Re: [ZODB-Dev] anecdotal speed comparison with RelStorage

2008-03-28 Thread Chris Withers
Shane Hathaway wrote: I'd be really interested to try some tests with multiple ZEO clients attached to a FileStorage versus multiple RelStorage client attached to Oracle. I suspect Oracle would win ;-) I am certainly interested in hearing the results of that test. Well, we tried this fairly

Re: [ZODB-Dev] anecdotal speed comparison with RelStorage

2008-03-26 Thread Chris Withers
Shane Hathaway wrote: Chris Withers wrote: FileStorage-over-ZEO managed the test in 3 mins 20 seconds Relatorage-to-Oracle managed the test in 3 mins 18 seconds Cool, although it's not clear the storage speed had a major impact. Well, the point was that RelStorage-to-Oracle was of similar

[ZODB-Dev] anecdotal speed comparison with RelStorage

2008-03-25 Thread Chris Withers
Hey All, Just finished doing some rough speed tests having got RelStorage up and running against an Oracle 10g database using Oracle's InstantClient and cx_Oracle 4.3.3... The tests involved basically creating 10 folders, each with 10 pages in them, in a Plone site, using zope.testbrowser.

Re: [ZODB-Dev] anecdotal speed comparison with RelStorage

2008-03-25 Thread Shane Hathaway
Chris Withers wrote: FileStorage-over-ZEO managed the test in 3 mins 20 seconds Relatorage-to-Oracle managed the test in 3 mins 18 seconds Cool, although it's not clear the storage speed had a major impact. If it did have a major impact, then the same test using plain FileStorage or