On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database
BK raw devices
Having built the second revision of the Run-Time Platform Solaris, I went on to
install zones.
Effectively it turns out that if I were to satisfy all the dependencies, I
would effectively have to install more or less the entire X windowing
environment.
Zone packages end up needing other
On 21/08/06, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having built the second revision of the Run-Time Platform Solaris, I went on to
install zones.
Effectively it turns out that if I were to satisfy all the dependencies, I
would effectively have to install more or less the entire X windowing
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:13:51AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
Having built the second revision of the Run-Time Platform Solaris, I went on
to install zones.
Effectively it turns out that if I were to satisfy all the dependencies, I
would effectively have to install more or less the entire X
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:03:40PM +0100, Gary Pennington wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:13:51AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
Having built the second revision of the Run-Time Platform Solaris, I went
on to install zones.
Effectively it turns out that if I were to satisfy all the
Do you know if there is a plan to make this available as an S10 patch?
Gary Pennington wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:03:40PM +0100, Gary Pennington wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:13:51AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
Having built the second revision of the Run-Time Platform Solaris, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the
