Ok, so summarizing the feedback I see so far: Yes all distros support Gtk
2.20, so we can rely on it for new features. No need to support older
version indefinitely. However some systems have older installations that can
not easily be update, so would be nice if zim can run at those systems.
This
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:23:07AM +0200, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:
Ok, so summarizing the feedback I see so far: Yes all distros support Gtk
2.20, so we can rely on it for new features. No need to support older
version indefinitely. However some systems have older installations that can
not
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:00:12 -0400
Brian Shaver shakerl...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this sentiment. The current Zim is stable enough and
feature rich enough for those unfortunate to be stuck on an older
system and unable to upgrade. Zim would not be the only application
impacted by their
I'll second the sentiment expressed earlier in this thread...
If an old OS isn't supported by its vendor anymore, we don't fall back on
its old standard libraries.
Personally I'd be okay with using the most up-to-date GTK library that is
more or less commonly available (current versions of:
El Jueves 31 Marzo 2011, Jaap Karssenberg escribió:
1/ Anybody using Gtk 2.12 with no possible to update ?
Hi,
maemo is stuck with old gtk
maemo4: 2.10
maemo5: 2.14
Regards,
Miguel Angel
--
Don't see the world through a window, be open{source}minded, and be free :-)
Hi Jaap,
I see following available:
Ubuntu: 2.22 (maverick), 2.12 (Lucid - LST)
Are you sure about Lucid? The version of libgtk-2.0-0 in Lucid seems
to be 2.20, python-gtk2 is 2.17. The same holds for Debian stable and
testing.
Best,
Marcel
PS: I'm on Maverick and Natty, so no problems
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Jaap Karssenberg
jaap.karssenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ubuntu:2.22 (maverick), 2.12 (Lucid - LST)
Correction, Lucid actually has 2.20 (
http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgtk2.0-0)
Also debian stable (squeeze) has 2.20 (
F14 is on 2.22
F15 is on 2.24
Even F13 is on 2.20, so no issue for Fedora platform.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=190
Frank
On 03/31/2011 02:51 PM, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Jaap Karssenberg
jaap.karssenb...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:32 AM, s...@z107.de wrote:
At my work 2.16.1-0ubuntu2 is installed (ubuntu jauny, :/ ) and I have
no root account, so I can not (easily) change it.
Are all the official updates installed in that machine?
--
Juancarlo *Añez*
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:19 AM, s...@z107.de wrote:
I hope so, but I am not sure. And it is no longer possible to search the
package archive for jaunty packages.
MHO is that the design of new versions of software should not be restricted
by operating system versions that are no longer
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:59:47AM -0430, Juancarlo Añez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:19 AM, s...@z107.de wrote:
I hope so, but I am not sure. And it is no longer possible to search the
package archive for jaunty packages.
MHO is that the design of new versions of software should
But I think zim should support debian old-stables
release at least for some month. Squeeze is now stable for two month and
not every admin starts updating directly.
I think this is all not about supporting a release (i.e. providing
bug fixes) but about whether *new* versions of zim ( 0.5) will
I agree with this sentiment. The current Zim is stable enough and feature
rich enough for those unfortunate to be stuck on an older system and unable
to upgrade. Zim would not be the only application impacted by their aging
environment.
Brian ..
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Ian Starrie
13 matches
Mail list logo
