On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:28:48PM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Christian Theune wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:34:59PM -0500, Kenneth Miller wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>> I'm currently developing my application ontop of zodb/zeo, and the
>>>> idea of having the Zeo server the only single point of failure still
>>>> bothers me. My question is, has anyone thought of any solutions for
>>>> this. My idea was to have a few or more background processes that kept
>>>> multiple servers synced and concurrent. Any thoughts?
>> Just to make sure that all of the authors involved with anything here
>> up, please refer to the other two mails by Gary and Shane. ;)
> How is the ZEO RAID project going, anyway? It seems like a good idea and I
> don't think it actually depends on ZEO, does it? For example, I wonder if
> it's possible to create a RAID storage around a set of RelStorage
We have alpha1 out there (see the zope.org repository) with full fail-over and
We made some changes to the ZODB trunk to clean up some interfaces and make
ZEO support the more elaborate protocol details.
> I got a report from one person who put RelStorage behind a ZEO server.
> Apparently it works fine, though I haven't tried it myself. Maybe we're
> finally reaching the point where we can choose from several ZODB storage
> components and connect them with ease.
Yes, reaching that stage would be nice.
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org