Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-11 Thread Alan Runyan
in that vein, DirectoryStorage-behind-ZEO has worked perfectly for years... but this new stuff is very interesting! wishing we could get DirectoryStorage into svn.zope.org ~alan ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-11 Thread David Pratt
Hi Alan. I am working on cleanup and will releasing a version with new licensing at some point in near future. I am working at this with bits of time I have between other work. Unfortunately, it had been left for a couple of years without attention and my interest is in keeping it up to date

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-11 Thread David Pratt
Hi Alan. I'm keeping the thread on the list since you raised the issue here. There are several repositories of zope related code that exist outside of svn.zope.org. I have made the decision to host DirectoryStorage at sourceforge on the basis that I have committed to maintaining and

[ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-10 Thread Kenneth Miller
Hello all, I'm currently developing my application ontop of zodb/zeo, and the idea of having the Zeo server the only single point of failure still bothers me. My question is, has anyone thought of any solutions for this. My idea was to have a few or more background processes

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-10 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 10, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Kenneth Miller wrote: Hello all, I'm currently developing my application ontop of zodb/zeo, and the idea of having the Zeo server the only single point of failure still bothers me. My question is, has anyone thought of any solutions for this. My idea was

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Kenneth Miller wrote: I'm currently developing my application ontop of zodb/zeo, and the idea of having the Zeo server the only single point of failure still bothers me. My question is, has anyone thought of any solutions for this. My idea was to have a few or more background

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Christian Theune wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:34:59PM -0500, Kenneth Miller wrote: Hello all, I'm currently developing my application ontop of zodb/zeo, and the idea of having the Zeo server the only single point of failure still bothers me. My question is, has anyone thought

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-10 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:28:48PM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote: Christian Theune wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:34:59PM -0500, Kenneth Miller wrote: Hello all, I'm currently developing my application ontop of zodb/zeo, and the idea of having the Zeo server the only single

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Zeo Server as a single point of failure

2008-03-10 Thread Paul Winkler
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:28:48PM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote: I got a report from one person who put RelStorage behind a ZEO server. Apparently it works fine, though I haven't tried it myself. Maybe we're finally reaching the point where we can choose from several ZODB storage components