Wes Mauer wrote:
OpenSolaris 0609.
I've managed to get Samba installed in a non global zone, but it will not start.
If you truss smbd, I expect that this is failing due to a
missing privilege:
# truss -f /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd
...
15231: so_socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP, 0x,
Glenn Faden wrote:
Well, it doesn't have to be possible. Instead it should be possible to
have the mount(2) syscall detect the loopback NFS and convert it into a
lofs mount if, say, a flag is set in the arguments, or even by default.
I've thought about doing this in the past, but wasn't
Hi all,
I'm working on a project (CIFS client) that needs a device
driver. I'm working on zones support, including zone checks
to make sure cross-zone access doesn't happen. The device
doesn't show up in a non-global zone, which doesn't surprise
me, since I expect to have to do work to make
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
well, assuming that you're talking about a pseudo device with
a static path, then check out:
usr/src/lib/brand/native/zone/platform.xml
which get's installed as
/usr/lib/brand/native/platform.xml
if your device doesn't have a static path then things
Calum Mackay wrote:
It sounds like we're saying that NFS is just a basic system service that
we want to provide from our already existing - and independently-managed
- zones, rather than setting up zones specifically to provide separate
NFS services (with the various exceptions e.g. Jumpstart
Tom Haynes wrote:
What about the case where the customer wants to administer the zone they
purchased
and they do not want the global zone admins to have local access to
their data?
Well, there is a tradition in Zones of making the global zone
substantially more equal than others. Remember
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) A bug currently prevents a client instance and a server instance
from being safe to use on the same box (apologies, can't quote the
bugid from here). How likely, in your use case, is it that this will
be a problem, i.e. will your boxes be in the position where a
On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
i would refine your second point though because it doesn't take into
account lofs mounts.
ex, if i have /export/foo in the global zone and then in zonecfg i
configure a filesystem resource such that this directory is also
lofs mounted in
Octave Orgeron wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Since NFS is mostly an in-kernel service, unlike something like
Apache, if you have some kind of issue with NFS stability, you lose
the whole box, not just the zone. This lack of fault isolation isn't
always something that people are
