assuming that
corruption or data loss occurs only on disks, it can happen
everywhere. In a datacenter SAN you've so many more
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
... ZFS will not stop alpha particle induced memory corruption
after data has been received by server and verified to be correct.
Sadly I've been hit with that as well.
My brother points out that you can use a rad hardened CPU. ECC
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:15:30PM -0800, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
I'm not sure what benefit you forsee by running a COW filesystem
(ZFS) on a COW array (NetApp).
Assuming that that question was addressed to me, the primary feature
that I need from ZFS is snapshots. The Netapp has snapshots
13 matches
Mail list logo
