Re: [zones-discuss] VCS failover of non-global zones between systems.

2006-05-12 Thread Jason Schroeder
Peter Wilk wrote: This implies that both (all) systems in the cluster MUST be at identical patch levels. Yes, you want this. Does Sun support the migration of zones from one machine to another via this technique? Is there an official position? A note that Sun Cluster 3.1 08/05

Re: [zones-discuss] VCS failover of non-global zones between systems.

2006-05-12 Thread Detlef Ulherr - Sun Client Solutions Germany - Frankfurt
Hi, This procedure was changed in the release notes. Modifying /etc/zones/index or the zonname.xml is unsupported. Keep in mind, that the comments in these files tell you to keep your hand off. Kind regards Detlef Ulherr On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:23:42AM -0400, Jason Schroeder wrote: Peter

Re: [zones-discuss] query re zones and trusted solaris

2006-05-12 Thread James Carlson
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes: What is the impact on the use of non-global zones and trusted Solaris? i.e. if I install trusted Solaris, are there any restrictions on the use of non-global zones, expecially with respect to networking? In effect, you

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Non-global zone sending TCP SYN-ACK packet over

2006-05-12 Thread James Carlson
Tobias Oberstein writes: One more Q: does stateful IPF work if I'd connect e1000g0-3 to a LACP-capable Switch and combine the ifcs using Solaris 10 1/06 link aggregation to a logical, aggregated interface? Yes, assuming that driver is supported for aggregation. In that case, you'll have the

Re: [zones-discuss] query re zones and trusted solaris

2006-05-12 Thread James Carlson
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes: I was looking at a box this am that was setup with this scenario, and the non-global zones were apparently not able to see outside the box, they could ping the global etc, but nothing else. Guess that explains that then,

Re: [zones-discuss] patching a full non-global zone solaris 10 1/06

2006-05-12 Thread Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer
Hi Peter I know that there are problems with the patch clusters at present see bug-id 6407693 06.04.01 S10 Recommended Cluster has an incorrect patch install order basically 119254-19 is being installed before it's required patches, which leads to it not installing. Possibly this might have

Re: [zones-discuss] query re zones and trusted solaris

2006-05-12 Thread Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer
James Carlson wrote: Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes: I was looking at a box this am that was setup with this scenario, and the non-global zones were apparently not able to see outside the box, they could ping the global etc, but nothing

Re: [zones-discuss] patching a full non-global zone solaris 10 1/06

2006-05-12 Thread Peter Wilk
Enda, if you want to check here are all the files /net/cores.central/cores/dir23/65009511 sedona% ls * 119689-07.log.22068 118712-09.log.9307119985-02.log.8349 118822-30.log.9404121308-03.log.18339